Study of the Isotopic Distribution of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Ovarian Origin
NCT ID: NCT02667925
Last Updated: 2016-10-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A meta-analysis of retrospective series had shown that for every 10% increase in the complete cytoreduction rates were increased by 5.5% overall survival time (Markman et al, 2001). Currently, it is recognized that the best chance of survival conferred to patients whose initial surgical residue is zero (Harter et al, 2009).
However, even if macroscopically complete surgery and whatever the type of systemic chemotherapy, peritoneal recurrence remains high for more than 75%.
To reducing it of recurrence, a therapeutic approach is to administer chemotherapy intraperitoneally.
The intraperitoneal chemotherapy consists to administer the drug directly into the peritoneal cavity.
Alberts et al, 1996 and Armstrong et al, 2006 compared the efficacy in terms of survival of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy according to this method with a conventional systemic chemotherapy. Alberts reported a significant improvement in the median overall survival. Armstrong shows in addition a decreased risk of recurrence.
It must be remembered that:
* The establishment of an intra-abdominal catheter does not always ensure complete flow of drugs into the peritoneal cavity (major postoperative adhesions).
* There may be problems of catheters becoming blocked and requiring local treatment; these problems can cause abdominal pain whose care is difficult. Thus almost half of patients fail to get all six courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Thus, the investigators propose to estimate the flow of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with IP peritoneal scintigraphy, using a radiotracer (nanocis®). The investigators hypothesize that the movement of colloids in peritoneal cavity is similar to the circulation of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity (From Forni et al, 1993, Varia et al, 2003, Young et al, 2003, Dawson et al, 2011). The accumulation of radiotracer will be more correlated with abdominal pain sites described by the patient as well as peritoneal recurrence sites found during monitoring.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Hyperthermic Intraoperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer - A Feasibility Study
NCT00968799
Intra-peritoneal Chemotherapy in Ovarian Cancer
NCT02861872
Early Chemotherapy Based on CA 125 Level Alone Compared With Delayed Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Epithelial , Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer
NCT00002895
Dose Escalation of Cisplatin Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy After Surgery in Patients With Unresectable Stage IIIC Ovarian, Tube or Peritoneal Primary Adenocarcinoma
NCT02217956
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
NCT02125513
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A meta-analysis of retrospective series had shown that for every 10% increase in the complete cytoreduction rates were increased by 5.5% overall survival time (Markman et al, 2001). Currently, it is recognized that the best chance of survival conferred to patients whose initial surgical residue is zero (Harter et al, 2009).
However, even if macroscopically complete surgery and whatever the type of systemic chemotherapy, peritoneal recurrence remains high for more than 75%.
To reducing it of recurrence, a therapeutic approach is to administer chemotherapy intraperitoneally.
The intraperitoneal chemotherapy consists to administer the drug directly into the peritoneal cavity at a frequency that is related to systemic chemotherapy (every 3 weeks).
Alberts et al, 1996 and Armstrong et al, 2006 compared the efficacy in terms of survival of an intraperitoneal chemotherapy according to this method with a conventional systemic chemotherapy. Alberts reported a significant improvement in the median overall survival (49 vs 41 months). Armstrong shows in addition a decreased risk of recurrence.
It must be remembered that:
* The establishment of an intra-abdominal catheter does not always ensure complete flow of drugs into the peritoneal cavity (major postoperative adhesions).
* There may be problems of catheters becoming blocked and requiring local treatment; these problems can cause abdominal pain whose care is difficult. Thus almost half of patients fail to get all six courses of intraperitoneal chemotherapy.
Thus, the investigators propose to estimate the flow of intraperitoneal chemotherapy with IP peritoneal scintigraphy, using a radiotracer (nanocis®). The investigators hypothesize that the movement of colloids in peritoneal cavity is similar to the circulation of chemotherapy within the peritoneal cavity (From Forni et al, 1993, Varia et al, 2003, Young et al, 2003, Dawson et al, 2011). The accumulation of radiotracer will be more correlated with abdominal pain sites described by the patient as well as peritoneal recurrence sites found during monitoring.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention arm
Patients will receive an intraperitoneal chemotherapy (cisplatin) combined to a radiotracer (nanocis) in order to assess the intraperitoneal distribution of the chemotherapy
Intraperitoneal cisplatin with nanocis
Patients will receive an intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined to a radiotracer in order to assess the intraperitoneal distribution of the chemotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intraperitoneal cisplatin with nanocis
Patients will receive an intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined to a radiotracer in order to assess the intraperitoneal distribution of the chemotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* PNN\> 1.5.109 / L (without added GCSF)
* Plaquettes\> 100. 109 / L
* Bilirubine inferior or equal to 1.5 times the upper normal value (VNS)
* ASAT And ALT inferior or equal to 2.5 upper normal value (VNS)
* Alkaline Phosphatase inferior or equal to2.5 upper normal value (VNS)
* Clairance Creatinine\> 60ml / min Normal -Ionogramme
* PTT \<1.5 times the upper normal value (VNS) (heparin, or other accepted lovenox anticoagulants)
* PT / INR inferior or equal to 1.5 upper normal value (VNS) (or INR between 2 and 3, if the patient receives a stabilized dose of Warfarin)
* Patient operated first line without macroscopic residual for ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal or tubal stage IIIC or IV peritoneal pleural
* Minimum Required for surgery: hysterectomy, oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy and para-aortic omentectomy
* Patient requiring adjuvant chemotherapy
* Compulsory affiliation to a social security scheme.
* Obtaining informed consent in writing, signed and dated.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient deprived of liberty by a court or administrative.
* Patient having directions against the achievement of chemotherapy
* Concomitant treatment with a drug test, participation in another therapeutic clinical trial within 30 days
* Pregnant women
* Nursing women
* Patient with recognized hypersensitivity to cisplatin or platinum-containing products
* Patient with hypersensitivity recognized paclitaxel or any of the excipients
* Patient must be vaccinated against yellow fever
* Patient before taking phenytoin for prophylactic purposes
* Patient with hearing impairment
* Patient with hepatic impairment
* Patient with renal impairment Sensory or motor -Neuropathies\> grade 1 (CTCAE)
* Hépatite Or severe infection requiring parenteral antibiotics
* Serious non-healing wound or ulcer, or bone fracture
* Fistule Abdominal or gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess in the 28 days preceding the intraperitoneal chemotherapy Clinical -Symptômes, gastrointestinal obstruction or signs and / or which require a hydration and / or parenteral nutrition
* Patientes Has had or currently with inflammatory bowel disease
* Active bleeding or medical condition that carries a high risk of bleeding (eg, known coagulation disorders, coagulopathy, or tumor with large vessels)
* Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack, or subarachnoid hemorrhage in the last 6 months
* Disease clinically significant cardiovascular, including:
* uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure\> 150mmHg or diastolic\> 90mmHg
* myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the last 6 months
* NYHA class II-IV congestive heart failure
* serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring treatment: -an asymptomatic atrial fibrillation with controlled ventricular rate supraventricular tachycardia or controlled with medication and is authorized asymptomatic peripheral vascular disease o ≥ Grade 2 (CTCAE) (brief \[less than 24 hours\] ischemia episodes managed non-surgically and without permanent deficit)
* Antecedents of Hemorrhage or stroke (stroke), transient ischemic attack, or subarachnoid in the last 6 months Major Surgery within 28 days prior to inclusion
18 Years
70 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Jean Perrin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christophe Pomel, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Jean Perrin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harter P, Hilpert F, Mahner S, Kommoss S, Heitz F, Pfisterer J, du Bois A. Prognostic factors for complete debulking in first- and second-line ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 Dec;19 Suppl 2:S14-7. doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181bffb3f.
de Forni M, Boneu A, Otal P, Martel P, Shubinski R, Bugat R, Lucot H. Anatomic changes in the abdominal cavity during intraperitoneal chemotherapy: prospective study using scintigraphic peritoneography. Bull Cancer. 1993 Apr;80(4):345-50.
Varia MA, Stehman FB, Bundy BN, Benda JA, Clarke-Pearson DL, Alvarez RD, Long HJ; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal radioactive phosphorus (32P) versus observation after negative second-look laparotomy for stage III ovarian carcinoma: a randomized trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 1;21(15):2849-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.018.
Young RC, Brady MF, Nieberg RK, Long HJ, Mayer AR, Lentz SS, Hurteau J, Alberts DS. Adjuvant treatment for early ovarian cancer: a randomized phase III trial of intraperitoneal 32P or intravenous cyclophosphamide and cisplatin--a gynecologic oncology group study. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 1;21(23):4350-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.02.154.
Dawson SJ, Hicks RJ, Johnston V, Allen D, Jobling T, Quinn M, Rischin D. Intraperitoneal distribution imaging in ovarian cancer patients. Intern Med J. 2011 Feb;41(2):167-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.02112.x.
Alberts DS, Liu PY, Hannigan EV, O'Toole R, Williams SD, Young JA, Franklin EW, Clarke-Pearson DL, Malviya VK, DuBeshter B. Intraperitoneal cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide versus intravenous cisplatin plus intravenous cyclophosphamide for stage III ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1950-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199612263352603.
Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Baergen R, Lele S, Copeland LJ, Walker JL, Burger RA; Gynecologic Oncology Group. Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052985.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-004103-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.