An 8-Week Study to Evaluate Tenapanor in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis (ESRD-HD)

NCT ID: NCT02675998

Last Updated: 2020-08-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

219 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase 3, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center study with a 4-week, placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal period will evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Tenapanor to treat hyperphosphatemia in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis (ESRD-HD). Subjects who qualify are randomized into the study will either receive 3 mg BID, 10 mg BID, or a titration regimen of tenapanor.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study consists of a screening visit, a wash out period of up to 3 weeks, when existing phosphate lowering medication is withheld, an 8-week treatment period, in which all groups receive tenapanor, and a 4-week placebo-controlled, randomized withdrawal period, during which patients are re-randomized 1:1 to either remain on their current tenapanor treatment or placebo.

Depending on the increase in serum phosphate levels, subjects can be randomized 1,2, or 3 weeks after being taken off their phosphate lowering medication.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperphosphatemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3mg BID

Tenapanor, 3mg BID (6mg total)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenapanor

Intervention Type DRUG

10mg BID

Tenapanor, 10mg BID (20mg total)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenapanor

Intervention Type DRUG

Dose Titration

Tenapanor, patients start at 30mg BID and can down titrate weekly to 20, 15, 10, and 3mg BID, sequentially based on a GI tolerability question

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tenapanor

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tenapanor

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

RDX5791, AZD1722

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 to 80 years old
* Females must be non-pregnant, non-lactating, and either be post-menopausal for at least 12 months, have documentation of irreversible surgical sterilization, or confirm the use of one of the acceptable contraceptive methods.
* Males must agree to avoid fathering a child and agree to use an appropriate method of contraception
* Chronic maintenance hemodialysis 3x/week for at least 3 months
* Kt/V ≥ 1.3 at most recent measurement prior to screening
* Prescribed and taking at least 3 doses of phosphate binder per day
* Serum phosphate levels should be between 4.0 and 7.0 mg/dL (inclusive) at screening
* For randomization in the study, after 1 week wash-out of phosphate binders, subjects must have serum phosphate level of at least 9 mg/dL but below 10 mg/dL and have had an increase of at least 1.5 mg/dL versus pre-wash out value
* For randomization in the study, after 2 or 3 weeks wash-out of phosphate binders, subjects must have serum phosphate level of at least 6 mg/dL but below 10 mg/dL and have had an increase of at least 1.5 mg/dL versus pre-wash out value

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe hyperphosphatemia defined as \>10 mg/dL on Phosphate-binders at any time point during clinical routine monitoring for the 3 preceding months before screening
* Serum parathyroid hormone \>1200 pg/mL
* Persistent metabolic acidosis defined as serum carbon dioxide \<18 mmol/L from two consecutive measurements during screening and washout periods
* Clinical signs of hypovolemia at randomization
* History of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or diarrhea predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D)
* Scheduled for living donor kidney transplant, change to peritoneal dialysis, home HD or plans to relocate to another center during the study period
* Diarrhea or loose stools during the week before randomization defined as BSFS ≥ 6 and frequency ≥ 3 for 2 or more days
* Any evidence of or treatment of malignancy within one year, excluding non-melanomatous malignancies of the skin
* Positive serology with evidence of significant hepatic impairment or WBC elevation according to the Investigator
* Life expectancy \< 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ardelyx

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David P Rosenbaum, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ardelyx, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ardelyx Investigative Site 429

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 425

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Clinical Site 403

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 410

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 430

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 427

Meridian, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 432

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 415

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 402

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 424

Roseville, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 409

Brookhaven, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 417

Columbus, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 431

Tupelo, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 423

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 416

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 419

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 408

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 411

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 420

New Bern, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 426

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 412

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 414

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 404

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 421

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 428

Sumter, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 413

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 418

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 406

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 405

Bellville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 422

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 407

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ardelyx Investigative Site 401

St. George, Utah, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sprague SM, Weiner DE, Tietjen DP, Pergola PE, Fishbane S, Block GA, Silva AL, Fadem SZ, Lynn RI, Fadda G, Pagliaro L, Zhao S, Edelstein S, Spiegel DM, Rosenbaum DP. Tenapanor as Therapy for Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Dialysis Patients: Results from the OPTIMIZE Study. Kidney360. 2024 May 1;5(5):732-742. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000387. Epub 2024 Feb 7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38323855 (View on PubMed)

Silva AL, Chertow GM, Hernandez GT, Lynn RI, Tietjen DP, Rosenbaum DP, Yang Y, Edelstein S. Tenapanor Improves Long-Term Control of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: the NORMALIZE Study. Kidney360. 2023 Nov 1;4(11):1580-1589. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000280. Epub 2023 Oct 19.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37853560 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TEN-02-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Uremic Pruritus With PA101B
NCT02696499 COMPLETED PHASE2