Plaque Prolapse Prevention Carotid Artery Stenting (3PCAS)

NCT ID: NCT02665585

Last Updated: 2017-09-15

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 58 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2014-11-30
• Study Completion Date: 2016-10-31

Brief Summary

The aim of the present positive-control study is to analyze and compare the rate of off-table subclinical neurological events in two groups of patients submitted to carotid artery stenting (CAS) with two different kind of stents, a close-cell stent, and the new mesh-covered stent, so to verify if the new model of stent is effective in preventing postprocedural carotid plaque embolism.

Detailed Description

Scientific background and explanation of rationale: CAS in selected asymptomatic patients has proven to be effective in reducing the risk of carotid-related neurological ischemic events in selected patients. It also carries a not-negligible risk of intraprocedural and postprocedural (so-called "off-table") embolic events causing clinical (TIA, stroke, death) and subclinical (Magnetic Resonance Imaging - MRI-detectable microembolic brain lesions, cognitive impairment, increase in markers of brain injury) morbidity. CAS technique has progressively refined in order to minimize the risk of intraprocedural embolism, but despite the increasing use of close-cell design stents the risk of plaque prolapse through the stent struts and of postprocedural embolism still exists. In order to prevent plaque prolapse a new stent design has been conceived and realized. It combines the traditional open-cell design to an exterior PET mesh that is able to capture and keep in place plaque debris as small as 150-180µm.

The aim of the present positive-control study is to analyze and compare the rate of off-table subclinical neurological events in two groups of patients submitted to CAS with two different kind of stents, a close-cell stent, and the new mesh-covered stent, so to verify if the new model of stent is effective in preventing postprocedural carotid plaque embolism.

Methods

Trial Design: single-center, superiority, randomized controlled trial comparing results between two different carotid stents in patients affected by asymptomatic ≥70% carotid artery stenosis.

Participants:

CAS inclusion criteria are: age more than 55 years, presence of a carotid stenosis ≥70% (NASCET evaluation criteria), with no previous neurologic symptoms referred in the medical history, absence of a previous brain ischemic lesion detected at Diffusion Weighted (DW)-MRI. Patients with symptomatic carotid lesions, previous ischemic lesions detected at DW-MRI, or inability to give consent will be excluded from the study.

Exclusion criteria for CAS are: significant contraindications to angiography, history of bleeding disorder, or intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation or hemorrhage, presence of intraluminal thrombus, poor entry points at the femoral artery, type 2-3 arch, bovine arch, severe aortic arch or ipsilateral ostial common carotid or brachiocephalic atherosclerosis, severe proximal common or distal internal carotid artery tortuosity, sharply angulated internal carotid artery, carotid string sign, circumferential calcification of carotid plaque, length of the target lesion requiring more than one stent.

Eligibility criteria for randomization are: obtained informed consent, compliance to the study protocol. Patients will be randomized to receive either carotid Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) or C-Guard carotid stent (Inspire-MD, Tel-Aviv, Israel) a new mesh-covered open-cell stent.

Written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. Setting: data will be collected and analyzed at our Vascular Unit Academic Centre.

Interventions: CAS interventions will be performed with distal embolic protection device in all cases (Filterwire, Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) . Wallstent or C-Guard stent will be alternatively used to cover the whole plaque surface.

DW-MRI performance: all patients will be submitted to preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 72 hours postoperatively DW-MRI. The comparison between immediate postoperative and 72-hour examinations will detect any off-table events. Presence of recent ischemic lesions at preoperative examination will be considered an exclusion criterion for entering the study.

MiniMentalStateExamination (MMSE) Test and MontrealCognitive Assessment (MOCA) Test administration and interpretation: all patients will be submitted to preoperative and 72-hour postoperative MMSE and MOCA tests in order to prove the effect of CAS-related microemboli on cognitive performance. The research assistant responsible for performing the tests preoperatively and postoperatively in all patients is trained to administer and score the tests. Downgrading in the postoperative examination, such as from normal to some cognitive impairment (1 step) or a difference ≥4 in the postoperative score compared with the preoperative value will be considered significant. No psychotropic or sedative medications will be administered to the patients before performing tests.

NeuroSpecificEnolase (NSE) and S100β serum levels detection and analysis: The S100 test measures the β-subunit of protein S100 as defined by three monoclonal antibodies with a detection limit of 0.02 µg/L. NSE measurement is based on monoclonal antibodies that bind to the γ-subunit of the enzyme with a minimal measurable concentration of 0.3 µg/L. S100β and NSE proteins will be analyzed by the use of automated immunoluminometric assays (S100 Elecsys test, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany; ELSA-NSE, CIS Bio International, Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France). Venous blood samples will be obtained for each patient preoperatively (basal sample), at 5 minutes after embolic protection device retrieval, and at 2, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the end of the procedure. Samples will be allowed to clot. After centrifugation (1800g for 6 minutes) ≤20 minutes from collection, serum will be stored at -80°C for later analysis.

Objective: to demonstrate a decrease in off-table microembolic event rate in patients submitted to CAS with C-Guard stent implantation compared to patients with Wallstent implantation, detected by DW-MRI, markers of brain injury, and neuropsychometric tests.

Sample size estimation: assuming a type I error α=0.05, a type II error β=0.20, so a power (1-β)=0.80, an event rate in the control (Wallstent) group of 0.40 (40%), an event rate in the treatment (C-Guard) group of 0.10 (10%), so assuming a 30% event rate reduction in the treatment group, the estimation of sample size for each treatment group is 29.

Randomisation: a computer-generated random allocation sequence would be used. A blocked randomization will be performed with an allocation ratio 1:1. Allocation concealment will be used. Blind postprocedural DW-MRI assessment/interpretation, neurobiomarkers levels evaluation, and MMSE and MOCA administration will be done by those assessing outcomes.

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Disease

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

C-Guard carotid stent

Carotid stenting procedure by C-Guard stent implantation (InspireMD, Boston, MA, USA)

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Wallstent carotid stent

Carotid stenting procedure by Wallstent implantation (BostonScientific, Marlborough, MA, USA)

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Interventions

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Carotid stenting procedure by carotid stent implantation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• presence of a carotid stenosis ≥70% (NASCET evaluation criteria)
• no previous neurologic symptoms referred in the medical history
• absence of a previous brain ischemic lesion detected at DW-MRI

Exclusion Criteria

• symptomatic carotid lesions
• previous ischemic brain lesions detected at DW-MRI
• inability to give consent

• significant contraindications to angiography,
• history of bleeding disorder,
• intracranial aneurysm or vascular malformation or hemorrhage,
• presence of intraluminal thrombus,
• poor entry points at the femoral artery,
• type 2-3 arch,
• bovine arch,
• severe aortic arch or ipsilateral ostial common carotid or brachiocephalic atherosclerosis,
• severe proximal common or distal internal carotid artery tortuosity,
• sharply angulated internal carotid artery,
• carotid string sign,
• circumferential calcification of carotid plaque,
• length of the target lesion requiring more than one stent

• Minimum Eligible Age: 55 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 100 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Roma La Sapienza

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Laura Capoccia

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Francesco Speziale

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief and Full Professor Vascular Surgery Division, Department of Surgery "Paride Stefanini", Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy

Locations

Laura Capoccia

Roma, , Italy

Countries

Italy

References

Capoccia L, Speziale F, Gazzetti M, Mariani P, Rizzo A, Mansour W, Sbarigia E, Fiorani P. Comparative study on carotid revascularization (endarterectomy vs stenting) using markers of cellular brain injury, neuropsychometric tests, and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Mar;51(3):584-91, 591.e1-3; discussion 592. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.079. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20045614 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

3PCAS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id