Trial Outcomes & Findings for eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative (NCT NCT02665468)
NCT ID: NCT02665468
Last Updated: 2019-02-18
Results Overview
Measure the change in rate of use of secure messaging in intervention versus control Veterans, reported as participants in each arm that sent a secure message during study period.
COMPLETED
NA
1196 participants
Baseline and Six months
2019-02-18
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: Usual Care
Usual care control: As a usual control, Veterans did not receive additional information outside of usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
595
|
601
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
595
|
601
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
eHealth Partnered Evaluation Initiative
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
n=595 Participants
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: General Wellness Information
n=601 Participants
General wellness information
Active comparator control: The investigators will use an attention control (a control intended to balance the attention Veterans receive from the facility mailings and to enhance masking of intervention versus control). As an attention control must not have information about the intended intervention, the investigators will mail out general wellness information available on the VHA National Center for Prevention
|
Total
n=1196 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=7 Participants
|
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
535 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
539 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1074 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
420 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
415 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
835 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
70 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other Race
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
MIssing
|
136 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
144 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
280 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Six monthsPopulation: The number of participants who received the Supported Adoption Intervention as analyzed was 2 less (these materials were returned/wrong address) than initially randomized and baseline characteristics are presented for.
Measure the change in rate of use of secure messaging in intervention versus control Veterans, reported as participants in each arm that sent a secure message during study period.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
n=593 Participants
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: Usual Care
n=601 Participants
Usual care control: As a usual control, Veterans did not receive additional information outside of usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Rate of Use
|
85 Participants
|
28 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Six month follow-upPopulation: Participants who completed the 6-month follow-up survey
To explore the impact of secure messaging use on healthcare encounters, the investigators will compare the responses of each arm at 6-month follow-up assessment for Patient Self-reported Access to communication using 2 Questions adapted from the Survey of Healthcare Experience of Patients Scale which inquires, "How easy is it for you to communicate with your doctor when you need to?" and, "How easy is it for you to get to see your nurse when you need to?" Responses to scale were 1= "Never", 2= "Sometimes", 3= "Usually", 4= "Always"; where "Always" was the best score.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
n=269 Participants
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: Usual Care
n=316 Participants
Usual care control: As a usual control, Veterans did not receive additional information outside of usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Self-reported Access to Communication
|
3.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.11
|
3.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Six month follow-upPopulation: Participants who completed 6-month follow-up assessment
To explore the impact of secure messaging use on healthcare encounters, the investigators will use the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) designed to assess patients' perceptions of the degree to which their care experiences are consistent with the chronic care model and includes subscale scores for patient activation, goal setting/tailoring, and follow-up/coordination. Investigators compared arms at 6-month follow-up using scale 0 (not a problem) - 4 (very big problem), where 0 indicates the desired response.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
n=267 Participants
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: Usual Care
n=314 Participants
Usual care control: As a usual control, Veterans did not receive additional information outside of usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Care Coordination: Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
|
2.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.92
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Six monthsPopulation: Participants who completed 6-month follow-up survey
To explore the impact of secure messaging use on healthcare encounters, the investigators will compare each arm at 6-month follow-up assessment with responses from Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), a 15-item scale adapted to assess the degree to which patient healthcare provider is accessible and supportive (taking the participant's perspective, encouraging and answering questions, supporting their plans) This is a Likert scale ranging from 1 = "Strongly Disagree" to 7 = "Strongly Agree"; where in all but one question - 1 = "Strongly Agree" is the desired response. Responses were totaled, inverting the one question and mean was determined.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
n=270 Participants
Supported adoption intervention
Supported adoption intervention: An intervention where a healthcare system implements quality improvement by sending patients proactive reminders, motivational messages, and educational support to encourage use of a new service (i.e., secure messaging)
|
Arm 2: Usual Care
n=316 Participants
Usual care control: As a usual control, Veterans did not receive additional information outside of usual care.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physician Accessibility and Engagement
|
6.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.12
|
5.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
Adverse Events
Arm 1: Supported Adoption Intervention
Arm 2: Usual Care
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place