IDA+BUCY vs BUCY Conditioning Regimen for Intermediate-risk AML Undergoing Auto-HSCT

NCT ID: NCT02671708

Last Updated: 2020-03-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

153 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is an effective alternative to allogeneic HSCT for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) without HLA-matched donors. At present, the best conditioning regimen for AML undergoing auto-HSCT remains in discussion. In this study, the safety and efficacy of IDA+BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in intermediate-risk AML undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Auto-HSCT is an effective alternative to allogeneic HSCT for intermediate-risk AML without HLA-matched donors. BUCY conditioning regimen is the standard myeloablative regimen. However, auto-HSCT with BUCY conditioning regimen appears to have higher relapse rate. To reduce the relapse rate, IDA is added in the conditioning regimen. In this study, the safety and efficacy of IDA+BUCY and BUCY myeloablative conditioning regimens in intermediate-risk AML patients undergoing auto-HSCT are evaluated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Acute Myeloid Leukemia Conditioning

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

IDA+BUCY

For intermediate-risk AML undergoing auto-HSCT,IDA+BUCY conditioning regimen was IDA 15mg/m2/day on days -12 and -10;BU 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 and -2.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Idarubicin(IDA)

Intervention Type DRUG

Idarubicin was administered at 15mg/m2/day on days -12 and -10.

Busulfan (BU)

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.

Cyclophosphamide (CY)

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

BUCY

For intermediate-risk AML undergoing auto-HSCT,BUCY conditioning regimen was BU 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 and -4;CY 60 mg/kg/day on days

-3 and -2.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Busulfan (BU)

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.

Cyclophosphamide (CY)

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Idarubicin(IDA)

Idarubicin was administered at 15mg/m2/day on days -12 and -10.

Intervention Type DRUG

Busulfan (BU)

Busulfan was administered at 3.2 mg/kg/day on days -7 to -4.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cyclophosphamide (CY)

Cyclophosphamide was administered at 60 mg/kg/day on days -3 to -2.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Intermediate-risk AML
* Achieving CR after one cycle induction,then receiving three cycles of consolidation therapy including moderate and high doses of Ara-c combined regimens
* With negative MRD before mobilization and collect of peripheral blood stem cells
* Without HLA-matched donors (related and unrelated)
* Refusal of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Exclusion Criteria

* Any abnormality in a vital sign (e.g., heart rate, respiratory rate, or blood pressure)
* Patients with any conditions not suitable for the trial (investigators' decision)
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Peking University People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Zhujiang Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Guangzhou First People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Qifa Liu

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Qifa Liu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Hematology,Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Liu H, Huang F, Zhang Y, Wu M, Xu N, Fan Z, Sun Z, Li X, Lin D, Xiong Y, Liu X, Lin R, Shi P, Xu J, Wang Z, Li X, Sun J, Liu Q, Xuan L. Idarubicin plus BuCy versus BuCy conditioning regimens for intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing auto-HSCT: An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 trial. Am J Hematol. 2023 Mar;98(3):408-412. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26800. Epub 2023 Jan 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36588387 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IDA+BUCY vs BUCY-AML-2016

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.