Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED) (NCT NCT02653391)
NCT ID: NCT02653391
Last Updated: 2021-09-17
Results Overview
The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
22 participants
Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16
2021-09-17
Participant Flow
Part A 18 participants were randomized. The treatment eye was chosen at random and the fellow eye was the control/placebo eye. Part B The participants received either treatment in both eyes or placebo in both eyes.
Unit of analysis: eyes
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo Part A (Cohort 1)
Part A: Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 1.0% ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in the randomly selected study eye, and Placebo twice daily (BID) in the paired eye.
|
Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution Part B (Cohort 2)
Part B Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 3.0% ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in both the right and left study eyes (Cohort 2).
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
|
Placebo Part B (Cohort 2)
Part B Each subject will receive one drop of placebo comparator solution twice daily (BID) in both the right and left study eyes (Cohort 2).
Placebo Part B
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18 36
|
3 6
|
1 2
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
16 32
|
1 2
|
1 2
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2 4
|
2 4
|
0 0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving Elamipretide and placebo
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving Elamipretide.
|
Part B Placebo
n=1 Participants
Part B Participants include those receiving Placebo.
|
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64 • n=5 Participants
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=7 Participants
|
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=5 Participants
|
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Former Smoker
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Current Smoker
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Smoking
Never Smoker
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Population: All participants for whom ocular TEAEs were measured.
The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
n=1 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular moderate TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular severe TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular mild TEAEs
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Population: All participants for whom systemic TEAEs were measured. For Part A systemic events were not necessarily attributed to either intervention or placebo.
The incidence and severity of systemic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=1 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
n=3 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic mild TEAEs
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
|
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic moderate TEAEs
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
|
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic severe TEAEs
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured.
Number of participants who had a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part A. Part B is reported as separate outcome since unit of measure is number of eyes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 1
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 8
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 12
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 16
|
1 participants
|
1 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured with both baseline and post-baseline measurements.
Number of eyes with a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part B. Part A is reported as separate outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=2 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=6 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 4
|
0 participants
|
2 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 1
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 1
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 4
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 8
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 12
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 16
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12Population: All participants for whom intraocular pressure was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.
Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part A
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 1
|
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Error 0.64
|
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.49
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 4
|
-0.3 mmHg
Standard Error 0.47
|
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Error 0.31
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 8
|
-1.1 mmHg
Standard Error 0.47
|
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Error 0.64
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 12
|
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.45
|
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.43
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Over All 12 Weeks
|
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Error 0.22
|
-0.3 mmHg
Standard Error 0.21
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom intraocular pressures were measured.
Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part B. Part A is reported separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=2 Eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=6 Eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 1
|
3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.19
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 4
|
2.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.33
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 8
|
1.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
0.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.89
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 12
|
0.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 16
|
3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
|
1.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16Population: All participants for whom central corneal thickness was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.
Change from Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit as measured by Pachymetry for Part A. Part B is reported as a separate outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 1
|
15.4 µm
Standard Deviation 47.95
|
7.2 µm
Standard Deviation 19.99
|
1.8 µm
Standard Deviation 19.72
|
2.0 µm
Standard Deviation 25.51
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 4
|
9.4 µm
Standard Deviation 19.61
|
6.1 µm
Standard Deviation 14.32
|
4.7 µm
Standard Deviation 21.20
|
4.8 µm
Standard Deviation 26.52
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 8
|
15.4 µm
Standard Deviation 16.04
|
13.1 µm
Standard Deviation 22.35
|
6.1 µm
Standard Deviation 15.23
|
7.6 µm
Standard Deviation 9.61
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 12
|
12.3 µm
Standard Deviation 30.31
|
2.1 µm
Standard Deviation 31.80
|
-1.8 µm
Standard Deviation 28.25
|
0.0 µm
Standard Deviation 25.87
|
|
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 16
|
13.7 µm
Standard Deviation 19.50
|
8.4 µm
Standard Deviation 17.09
|
6.3 µm
Standard Deviation 21.18
|
8.7 µm
Standard Deviation 27.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom Central Corneal Thickness was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.
Central Corneal Thickness: by-subject data as measured by Pachymetry and Pentacam. Part A is reported as a separate outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4
|
650 µm
|
687.6 µm
|
656.3 µm
|
656.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
|
663 µm
|
660.6 µm
|
645 µm
|
642 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
|
626 µm
|
593 µm
|
604 µm
|
591.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
619 µm
|
613 µm
|
633 µm
|
602.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4
|
623 µm
|
599 µm
|
646 µm
|
600.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8
|
608 µm
|
624.3 µm
|
607 µm
|
608.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12
|
617 µm
|
608.6 µm
|
623 µm
|
593.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16
|
604 µm
|
598.6 µm
|
620 µm
|
600.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
|
620 µm
|
627 µm
|
635 µm
|
622.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
607 µm
|
618.3 µm
|
623 µm
|
617.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit
|
639 µm
|
621 µm
|
630 µm
|
622 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)
|
656 µm
|
618.3 µm
|
624 µm
|
604.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1
|
629 µm
|
616.6 µm
|
623 µm
|
608.3 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4
|
645 µm
|
631 µm
|
619 µm
|
626 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8
|
640 µm
|
646.3 µm
|
631 µm
|
645 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12
|
634 µm
|
645.3 µm
|
621 µm
|
637.6 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16
|
646 µm
|
638.3 µm
|
627 µm
|
630 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
|
655 µm
|
652.6 µm
|
632 µm
|
632 µm
|
|
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
664 µm
|
655.6 µm
|
643 µm
|
626.3 µm
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. Assessments were performed using the flex center and full auto methods for Part A and data from the flex center method was summarized. The flex center method was used for Part B. The percent of Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure. A decrease from baseline in % cell hexagonality means worse outcome, a increase from baseline means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
|
-6.812 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 4.3912
|
-2.952 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 4.0223
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
|
1.518 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 7.1703
|
-3.155 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 7.2515
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
|
0.738 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 5.0322
|
-0.764 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 5.1291
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. For images with poor quality or too few cells to register, there was no data available.
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage by-subject data: Part B. Data was only listed in weeks where images were good enough quality to quantify. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. The flex center method was used for Part B. A decrease in percent of cell hexagonality from baseline means worse outcome, an increase from baseline means better outcome.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
45.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
|
27.75 µm
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
39.50 µm
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
42.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
31.67 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
30.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
46.17 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
33.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
49.50 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
41.50 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
48.34 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
41.34 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
35.84 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
14.50 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
35.43 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
54.50 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
30.50 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
34.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
|
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
50.00 µm
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome). Part B was listed separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 1
|
1.8 letters
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
2.3 letters
Standard Deviation 4.69
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 4
|
0.8 letters
Standard Deviation 5.67
|
-0.1 letters
Standard Deviation 8.96
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 8
|
2.5 letters
Standard Deviation 4.87
|
1.3 letters
Standard Deviation 8.11
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 12
|
2.6 letters
Standard Deviation 4.59
|
0.8 letters
Standard Deviation 6.72
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 16
|
3.8 letters
Standard Deviation 5.33
|
2.6 letters
Standard Deviation 5.94
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12
|
80 letters
|
69 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4
|
63 letters
|
36 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled
|
NA letters
Not measured
|
NA letters
Not measured
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline
|
66 letters
|
69 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
62 letters
|
68 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4
|
64 letters
|
62 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8
|
67 letters
|
70 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12
|
68 letters
|
73 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16
|
62 letters
|
63 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline
|
63 letters
|
59 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
60 letters
|
60 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled Visit
|
0 letters
|
0 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
|
60 letters
|
57 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline
|
79 letters
|
71 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1
|
78 letters
|
71 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4
|
79 letters
|
72 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8
|
76 letters
|
70 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16
|
81 letters
|
68 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline
|
68 letters
|
31 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1
|
69 letters
|
30 letters
|
—
|
—
|
|
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
|
70 letters
|
37 letters
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12Population: All participants for whom endothelial cell counts were measured. All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Counts, or density (Counts/mm\^2) over all 12 weeks for Part A. Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
|
11.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 224.89
|
-166.9 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 231.84
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
|
-68.9 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 114.22
|
-33.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 105.18
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
|
-38.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 162.07
|
-24.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 178.93
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16.Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were "poor quality images" and hence, no data was available.
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density: Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were "Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register", there were no data available, and these were not listed below.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1069.2 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
|
934.0 counts/mm^2
|
NA counts/mm^2
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
1449.0 counts/mm^2
|
NA counts/mm^2
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1241.7 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1087.7 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1149.5 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
773.2 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1094.5 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
897.3 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1361.2 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
971.5 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
995.2 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
961.3 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1046.7 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
826.0 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1195.2 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1068.3 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1213.3 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
|
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
1032.5 counts/mm^2
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks. Coefficient of variation (CV) is Standard deviation (SD) of cell area divided by the mean cell area of endothelial cell analyzed. CV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells (polymegethism). By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. The more variation, the worse the outcome. Part B is is entered as a separate outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
|
-7.644 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 7.7617
|
-7.941 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 8.0334
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
|
-3.809 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 3.9095
|
-4.293 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 3.6388
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
|
7.823 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 5.0620
|
0.737 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 5.0326
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8,12, and 16Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were "poor quality images" and hence, no data was available.
Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were "Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register" there were no data available. CoV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells. By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. A CoV less than 40 is normal.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
|
64.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
51.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
61.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
69.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
47.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
58.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
60.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
56.8 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
73.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
58.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
59.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
51.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
65.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
50.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
62.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
58.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
63.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
32.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
|
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
|
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
|
63.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.
Change from Baseline in corneal area affected by microcysts by visit for Part A.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 Worsened
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 No Change
|
18 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 Improved
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 Worsened
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 No Change
|
17 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 Improved
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 Worsened
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 No Change
|
16 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 Improved
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 Worsened
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 No Change
|
15 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 Improved
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 Worsened
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 No Change
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 Improved
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.
Corneal area affected by microcysts: by-subject data for Part B. No microcysts were present for any timepoints.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) All visits
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) All visits
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 204 (Placebo) All visits
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) All visits
|
0 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16Population: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.
Count of participants in number, size and location of bullae by treatment. Part B is listed separately.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central Inferior 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central Nasal 3 bullae >1mm, 8 bullae <0.5mm
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central (Superior) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central (Temporal) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.
Number, size and location of Corneal bullae: By-subject data: Part B.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 eye
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eye
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide ) All weeks
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) All weeks
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) All weeks
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
—
|
—
|
|
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) All weeks
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
0 number of corneal bullae
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16Population: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.
Change from baseline in severity of corneal stromal folds by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator; severity is not assessed using a scale.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 Worsened
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 No Change
|
16 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 Improved
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 Worsened
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 No Change
|
14 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 Improved
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 Worsened
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 No Change
|
11 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 Improved
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 Worsened
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 No Change
|
10 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 Improved
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 Worsened
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 No Change
|
11 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 Improved
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.
Severity of corneal stromal folds by-subject data by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator in the following categories: Not present, trace, mild.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: trace
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline-Mild
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 - Trace
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 -Mild
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4 -Trace
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8-Mild
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8- no folds
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12-Trace
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12- no folds
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 -Trace
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 - no folds present
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline-no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline- Trace
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline: Mild
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1: Mild
|
1 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: trace
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: No folds present
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: trace
|
0 eyes
|
1 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
|
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit: no folds present
|
1 eyes
|
0 eyes
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12 weeksPopulation: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured
Change from Baseline in contrast sensitivity over all 12 weeks log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
3 cycles per degree
|
0.084 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0554
|
-0.013 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0499
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
6 cycles per degree
|
0.193 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0745
|
0.111 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0374
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
12 cycles per degree
|
0.050 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0787
|
0.013 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0503
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
18 cycles per degree
|
0.122 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0637
|
0.080 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0564
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visitPopulation: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured.
Contrast Sensitivity log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E by-subject data, Part B. Part A is listed separately. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
|
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 4
|
0.01 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Screening
|
0.70 log score
|
0.70 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Week 1
|
1.00 log score
|
1.00 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.70 log score
|
0.70 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Screening
|
0.61 log score
|
0.90 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Week 1
|
0.90 log score
|
1.20 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.61 log score
|
0.61 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline
|
0.60 log score
|
0.31 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 1
|
0.31 log score
|
0.60 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.60 log score
|
0.60 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline
|
0.01 log score
|
0.18 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 1
|
0.01 log score
|
0.18 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18 cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.01 log score
|
0.18 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Baseline
|
1.18 log score
|
1.18 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 1
|
1.63 log score
|
1.00 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 4
|
1.49 log score
|
1.34 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 8
|
1.49 log score
|
1.34 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 12
|
1.79 log score
|
1.63 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 16
|
1.79 log score
|
1.34 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Baseline
|
1.38 log score
|
1.38 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 1
|
1.85 log score
|
1.20 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 4
|
1.38 log score
|
1.56 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 8
|
1.70 log score
|
1.20 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 12
|
1.70 log score
|
1.56 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 16
|
2.00 log score
|
0.90 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Baseline
|
0.60 log score
|
0.60 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 1
|
1.08 log score
|
0.90 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 4
|
1.26 log score
|
1.08 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 8
|
0.60 log score
|
0.90 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 12
|
1.08 log score
|
0.60 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 16
|
1.26 log score
|
0.60 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Baseline
|
0.65 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 1
|
0.65 log score
|
0.18 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 4
|
0.65 log score
|
0.65 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 8
|
0.18 log score
|
0.48 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 12
|
0.65 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 16
|
0.65 log score
|
0.65 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Baseline
|
1.34 log score
|
0.40 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 1
|
1.18 log score
|
0.40 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 4
|
0.70 log score
|
0.40 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Early Discontinuation
|
1.00 log score
|
0.40 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Baseline
|
0.90 log score
|
0.61 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 1
|
0.90 log score
|
0.61 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 4
|
0.61 log score
|
0.61 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.61 log score
|
0.61 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline
|
0.31 log score
|
0.31 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 1
|
1.26 log score
|
0.31 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 4
|
0.31 log score
|
0.31 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.31 log score
|
0.31 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline
|
0.01 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 1
|
0.65 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
|
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Early Discontinuation
|
0.01 log score
|
0.01 log score
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
Part A Placebo Only
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only
Part B Placebo
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye and placebo in other eye. This arm will report systemic events that cannot be attributed to either intervention.
|
Part A Placebo Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for placebo eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving Placebo in one eye only.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for elamipretide eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye only.
|
Part B Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving Placebo in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Obstruction
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye and placebo in other eye. This arm will report systemic events that cannot be attributed to either intervention.
|
Part A Placebo Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for placebo eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving Placebo in one eye only.
|
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for elamipretide eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye only.
|
Part B Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving Placebo in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
|
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritis
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid Oedema
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye Pain
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Investigations
Vital dye staining cornea present
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Flutter
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increase
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Investigations
Vitamin B12 deficiency
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Onychoclasis
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardioversion
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Shoulder arthroplasty
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Eyelid Disorder
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract Cortical
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Diplopia
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
|
Additional Information
Jim Carr, Pharm.D. Chief Clinical Development Officer
Stealth BioTherapeutics, Inc
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60