INVEST Feasibility - Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery With Apollo in Patients With Brain Hemorrhage
NCT ID: NCT02654015
Last Updated: 2023-11-22
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-30
2022-09-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Study Design: This study will be a prospective, multi-centered trial that will enroll 50 patients at up to 10 United States (US) centers.
Patient Population: Patients with moderate-large volume (20-80 cc) supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who present within 24 hours of symptom onset. Enrolled patients will receive minimally invasive endoscopic evacuation with the Apollo system or Artemis Device.
Indication: The Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device is used for the controlled aspiration of tissue and/or fluid during surgery of the Ventricular System or Cerebrum in conjunction with a Penumbra Aspiration Pump. The Penumbra Aspiration Pump is indicated as a vacuum source for the Penumbra Aspiration Systems. The Apollo system has been cleared for the controlled aspiration of soft tissue and/or fluid during endoscopically guided neurosurgery of the ventricular system or cerebrum. In the present study, the researchers propose to investigate the feasibility of studying this patient population for eventual implementation of efficacy trials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Medical Management plus Apollo MIES
Subjects will receive best medical management for ICH plus they will receive the MIES surgery and use of the Apollo System for clot evacuation.
Apollo MIES
Subjects will receive best medical management plus MIES (minimally invasive endoscopic surgery with use of the Apollo System.
Medical Management
Subjects will receive best medical management for intracranial hemorrhage
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Apollo MIES
Subjects will receive best medical management plus MIES (minimally invasive endoscopic surgery with use of the Apollo System.
Medical Management
Subjects will receive best medical management for intracranial hemorrhage
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Supratentorial ICH of volume ≥ 30 mL \< 80 ml (measured using A x B X C/2 method)
* CT/MR demonstrates ICH stability (\< 5 cc growth) at 6 hours after admission scan
* If the initial stability scan shows growth, a second stability scan can be performed q12h until stability is demonstrated or until eligibility for the study has lapsed.
* NIHSS ≥ 6
* Presenting GCS 5 - 15
* Historical mRS 0 to 2
* Symptom onset \< 24 h prior initial CT
* Apollo MIES can be initiated within 72h of ictus/bleed
* SBP can be controlled \< 160 mmHg and sustained at this level for at least 6 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* Expanding hemorrhage on stability CT/MR scan
* "Spot sign" identified on CTA (May perform a second CTA at 12 hours to demonstrate resolution)
* Hemorrhagic lesion such as a vascular malformation (cavernous malformation, AVM etc), aneurysm, neoplasm
* Hemorrhagic conversion of an underlying ischemic stroke
* Infratentorial hemorrhage
* Large associated intra-ventricular hemorrhage requiring treatment for IVH-related mass effect or shift due to trapped ventricle (EVD for ICP management is allowed)
* Midbrain extension/involvement
* Absolute contraindication to CTA, conventional angiography, and MRA
* Coagulation Issues
* Absolute requirement for long-term anti-coagulation (e.g., Mechanical valve replacement (bio-prostatic valve is permitted), high risk atrial fibrillation)
* Known hereditary or acquired hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency
* Platelet count \< 100 x 103 cells/mm3 or known platelet dysfunction
* INR \> 1.4, elevated prothrombin time or activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), which cannot be corrected or otherwise accounted for (i.e., lupus anti-coagulant)
* Patient Factors
* Presenting GCS 3 or 4.
* High risk condition for ischemic stroke (high risk Afib (e.g., mitral stenosis with Afib), symptomatic carotid stenosis)
* Requirement for emergent surgical decompression or uncontrolled ICP after EVD
* Unable to obtain consent from patient or appropriate surrogate (for patients without competence)
* Pregnancy, breast-feeding, or positive pregnancy test \[either serum or urine\] (Woman of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test prior to the study procedure.)
* Evidence of active infection \[indicated by fever (at or over 100.7 °F) and/or open draining wound\] at the time of randomization
* Any comorbid disease or condition expected to compromise survival or ability to complete follow-up assessments through 180 days.
* Based on investigator's judgment, patient does not have the necessary mental capacity to participate or is unwilling or unable to comply with protocol follow up appointment schedule.
* Active drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator would interfere with adherence to study requirements.
* Currently participating in another interventional (drug, device, etc) research project.
22 Years
84 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
OTHER
University at Buffalo
OTHER
J. Mocco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
J. Mocco
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
J Mocco, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
George Washington University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
University of Buffalo
Buffalo, New York, United States
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Geisinger Medical Center
Danville, Pennsylvania, United States
Prisma Health
Greenville, South Carolina, United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GCO 16-0027
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id