Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigation of the Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc (NCT NCT02667067)
NCT ID: NCT02667067
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Results Overview
Individual success for the Simplify® Disc subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months of index procedure; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. Individual success for the control ADCF device subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in NDI Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.
COMPLETED
NA
150 participants
Baseline, 24 Months
2026-01-08
Participant Flow
Subjects were recruited across 16 clinical sites in the United States
This is a non-randomized study. The 117 ACDF subjects are a historical control group. (Kineflex C Study; NCT#00374413)
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion (ACDF)
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study utilized a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group was formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
117
|
150
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
96
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
21
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Investigation of the Simplify® Cervical Artificial Disc
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion (ACDF)
n=117 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study utilized a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group was formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=150 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
Total
n=267 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
44.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.0 • n=18 Participants
|
43.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=17 Participants
|
43.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.13 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
68 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
91 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
159 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
49 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
108 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
7 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
103 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
131 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
234 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
7 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
117 Participants
n=18 Participants
|
150 Participants
n=17 Participants
|
267 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Success is presented on observed data only
Individual success for the Simplify® Disc subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in Neck Disability Index (NDI) Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months of index procedure; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. Individual success for the control ADCF device subjects is defined as at least a 15 point improvement in NDI Score at 24 months compared with baseline, maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at 24 months compared with baseline, no device failures or revision, reoperation, removal and/or supplemental fixation within 24 months; and the absence of major adverse events within 24 months. NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=96 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=142 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Composite Clinical Success (CCS) of Simplify Disc
|
68 Participants
|
132 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 MonthsPopulation: Data is presented on available NDI scores.
Time to recovery is defined as time to first 15-point improvement in NDI NDI scale is reported in a range from 0 - 100, with 0 consistent with best ability to function and 100 with worst ability to function.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=111 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=145 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Subjects With 15-point Improvement in NDI at 3 Months (Time to Recovery)
15-Point Improvement (No)
|
21 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Subjects With 15-point Improvement in NDI at 3 Months (Time to Recovery)
15-Point Improvement (Yes)
|
90 Participants
|
139 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Presented data available for comparison (preop and at month 24)
Changes of at least 20 mm on a 100mm will be regarded as clinically significant VAS 0mm (no pain); VAS 100mm (worst pain)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
VAS Neck and Arm Pain
Success
|
83 Participants
|
134 Participants
|
|
VAS Neck and Arm Pain
Failure
|
12 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Subjects were analyzed based on available 24-month data.
Neurological success was defined as maintenance or improvement in neurologic status at Month 24 as compared to baseline, as determined by the independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC). The CEC reviews neurological exams of motor, sensory, reflex, clumsiness, atrophy, cramping, spasms, numbness, dysphagia, dysphonia, and myelopathic gait to make an adjudication determination.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neurological Status
Improved
|
52 Participants
|
111 Participants
|
|
Neurological Status
Maintained
|
38 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
|
Neurological Status
Deteriorated
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Subjects analyzed based on available data at month 24. Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
The PCS is a sub-score of the SF-12. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scores that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. Scores range from 0-50. Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=138 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Maintenance or Improvement
|
129 Participants
|
—
|
|
SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Absence of Maintenance or Improvement
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Subjects analyzed based on available data at month 24. Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
The MCS is a sub-score of the SF-12. The SF-12 is a multipurpose short form survey with 12 questions all selected from the SF-36 Health Survey. The questions were combined, scored, and weighted to create two scores that provide glimpses into mental and physical functioning and overall health-related-quality of life. Higher scores indicate better outcomes. Scores range from 0-50. Data was not collected on SF-12 in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=138 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Maintenance or Improvement
|
105 Participants
|
—
|
|
SF-12 Mental Component Score (MCS) Maintenance or Improvement
Absence of Maintenance or Improvement
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: Presented data on available survey responses at Month 24
Question 1 - "how does the subject rate satisfaction with the treated received" was compared between groups at Month 24. Answer options ranged from very dissatisfied to very satisfied.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=96 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=138 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Very Satisfied
|
67 Participants
|
122 Participants
|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Satisfied
|
20 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Somewhat Satisfied
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Somewhat Dissatisfied
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Dissatisfied
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Patient Questionnaires- Treatment Satisfaction Health Survey-
Very Dissatisfied
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on subject's with Odom's Criteria result at Month 24
Results at 24 months for the investigational Simplify® Disc and at 24 months for the control ACDF will also be categorized by the physician according to Odom's Criteria.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Odom's Criteria Results
Fair
|
8 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Odom's Criteria Results
Poor
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Odom's Criteria Results
Excellent
|
64 Participants
|
121 Participants
|
|
Odom's Criteria Results
Good
|
18 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data analyzed based on available 24-month DHI scores. Data was not collected on DHI in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI scale) for the investigational Simplify® Disc at 24 months compared to baseline. A higher score is indicative of a less desirable outcome. It is scored 0-100. Data was not collected on DHI in the historical ACDF control group. Only Simplify Disc subjects are reported. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=138 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI)
|
-2.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Change in average disc height (index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=91 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=135 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Disc Height (Index Level)
|
1.46 millimeters
Standard Deviation 1.24
|
0.93 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Change in average disc height (Above the index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=91 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=137 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Disc Height (Above the Index Level)
|
-0.05 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Change in average disc height (below the index level) was compared to the baseline measurements and scored by an independent core lab (MMI). Average disc height is calculated as the simple average of the anterior and posterior disc heights.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=59 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=106 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Average Disc Height (Below the Index Level)
|
-0.07 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.07 millimeters
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Outcome reports the number and percentage of subjects with adjacent level disc degeneration (ALDD) above the index level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
None
|
15 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
|
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Mild
|
22 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Moderate
|
36 Participants
|
20 Participants
|
|
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Severe
|
20 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Superior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Unable to assess
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Outcome reports the number and percentage of subjects with adjacent level disc degeneration (ALDD) below the index level.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
None
|
14 Participants
|
95 Participants
|
|
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Mild
|
15 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
|
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Moderate
|
23 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Severe
|
10 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Inferior Adjacent Level Disc Degeneration
Unable to assess
|
33 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24
Device migration assesses significant movement of the implant postoperatively
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=95 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=139 Participants
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Device Migration
Unable to assess
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Device Migration
Right
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Device Migration
None
|
90 Participants
|
137 Participants
|
|
Device Migration
Anterior
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Device Migration
Posterior
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Device Migration
Left
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 24 MonthsPopulation: Data presented on available images at Month 24. Facet degeneration was not assessed in the ACDF historical control group, as there is no 24 month MRI. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Facet degeneration was assessed using MRI for the investigational Simplify Disc at 24 months compared to baseline. Facet degeneration was not assessed in the ACDF historical control group, as there is no 24 month MRI. This was pre-specified in the study design.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Anterior cervical discectomy & fusion (ACDF)
n=139 Participants
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study will utilize a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Facet Deterioration
None
|
80 Participants
|
—
|
|
Facet Deterioration
Mild
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
|
Facet Deterioration
Moderate
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
|
Facet Deterioration
Severe
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
|
Facet Deterioration
Unable to Assess
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion (ACDF)
Simplify Disc
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion (ACDF)
n=117 participants at risk
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study utilized a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=150 participants at risk
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections (all other infections - NOT at cervical surgical site)
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
1.3%
2/150 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pseduoarthrosis
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Trauma
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Headache
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Radiculopathy
|
1.7%
2/117 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychological Illness
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain (narcotic given)
|
2.6%
3/117 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
1.3%
2/150 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Adjacent Segment Degeneration
|
2.6%
3/117 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
1.3%
2/150 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Surgery at a location other than the spine
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
1.3%
2/150 • Number of events 5 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal Complications
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
2.0%
3/150 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal Stenosis
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Inflammation Conditions
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Esophageal Perforation
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection; localized to cervical surgical site
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Ischemia
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Deep wound infection; localized to cervical surgical site
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.67%
1/150 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Product Issues
Implant Collapse or Subsidence
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain (No Narcotic Given)
|
1.7%
2/117 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary Embolism
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other
|
0.85%
1/117 • Number of events 1 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
|
1.7%
2/117 • Number of events 2 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
0.00%
0/150 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Anterior Cervical Discectomy & Fusion (ACDF)
n=117 participants at risk
Anterior Cervical Discectomy \& Fusion: This study utilized a non-concurrent historical control with subject-level data on a parallel group design. The historical control group will be formed from the randomized ACDF arm (N=133) of the recently completed Kineflex®\|C Disc trial.
|
Simplify Disc
n=150 participants at risk
Simplify Disc
Simplify Disc: Simplify Disc at one level in the cervical spine.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spasm
|
4.3%
5/117 • Number of events 6 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
15.3%
23/150 • Number of events 24 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Trauma
|
6.0%
7/117 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
8.0%
12/150 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Other
|
5.1%
6/117 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
8.7%
13/150 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
2.6%
3/117 • Number of events 3 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
5.3%
8/150 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infections (All other infections NOT at cervical surgical site)
|
4.3%
5/117 • Number of events 7 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
5.3%
8/150 • Number of events 12 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Inflammation
|
10.3%
12/117 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
10.7%
16/150 • Number of events 18 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Adjacent Segment Degeneration
|
6.8%
8/117 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
6.7%
10/150 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Radiculopathy
|
17.9%
21/117 • Number of events 29 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
19.3%
29/150 • Number of events 35 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain (No narcotic given)
|
12.8%
15/117 • Number of events 18 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
9.3%
14/150 • Number of events 15 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Compressive Neuropathy
|
7.7%
9/117 • Number of events 10 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
2.7%
4/150 • Number of events 4 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
10.3%
12/117 • Number of events 14 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
4.0%
6/150 • Number of events 8 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain (Narcotic given)
|
17.9%
21/117 • Number of events 29 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
7.3%
11/150 • Number of events 11 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
GI Complications
|
0.00%
0/117 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
5.3%
8/150 • Number of events 9 • Adverse events were collected continuously throughout study follow-up period. Results are reported through study day 790.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Publication results vary per investigator and per clinical trial agreement.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER