Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy (NCT NCT02659098)
NCT ID: NCT02659098
Last Updated: 2025-04-29
Results Overview
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
21 participants
Baseline and Month 1
2025-04-29
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
7
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Clinical Response of Subretinal Administration of CNTO 2476 in Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
76.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.12 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Treated Eye
|
0.132 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2093
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 2Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Treated Eye
|
0.073 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2273
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Treated Eye
|
0.079 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2502
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Treated Eye
|
0.090 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2628
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=18 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Treated Eye
|
0.119 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2598
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 18Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=17 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Treated Eye
|
0.107 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2512
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 24Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=15 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 24- Treated Eye
|
0.145 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.3065
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 30Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=13 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 30- Treated Eye
|
0.112 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.3093
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the study eye (Treated eye). BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=13 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 36- Treated Eye
|
0.211 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.3639
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 1Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Total Letters Score at Month 1- Fellow Eye
|
0.017 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0962
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 2Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 2- Fellow Eye
|
0.027 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0868
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 3Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 3- Fellow Eye
|
0.010 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.0960
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 6Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 6- Fellow Eye
|
0.033 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.1351
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score is: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=18 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 12- Fellow Eye
|
0.074 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.1807
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 18Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=17 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 18- Fellow Eye
|
0.075 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.1728
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 24Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=15 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 24- Fellow Eye
|
0.115 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.1962
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 30Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=14 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 30- Fellow Eye
|
0.106 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.1721
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Month 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint.
BCVA was assessed in the fellow eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logMAR visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there were 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represented a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score was: 1.7 - 0.02\*number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=13 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Total Letters Score at Month 36- Fellow Eye
|
0.309 logMAR
Standard Deviation 0.2435
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants who had BCVA data at a visit.
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing \>=15 BCVA in the study eye were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 1: Week 4
|
14.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 2
|
14.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 3
|
19.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 6
|
14.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 12
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 18
|
17.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 24
|
20.0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 30
|
23.1 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Treated Eye
Month 36
|
30.8 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Months 1, 2 , 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants who had BCVA data at a visit.
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. The percentage of participants losing \>=15 BCVA in the fellow eye were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 6
|
4.8 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 12
|
16.7 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 18
|
17.6 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 24
|
13.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 30
|
14.3 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 36
|
46.2 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 1: Week 4
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 2
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants Losing >=15 Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters: Fellow Eye
Month 3
|
0 Percentage of Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6 and 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye (Treated eye). The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Month 6
|
-4.5 Letters
Standard Deviation 13.14
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity Letters at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Month 12
|
-5.9 Letters
Standard Deviation 12.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6 and 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
BCVA was assessed as letters read using early treatment diabetic retinopathy study charts and reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the fellow eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Month 6
|
-1.7 Letters
Standard Deviation 6.76
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Month 12
|
6.76 Letters
Standard Deviation 9.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6 and 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
The area of GA was determined based primarily on fundus autofluorescence (FAF). The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=17 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Month 6
|
0.6691 Square millimeter
Standard Deviation 2.3301
|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Treated Eye
Month 12
|
2.4214 Square millimeter
Standard Deviation 1.3661
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6 and 12Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study. Here, N (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participant evaluable for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed at the specified time point.
The area of GA was determined based primarily on FAF. The change in GA lesion area was measured by FAF and analysis of FAF images was performed by the central reading center. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=13 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Month 6
|
1.2085 Square millimeter
Standard Deviation 0.7060
|
|
Change From Baseline in Growth Rate of Geographic Atrophy Lesion Area at Months 6 and 12: Fellow Eye
Month 12
|
2.6457 Square millimeter
Standard Deviation 1.9449
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Months 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
Number of participants with TEAEs and SAEs were assessed. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product. SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, Is life-threatening, Requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, Is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
|
20 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events
|
5 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Months 36Population: The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
Number of participants with ocular TEAE were assessed. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment and can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to that medicinal product.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 Participants
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Treated Eye
|
17 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Ocular Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Fellow Eye
|
10 Participants
|
Adverse Events
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemorrhagic Anaemia
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Aortic Valve Stenosis
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung Neoplasm Malignant
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Subarachnoid Haemorrhage
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
4.8%
1/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
CNTO 2476 3.0*10^5 Cells
n=21 participants at risk
Participants received a single subretinal administration of CNTO 2476 (Palucorcel) comprising 3.0\*10\^5 cells in 50 microliters (mcL) dosing volume on Day 1. CNTO 2476 was delivered using the custom-designed Delivery System and surgical procedure.
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Fibrillation
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Anterior Chamber Cell
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract Nuclear
|
14.3%
3/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Charles Bonnet Syndrome
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Haemorrhage
|
42.9%
9/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Oedema
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
14.3%
3/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal Haemorrhage
|
33.3%
7/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Acuity Reduced
|
23.8%
5/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual Impairment
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous Detachment
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vitreous Floaters
|
19.0%
4/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
General disorders
Sensation of Foreign Body
|
23.8%
5/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Corneal Abrasion
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
9.5%
2/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
14.3%
3/21 • Up to 36 Months
The safety analysis set defined as participants who were enrolled and received surgery in the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER