Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED) (NCT NCT02653391)

NCT ID: NCT02653391

Last Updated: 2021-09-17

Results Overview

The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

22 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Results posted on

2021-09-17

Participant Flow

Part A 18 participants were randomized. The treatment eye was chosen at random and the fellow eye was the control/placebo eye. Part B The participants received either treatment in both eyes or placebo in both eyes.

Unit of analysis: eyes

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo Part A (Cohort 1)
Part A: Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 1.0% ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in the randomly selected study eye, and Placebo twice daily (BID) in the paired eye.
Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution Part B (Cohort 2)
Part B Each subject will receive one drop of elamipretide 3.0% ophthalmic solution twice daily (BID) in both the right and left study eyes (Cohort 2). Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Placebo Part B (Cohort 2)
Part B Each subject will receive one drop of placebo comparator solution twice daily (BID) in both the right and left study eyes (Cohort 2). Placebo Part B
Overall Study
STARTED
18 36
3 6
1 2
Overall Study
COMPLETED
16 32
1 2
1 2
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2 4
2 4
0 0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

A Study Investigating the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Elamipretide Topical Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Fuchs' Corneal Endothelial Dystrophy (FCED)

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving Elamipretide and placebo
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving Elamipretide.
Part B Placebo
n=1 Participants
Part B Participants include those receiving Placebo.
Total
n=22 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64 • n=5 Participants
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=7 Participants
NA years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=5 Participants
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Smoking
Former Smoker
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
Smoking
Current Smoker
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
Smoking
Never Smoker
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom ocular TEAEs were measured.

The incidence and severity of ocular treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
n=1 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular moderate TEAEs
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular severe TEAEs
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
Incidence and Severity of Ocular TEAEs.
Ocular mild TEAEs
3 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Screening Visit, Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom systemic TEAEs were measured. For Part A systemic events were not necessarily attributed to either intervention or placebo.

The incidence and severity of systemic treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=1 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
n=3 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic mild TEAEs
3 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic moderate TEAEs
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
The Incidence and Severity of Systemic Adverse Events
Systemic severe TEAEs
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured.

Number of participants who had a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part A. Part B is reported as separate outcome since unit of measure is number of eyes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 1
1 participants
1 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 8
1 participants
1 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 12
1 participants
1 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Cornea Week 16
1 participants
1 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Anterior Chamber Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Posterior Chamber Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Iris Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lens Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Lids Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part A
Conjunctiva Week 16
0 participants
0 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom slit lamp outcomes were measured with both baseline and post-baseline measurements.

Number of eyes with a change from baseline from normal or abnormal not clinically significant, to abnormal clinically significant (CS) findings for slit lamp examinations (SLE) for Part B. Part A is reported as separate outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=2 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=6 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lids Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 4
0 participants
2 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Conjunctiva Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 1
0 participants
6 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Cornea Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Anterior Chamber Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Posterior Chamber Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Iris Week 16
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 1
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 4
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 8
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 12
0 participants
0 participants
Change From Baseline in Findings From Slit Lamp Examinations (SLE) Part B
Lens Week 16
0 participants
0 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12

Population: All participants for whom intraocular pressure was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part A

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 1
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Error 0.64
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.49
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 4
-0.3 mmHg
Standard Error 0.47
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Error 0.31
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 8
-1.1 mmHg
Standard Error 0.47
-0.2 mmHg
Standard Error 0.64
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Week 12
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.45
-0.4 mmHg
Standard Error 0.43
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part A
Over All 12 Weeks
-0.6 mmHg
Standard Error 0.22
-0.3 mmHg
Standard Error 0.21

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 , and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom intraocular pressures were measured.

Change from Baseline in intraocular pressure (IOP) using Goldmann applanation tonometry for Part B. Part A is reported separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=2 Eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=6 Eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 1
3.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
0.2 mmHg
Standard Deviation 3.19
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 4
2.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.33
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 8
1.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
0.8 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.89
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 12
0.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 0.00
3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
Change From Baseline in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) for Part B
Week 16
3.5 mmHg
Standard Deviation 2.12
1.0 mmHg
Standard Deviation 1.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16

Population: All participants for whom central corneal thickness was measured. Part B is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

Change from Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit as measured by Pachymetry for Part A. Part B is reported as a separate outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 1
15.4 µm
Standard Deviation 47.95
7.2 µm
Standard Deviation 19.99
1.8 µm
Standard Deviation 19.72
2.0 µm
Standard Deviation 25.51
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 4
9.4 µm
Standard Deviation 19.61
6.1 µm
Standard Deviation 14.32
4.7 µm
Standard Deviation 21.20
4.8 µm
Standard Deviation 26.52
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 8
15.4 µm
Standard Deviation 16.04
13.1 µm
Standard Deviation 22.35
6.1 µm
Standard Deviation 15.23
7.6 µm
Standard Deviation 9.61
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 12
12.3 µm
Standard Deviation 30.31
2.1 µm
Standard Deviation 31.80
-1.8 µm
Standard Deviation 28.25
0.0 µm
Standard Deviation 25.87
Change From Baseline in Central Corneal Thickness by Visit Part A as Measured by Pachymetry for Part A
Week 16
13.7 µm
Standard Deviation 19.50
8.4 µm
Standard Deviation 17.09
6.3 µm
Standard Deviation 21.18
8.7 µm
Standard Deviation 27.75

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16, or Early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom Central Corneal Thickness was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure.

Central Corneal Thickness: by-subject data as measured by Pachymetry and Pentacam. Part A is reported as a separate outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4
650 µm
687.6 µm
656.3 µm
656.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
663 µm
660.6 µm
645 µm
642 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
626 µm
593 µm
604 µm
591.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1
619 µm
613 µm
633 µm
602.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201(Elamipretide) Week 4
623 µm
599 µm
646 µm
600.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8
608 µm
624.3 µm
607 µm
608.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12
617 µm
608.6 µm
623 µm
593.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16
604 µm
598.6 µm
620 µm
600.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
620 µm
627 µm
635 µm
622.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1
607 µm
618.3 µm
623 µm
617.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit
639 µm
621 µm
630 µm
622 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline (Day 1)
656 µm
618.3 µm
624 µm
604.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1
629 µm
616.6 µm
623 µm
608.3 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4
645 µm
631 µm
619 µm
626 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8
640 µm
646.3 µm
631 µm
645 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12
634 µm
645.3 µm
621 µm
637.6 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16
646 µm
638.3 µm
627 µm
630 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline (Day 1)
655 µm
652.6 µm
632 µm
632 µm
Central Corneal Thickness Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1
664 µm
655.6 µm
643 µm
626.3 µm

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, and 12

Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. Assessments were performed using the flex center and full auto methods for Part A and data from the flex center method was summarized. The flex center method was used for Part B. The percent of Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure. A decrease from baseline in % cell hexagonality means worse outcome, a increase from baseline means better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
-6.812 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 4.3912
-2.952 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 4.0223
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
1.518 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 7.1703
-3.155 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 7.2515
Change From Baseline Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
0.738 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 5.0322
-0.764 percentage of hexagonality
Standard Deviation 5.1291

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, and Week 16 or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. For images with poor quality or too few cells to register, there was no data available.

Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality in Percentage by-subject data: Part B. Data was only listed in weeks where images were good enough quality to quantify. Specular microscopy is a noninvasive photographic technique that allows visualization and analyzation the corneal endothelium. Using computer-assisted morphometry, specular microscopes analyzes the size, shape and population of the endothelial cells. Histologically, healthy corneal cells initially have a hexagonal shape. As endothelial cells die, neighboring cells enlarge to cover the empty space once occupied by the cell. This, in turn, causes the remaining cells to lose their hexagonal shape. The flex center method was used for Part B. A decrease in percent of cell hexagonality from baseline means worse outcome, an increase from baseline means better outcome.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
45.00 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
27.75 µm
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
39.50 µm
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
42.00 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
31.67 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
30.00 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
46.17 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
33.00 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
49.50 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
41.50 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
48.34 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
41.34 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
35.84 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
14.50 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
35.43 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
54.50 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
30.50 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
34.00 µm
Corneal Endothelial Cell Hexagonality Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
NA µm
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
50.00 µm

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome). Part B was listed separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 1
1.8 letters
Standard Deviation 3.51
2.3 letters
Standard Deviation 4.69
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 4
0.8 letters
Standard Deviation 5.67
-0.1 letters
Standard Deviation 8.96
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 8
2.5 letters
Standard Deviation 4.87
1.3 letters
Standard Deviation 8.11
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 12
2.6 letters
Standard Deviation 4.59
0.8 letters
Standard Deviation 6.72
Change From Baseline in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Scale for Part A.
Week 16
3.8 letters
Standard Deviation 5.33
2.6 letters
Standard Deviation 5.94

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom BCVA score was measured.

Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) using the using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) scale by visit. ETDRS charts present a series of five letters of equal difficulty on each row, with standardized spacing between letters and rows; there is a total of 14 lines (70 letters), with letter size increasing further geometrically and equivalently in every line by a factor of 1.2589 (or 0.1 log unit), moving up the chart. Minimum score of zero, maximum score of 100. Change from baseline: a more negative score is worse outcome, a more positive score is better outcome. A lower score means less letters were read correctly (worse outcome) and a higher score means more letters were read correctly (better outcome).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12
80 letters
69 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4
63 letters
36 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled
NA letters
Not measured
NA letters
Not measured
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline
66 letters
69 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1
62 letters
68 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4
64 letters
62 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8
67 letters
70 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12
68 letters
73 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16
62 letters
63 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline
63 letters
59 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1
60 letters
60 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled Visit
0 letters
0 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
60 letters
57 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline
79 letters
71 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1
78 letters
71 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4
79 letters
72 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8
76 letters
70 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16
81 letters
68 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline
68 letters
31 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1
69 letters
30 letters
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score Using ETDRS Scale for Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early Discontinuation
70 letters
37 letters

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12

Population: All participants for whom endothelial cell counts were measured. All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Counts, or density (Counts/mm\^2) over all 12 weeks for Part A. Part B is entered as a separate outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
11.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 224.89
-166.9 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 231.84
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
-68.9 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 114.22
-33.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 105.18
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Density Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
-38.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 162.07
-24.0 counts/mm^2
Standard Error 178.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16.

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were "poor quality images" and hence, no data was available.

Corneal Endothelial Cell Density: Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were "Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register", there were no data available, and these were not listed below.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1069.2 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
934.0 counts/mm^2
NA counts/mm^2
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
1449.0 counts/mm^2
NA counts/mm^2
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1241.7 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1087.7 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1149.5 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
773.2 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1094.5 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
897.3 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1361.2 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
971.5 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
995.2 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
961.3 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1046.7 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
826.0 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1195.2 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1068.3 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1213.3 counts/mm^2
Corneal Endothelial Cell Density Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
NA counts/mm^2
Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
1032.5 counts/mm^2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: All participants had images taken; data was analyzed for those whose images were of sufficient quality.

Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks. Coefficient of variation (CV) is Standard deviation (SD) of cell area divided by the mean cell area of endothelial cell analyzed. CV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells (polymegethism). By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. The more variation, the worse the outcome. Part B is is entered as a separate outcome measure.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Central Cornea
-7.644 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 7.7617
-7.941 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 8.0334
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Nasal Cornea
-3.809 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 3.9095
-4.293 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 3.6388
Change From Baseline in Endothelial Cell Coefficient of Variation Over All 12 Weeks for Part A
Temporal Cornea
7.823 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 5.0620
0.737 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Standard Deviation 5.0326

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8,12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom Corneal Endothelial Cell Counts/Density was measured. Part A is reported as a separate Outcome Measure. All images from Participant 205 were "poor quality images" and hence, no data was available.

Part B, By-subject data for all time points where images were readable. For all time points where there were "Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register" there were no data available. CoV represents the coefficient, or degree, of variation in the sizes of the endothelial cells. By measuring the variation in size between endothelial cells, the system can measure how much cell loss is occurring. A CoV less than 40 is normal.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Central Week 16
64.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
51.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Baseline (Day 1)
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
61.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 1
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
69.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 4
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
47.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 8
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
58.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 12
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
60.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Central Week 16
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
56.8 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Baseline (Day 1)
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
73.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 1
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
58.7 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 4
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
59.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 8
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
51.5 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 12
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
65.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Nasal Week 16
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
50.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Baseline (Day 1)
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
62.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 1
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
58.2 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 8
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
63.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 12
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
32.3 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
Coefficient of Variation (CoV) Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Temporal Week 16
NA SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)
"Poor Quality Images" or "too few cells to register"
63.0 SD of cell area/Mean cell area, (μm^2)

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.

Change from Baseline in corneal area affected by microcysts by visit for Part A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 Worsened
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 No Change
18 Participants
17 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 1 Improved
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 Worsened
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 No Change
17 Participants
17 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 4 Improved
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 Worsened
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 No Change
16 Participants
16 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 8 Improved
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 Worsened
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 No Change
15 Participants
14 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 12 Improved
0 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 Worsened
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 No Change
16 Participants
15 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts for Part A
Week 16 Improved
0 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal area affected by microcysts was measured.

Corneal area affected by microcysts: by-subject data for Part B. No microcysts were present for any timepoints.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) All visits
0 eyes
0 eyes
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) All visits
0 eyes
0 eyes
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 204 (Placebo) All visits
0 eyes
0 eyes
Corneal Area Affected by Microcysts: Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) All visits
0 eyes
0 eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.

Count of participants in number, size and location of bullae by treatment. Part B is listed separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central Inferior 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central Nasal 3 bullae >1mm, 8 bullae <0.5mm
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central (Superior) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
0 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Corneal Bullae for Part A.
Central (Temporal) 3 Bullae >1mm, 8 Bullae <0.5mm
0 Participants
1 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal bullae were measured.

Number, size and location of Corneal bullae: By-subject data: Part B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 eye
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eye
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide ) All weeks
0 number of corneal bullae
0 number of corneal bullae
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) All weeks
0 number of corneal bullae
0 number of corneal bullae
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) All weeks
0 number of corneal bullae
0 number of corneal bullae
Corneal Bullae: Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) All weeks
0 number of corneal bullae
0 number of corneal bullae

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16

Population: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.

Change from baseline in severity of corneal stromal folds by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator; severity is not assessed using a scale.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 Worsened
1 Participants
1 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 No Change
16 Participants
15 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 1 Improved
1 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 Worsened
1 Participants
0 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 No Change
14 Participants
14 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 4 Improved
2 Participants
3 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 Worsened
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 No Change
11 Participants
11 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 8 Improved
4 Participants
4 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 Worsened
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 No Change
10 Participants
12 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 12 Improved
4 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 Worsened
2 Participants
2 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 No Change
11 Participants
12 Participants
Change From Baseline in Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds for Part A
Week 16 Improved
3 Participants
2 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, and 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom corneal stromal folds was measured.

Severity of corneal stromal folds by-subject data by visit. Descriptive assessment made by Investigator in the following categories: Not present, trace, mild.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 eyes
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: trace
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Baseline-Mild
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 - Trace
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 1 -Mild
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 4 -Trace
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8-Mild
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 8- no folds
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12-Trace
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 12- no folds
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 -Trace
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 201 (Elamipretide) Week 16 - no folds present
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Baseline-no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Week 1: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Baseline- Trace
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 1: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 4: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 8: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 12: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 204 (Vehicle) Week 16: no folds present
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Baseline: Mild
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 1: Mild
1 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: no folds present
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Week 4: trace
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: No folds present
1 eyes
0 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Unscheduled visit: trace
0 eyes
1 eyes
Severity of Corneal Stromal Folds:Part B
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) Early discontinuation visit: no folds present
1 eyes
0 eyes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks

Population: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured

Change from Baseline in contrast sensitivity over all 12 weeks log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=18 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
3 cycles per degree
0.084 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0554
-0.013 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0499
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
6 cycles per degree
0.193 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0745
0.111 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0374
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
12 cycles per degree
0.050 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0787
0.013 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0503
Change From Baseline in Contrast Sensitivity (Log Score) for Part A
18 cycles per degree
0.122 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0637
0.080 log score
Standard Deviation 0.0564

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, or early discontinuation visit

Population: All participants for whom contrast sensitivity was measured.

Contrast Sensitivity log score at 3, 6, 12, 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using Vector Vision's CSV-1000E by-subject data, Part B. Part A is listed separately. Standard tables for the VectorVision's CSV-1000E model were used to convert linear results to the log values. Lower log scores equals lower contrast sensitivity and worse outcome. Higher log scores mean higher contrast sensitivity and better outcome. For 3cpd, range is 0.7-2.08; 6 cpd: 0.91-2.29; 12 cpd: 0.61-1.99; 18cpd: 0.17-1.55, unless no gratings were visible. If no gratings were visible, .3 log was subtracted from the lowest score for 3, 6, and 12cpd. For 18cpd .01 log was used, or essentially 100% contrast.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Part A Placebo
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving vehicle in eye paired with treatment eye.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=4 Participants
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide
Part B Placebo
Part B participants includes those receiving vehicle in both eyes.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
Part B Participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 4
0.01 log score
0.01 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Screening
0.70 log score
0.70 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Week 1
1.00 log score
1.00 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 3 cpd Early Discontinuation
0.70 log score
0.70 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Screening
0.61 log score
0.90 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Week 1
0.90 log score
1.20 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 6 cpd Early Discontinuation
0.61 log score
0.61 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline
0.60 log score
0.31 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 1
0.31 log score
0.60 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation
0.60 log score
0.60 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline
0.01 log score
0.18 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 1
0.01 log score
0.18 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 203 (Elamipretide) 18 cpd Early Discontinuation
0.01 log score
0.18 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Baseline
1.18 log score
1.18 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 1
1.63 log score
1.00 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 4
1.49 log score
1.34 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 8
1.49 log score
1.34 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 12
1.79 log score
1.63 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 3cpd Week 16
1.79 log score
1.34 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Baseline
1.38 log score
1.38 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 1
1.85 log score
1.20 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 4
1.38 log score
1.56 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 8
1.70 log score
1.20 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 12
1.70 log score
1.56 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 6cpd Week 16
2.00 log score
0.90 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Baseline
0.60 log score
0.60 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 1
1.08 log score
0.90 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 4
1.26 log score
1.08 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 8
0.60 log score
0.90 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 12
1.08 log score
0.60 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 12cpd Week 16
1.26 log score
0.60 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Baseline
0.65 log score
0.01 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 1
0.65 log score
0.18 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 4
0.65 log score
0.65 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 8
0.18 log score
0.48 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 12
0.65 log score
0.01 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 204 (Vehicle) 18cpd Week 16
0.65 log score
0.65 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Baseline
1.34 log score
0.40 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 1
1.18 log score
0.40 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Week 4
0.70 log score
0.40 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 3cpd Early Discontinuation
1.00 log score
0.40 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Baseline
0.90 log score
0.61 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 1
0.90 log score
0.61 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Week 4
0.61 log score
0.61 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 6cpd Early Discontinuation
0.61 log score
0.61 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Baseline
0.31 log score
0.31 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 1
1.26 log score
0.31 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Week 4
0.31 log score
0.31 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 12cpd Early Discontinuation
0.31 log score
0.31 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Baseline
0.01 log score
0.01 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Week 1
0.65 log score
0.01 log score
Contrast Sensitivity for Part B; By-subject Data
Participant 205 (Elamipretide) 18cpd Early Discontinuation
0.01 log score
0.01 log score

Adverse Events

Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part A Placebo Only

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 6 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part B Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye and placebo in other eye. This arm will report systemic events that cannot be attributed to either intervention.
Part A Placebo Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for placebo eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving Placebo in one eye only.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for elamipretide eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye only.
Part B Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving Placebo in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small Intestinal Obstruction
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution and Placebo
n=18 participants at risk
Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye and placebo in other eye. This arm will report systemic events that cannot be attributed to either intervention.
Part A Placebo Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for placebo eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving Placebo in one eye only.
Part A Elamipretide 1.0% Ophthalmic Solution Only
n=18 participants at risk
These will be reporting ocular AEs for elamipretide eye only. Part A participants includes those receiving 1% Elamipretide in one eye only.
Part B Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving Placebo in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
Part B Elamipretide 3.0% Ophthalmic Solution
n=3 participants at risk
Part B participants includes those receiving 3% Elamipretide in both eyes. This arm will be reporting ocular and systemic events.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Conjunctival Haemorrhage
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Eye pruritis
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Eyelid Oedema
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis allergic
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Nervous system disorders
Burning sensation
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Eye Pain
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Investigations
Vital dye staining cornea present
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial Flutter
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increase
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Investigations
Vitamin B12 deficiency
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
33.3%
1/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Onychoclasis
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Surgical and medical procedures
Cardioversion
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Surgical and medical procedures
Shoulder arthroplasty
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis superficial
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Eyelid Disorder
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Cataract Cortical
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Diplopia
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Ocular hyperaemia
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Eye disorders
Visual impairment
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
5.6%
1/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
General disorders
Pain
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
0.00%
0/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
11.1%
2/18 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
100.0%
1/1 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.
66.7%
2/3 • From the screening period (Day-28 to Day 1) to Week 16 follow up visit, approximately 5 months in total.

Additional Information

Jim Carr, Pharm.D. Chief Clinical Development Officer

Stealth BioTherapeutics, Inc

Phone: 1-617-600-6888

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: GT60