Trial Outcomes & Findings for Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Itch in EB Patients (NCT NCT02654483)
NCT ID: NCT02654483
Last Updated: 2020-03-23
Results Overview
Determine the efficacy of Serlopitant compared with placebo on reducing EB-associated daily itch score as measured by patient self-reports using a numeric rating scale (NRS) for itch severity.The NRS is comprised of one item and represents the numbers 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Because itch is subjective and can vary day to day, nightly NRS scores were recorded in patients' Itch Diaries. NRS recorded by subject daily, from screening visit through the end of the study. This study was designed to detect differences between the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was the comparative weekly change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) itch severity score from baseline over 8 weeks; derived from a linear mixed effects model which utilizes observations from both the treatment and placebo groups to generate an interaction term of interest. Itch severity changes from day to day and this model can more appropriately report trends in patients' itch severity with treatment.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
14 participants
Baseline and 8 weeks
2020-03-23
Participant Flow
A 30-day washout period from prohibited medications (if applicable) is included prior to arm assignment. All patients who complete the double-blinded period will be offered a 2-month period on active drug.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
5 mg VPD-737
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
VPD-737: VPD-737 inhibits the receptor neurokinin-1.
|
Placebo
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
Placebo: Matching tablets to VPD-737 tablets without active drug
|
|---|---|---|
|
Double-blind
STARTED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Double-blind
COMPLETED
|
7
|
7
|
|
Double-blind
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Open-label
STARTED
|
5
|
3
|
|
Open-label
COMPLETED
|
5
|
3
|
|
Open-label
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Itch in EB Patients
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
5 mg VPD-737
n=7 Participants
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
VPD-737: VPD-737 inhibits the receptor neurokinin-1.
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
Placebo: Matching tablets to VPD-737 tablets without active drug
|
Total
n=14 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=5 Participants
|
22.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.0 • n=7 Participants
|
25.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
7 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
14 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
NRS daily itch severity score
|
6.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
6.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.0 • n=7 Participants
|
6.6 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
NRS itch severity during bathing/dressing change
|
6.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
6.2 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=7 Participants
|
6.1 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
EB wound size
|
42.6 mm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 65.8 • n=5 Participants
|
25.0 mm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.9 • n=7 Participants
|
34.2 mm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.3 • n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeksPopulation: The relative effect of drug on the mean daily change in NRS itch severity score as compared to baseline is calculated and serves as the primary endpoint. Data is reported as point/week change (delta) in NRS itch score.
Determine the efficacy of Serlopitant compared with placebo on reducing EB-associated daily itch score as measured by patient self-reports using a numeric rating scale (NRS) for itch severity.The NRS is comprised of one item and represents the numbers 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). Because itch is subjective and can vary day to day, nightly NRS scores were recorded in patients' Itch Diaries. NRS recorded by subject daily, from screening visit through the end of the study. This study was designed to detect differences between the two treatment groups. The primary endpoint was the comparative weekly change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) itch severity score from baseline over 8 weeks; derived from a linear mixed effects model which utilizes observations from both the treatment and placebo groups to generate an interaction term of interest. Itch severity changes from day to day and this model can more appropriately report trends in patients' itch severity with treatment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5 mg VPD-737
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with active drug
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Comparative Weekly Change in NRS Itch Score Over the 8-week Active Treatment Period
|
-2 score/week comparative change
Interval -5.0 to 0.0
|
-1 score/week comparative change
Interval -7.0 to 1.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeksPopulation: Eligible participants were: age 13 and older with a clinical diagnosis of EB and a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score for pruritus of ≥4 at baseline on average itch or itch during bathing or dressing in the past 24 hours. Patients were required to have itch symptoms lasting ≥6 weeks that did not respond well to the current standard of care.
Wound dimensions, including length, width, and area (in cm2), will be obtained using the Canfield system. Changes in dimensions between visits as well as changes in dimensions from baseline will be recorded. Overall mean % change from baseline is reported as the secondary endpoint.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5 mg VPD-737
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with active drug
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Wound Healing Determination
|
154.54 percentage change
Standard Deviation 227
|
38.39 percentage change
Standard Deviation 180
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 8 weeksPopulation: The relative effect of drug on the mean change in NRS itch severity score during dressing changes as compared to baseline is calculated and serves as the secondary endpoint.
Itch is exacerbated by activities such as dressing changes or bathing. NRS itch score during bathing or dressing in the past 24 hours were collected. Numeric rating scale (NRS) for itch severity is comprised of one item and represents the numbers 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch"). This study was designed to detect differences between the two treatment groups. This secondary endpoint was the comparative change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) itch severity score during bathing/dressing changes from baseline over 8 weeks as determined by application of a linear mixed effects model.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
5 mg VPD-737
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with active drug
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
7 subjects were treated with placebo
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Mean NRS Itch Score During Bathing/Dressing Changes
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 1.0
|
-2 score on a scale
Interval -5.0 to 0.0
|
Adverse Events
Double-blind, 5 mg VPD-737
Double-blind, Placebo
Open-label, 5 mg VPD-737 - 5 mg VPD-737
Open-label, Placebo - 5 mg VPD-737
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind, 5 mg VPD-737
n=7 participants at risk
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
VPD-737: VPD-737 inhibits the receptor neurokinin-1.
|
Double-blind, Placebo
n=7 participants at risk
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
Placebo: Matching tablets to VPD-737 tablets without active drug
|
Open-label, 5 mg VPD-737 - 5 mg VPD-737
n=5 participants at risk
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days, followed by a wash out period and, 5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 2 months.
|
Open-label, Placebo - 5 mg VPD-737
n=3 participants at risk
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days, followed by a wash out period and, 5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 2 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pulmonary embolism
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
heart failure
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
pleural effusion
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
hematuria
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Double-blind, 5 mg VPD-737
n=7 participants at risk
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
VPD-737: VPD-737 inhibits the receptor neurokinin-1.
|
Double-blind, Placebo
n=7 participants at risk
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days
Placebo: Matching tablets to VPD-737 tablets without active drug
|
Open-label, 5 mg VPD-737 - 5 mg VPD-737
n=5 participants at risk
5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days, followed by a wash out period and, 5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 2 months.
|
Open-label, Placebo - 5 mg VPD-737
n=3 participants at risk
Placebo tablets to be taken daily by mouth for 56 days, followed by a wash out period and, 5 mg tablets of VPD-737 to be taken daily by mouth for 2 months.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
nausea
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
diarrhea
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
rash
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
otitis
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
headache
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
somnolence
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
dizziness
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
infection (wound)
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
exacerbation of pruritus
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
General disorders
flu-like symptoms
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
cough
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
pain
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
toothache
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
infection
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
General disorders
fever
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
skin ulceration
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Infections and infestations
upper respiratory infection
|
14.3%
1/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
constipation
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
20.0%
1/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
dysesthesia
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
pain
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/7 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
0.00%
0/5 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Up to 10 months; some patients did not proceed to the open-label arm immediately and were monitored for AEs during the period between arms.
AE grading by severity based on judgement of investigators. Grade I = mild, Grade II = moderate, Grade III = severe. AEs were captured/followed at all study visits.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place