Effectiveness of the Advocate Lutheran General Survivorship Center Programs
NCT ID: NCT02660996
Last Updated: 2024-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
22 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-10-01
2017-08-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Quality of life
2. Distress level
3. Satisfaction with the Survivorship Program
General Hypothesis: Patients who participate in at least four classes in a two month period will have higher scores on the post-class satisfaction, quality of life, and distress surveys compared to their pre-class surveys.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Nurse Specialist Led Early Palliative Survivorship Care for Patients With Advanced Cancer
NCT05947695
Impact of a Resource-based Life Review Intervention on Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT04254926
The Effect of Self-Management Program Based on the Individual and Family Self-management Theory on Cancer Patients
NCT04822220
Evaluating Cancer Survivorship Care Models
NCT02362750
Accessible Cancer Care to Enable Support for Survivors Programme
NCT04014309
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* The RAND-36 survey is a form that includes 36 questions and asks how patients feel their illness has impacted them and their lifestyle with scoring as noted. Pre-coded numeric values are recoded per the scoring key. They are scored so that a high score means patient is in better health, 0 being the worst and 10 being the best. Scores represent the percentage of total possible score achieved. Items in the same scale are averaged together to create the 8 scale scores. Missing data is not taken into account. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0 has been validated in previous studies. According to the VanderZee's study (1996), it was shown that the "internal consistency of the instrument was high with high convergent validity."
* The Distress Thermometer (DT) tool asks patients 39 questions about practical, family, emotional, religious, and physical problems in a "yes" or "no" format. A "yes" will scored as 0 and a "no" will be scored as 1. Therefore, the lower the stress level, the higher the score. The scores will be added for a total score. If the patient does show a high level of distress with a score above 12 on the Distress Thermometer after the four classes at the Survivorship Center, we will refer the patient back to his or her physician for further guidance and possible counseling.
* The Expectation Survey consists of eight questions that ask patients about their expectations for what they want/hope to get out of the Survivorship Program. Patients will rank their answers from 1 - 5 based on how much they agree with the statement (1 being not at all, 5 being very much). The scores for each eight questions will then be averaged.
* The Satisfaction Survey is also an eight question form that is much like the Expectation Survey. Patients will also indicate how satisfied with they are with the classes/courses at the Survivorship Center. The same scaling as above (1-5; 1 being not all agreeing with the statement and 5 being very much) with be used. These two surveys will be pilot tested for content relevance and readability level with current patients. Editions will be made as necessary. There will also be an open ended question at the end to ask patients what they would add to the classes to make them more beneficial.
* Participants will be asked to complete the Rand-36 SF, Distress Thermometer, and Satisfaction Survey after attending at least four Survivorship classes in a two month period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Newly diagnosed with any type of cancer and now seeing one of the oncologists at the Advocate Lutheran General Hospital's Center for Advanced Care
* Patients new to the Survivorship Center or only visited once
* Must attend at least four classes in a two month period (any class, any time, any day)
* Able to consent
* English speaking patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients under the age of 18
* Pregnant patients
* Prisoners
* Unable to consent
* Non - English speaking patient
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sigrun Hallmeyer, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Advocate Lutheran General Hospital
Park Ridge, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
5857
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.