Comparison Between Different Technologies That Measure Respiratory Rate

NCT ID: NCT02657720

Last Updated: 2016-11-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-07-31

Study Completion Date

2015-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Respiration rate is a critical vital sign that provides early detection of respiratory compromise and patient distress. Continuous monitoring of respiration rate is performed in patients under different clinical conditions, including post-surgery or different respiratory diseases. Clinician observation, pulse oximetry, and capnography are used individually or in combination to monitor ventilation during sedation and on post-surgical patients. The American Society of Anesthesiologists mandates the monitoring of respiration by measuring end tidal carbon dioxide (RRetco2) during procedural sedation and anesthesia. Other techniques for respiration rate measurement include different technologies such as acoustic respiratory rate (RRa). The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of RRetco2 and RRa under certain respiratory conditions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Respiratory Conditions for Adults

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy volunteers

Respiration rate will be measured using several medical devices: Radical-7, Capnostream20p and PTAF2 (flow meter)

Group Type OTHER

Radical 7

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. Radical 7 measures respiratory rate according to acoustic respiratory rate (RRa).

Capnostream20p

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. Capnostream20p measures respiratory rate using capnography (RRetCO2).

PTAF2

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. PTAF2 measures respiratory rate using flow pressure (RRflow).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radical 7

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. Radical 7 measures respiratory rate according to acoustic respiratory rate (RRa).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Capnostream20p

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. Capnostream20p measures respiratory rate using capnography (RRetCO2).

Intervention Type DEVICE

PTAF2

Comparison between 3 different monitors that measure respiratory rate. The participant is connected to 3 monitors at the same time. PTAF2 measures respiratory rate using flow pressure (RRflow).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Flowmeter

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Without Clinical diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
* Without Clinical diagnosis of heart disease.

Exclusion Criteria

* Want to be excluded
* Breathing difficulties
* Unabling or unwilling to follow the protocol.
* Contact allergy to the adhesive neck sensor.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Herzog Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oridion

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michal Eisenberg, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Herzog Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Herzog Hospital

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10141352

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id