Safety Study of Efprezimod Alfa (CD24Fc, MK-7110) When Administered Intravenously in Healthy Adult Subjects (MK-7110-001)

NCT ID: NCT02650895

Last Updated: 2023-01-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-02

Study Completion Date

2015-01-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of single ascending intravenous (IV) doses of efprezimod alfa in healthy adult participants.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose study to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of efprezimod alfa in healthy male and female adult participants.

The population for this study was healthy males and females between the ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive, with a body mass index between 18 kg/m\^2 and 30 kg/m\^2, inclusive.

A total of 40 participants were enrolled in this study, in 5 cohorts of 8 participants each. Six of the 8 participants in each cohort received study drug and 2 participants received placebo (0.9% sodium chloride, saline). The first cohort was dosed with 10 mg. Succeeding cohorts received 30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg, and 240 mg of efprezimod alfa or matching placebo and were dosed at least 3 weeks apart to allow for review of safety and tolerability data for each prior cohort. Administration of the next higher dose to a new cohort of participants was permitted only if adequate safety and tolerability had been demonstrated.

In each cohort, the initial 2 participants were 1 study drug recipient and 1 placebo recipient on Day 1 (sentinel participants). Participants 3 to 5 and 6 to 8 were dosed after Day 7 (a minimum of 24 hours apart between the subgroups). Each participant was dosed at least 1 hour apart in the same subgroup. If necessary, dosing of the rest of the participants was delayed pending review of any significant safety issues that may have arisen during the post-dose period involving the first or second subgroups in that cohort. The subsequent cohort was dosed at least 3 weeks after the prior cohort.

The total study duration for each participant, including the screening period, was up to 63 days. Single dose administration occurred on Day 1.

The Screening Visit (Visit 1) occurred up to 21 days prior to the beginning of the active treatment period. After providing informed consent, participants underwent screening procedures for eligibility.

Participants were admitted to the Clinical Pharmacology Unit (CPU) on Day -1 (Visit 2), and the randomized treatment period began on Day 1 following a 10-hour minimum overnight fast. Participants were randomly assigned to treatment with efprezimod alfa or placebo as a single dose. Participants remained confined until the morning of Day 4.

All participants returned to the CPU on Day 7, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, and Day 42 (±1 day) for follow-up visits (Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, and Visit 7). Visit 7 was the final visit for all participants.

The assessment of safety was based primarily on the frequency of adverse events, clinical laboratory assessments (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs), and continuous telemetry monitoring. The Intent--to--treat (ITT) population was used for all summaries.

PK parameters were calculated using actual collection times. The PK parameters for efprezimod alfa were calculated from the individual serum concentrations profile by noncompartmental approaches.

The PK Evaluable Population was defined as all participants in the ITT Population who had evaluable concentration-time profiles for efprezimod alfa. The PK Evaluable Population was the population used for all PK analyses.

The PK listing, summary, and analysis were performed based on the serum concentration of efprezimod alfa by treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using actual collection times. The PK parameters for efprezimod alfa were calculated from the individual serum concentrations profile by non-compartmental approaches.

The concentration of efprezimod alfa was summarized descriptively at each nominal time point by treatment (e.g., n, mean, standard deviation \[SD\], coefficient of variation \[CV%\], standard error, median, minimum, and maximum). Mean concentration (±SD) was plotted on a linear scale against nominal time points by treatment. Geometric mean concentration was plotted on a semi-logarithmic scale against nominal time points. The PK Evaluable Population was used for the summary and individual concentrations.

Individual concentration-time curves for efprezimod alfa were plotted on both a linear and semi-logarithmic scale against actual sampling times by participant.

Pharmacokinetic parameters were summarized for the PK Evaluable Population. All parameters were summarized by treatment with the number of observations, mean, SD, CV%, standard error, median, maximum, and minimum. Geometric mean and geometric CV% were also provided for the summary of area of serum concentration versus time curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax).

Dose proportionality of efprezimod alfa serum PK parameters (AUC and Cmax) was assessed using the power model: y = a Dose β, where y denotes the PK parameter being analyzed and depends on participant. Dose proportionality implies that β = 1 and was assessed by estimated β along with its 90% confidence interval (CI). The exponent, β, in the power model was estimated by regressing the log-transformed PK parameter on log-transformed dose.

The power model was fitted by restricted maximum likelihood using Statistical Analysis System Mixed Model Procedures (SAS Proc Mixed). Both the intercept and slope were fitted as fixed effects. The mean slope was estimated from the power model and the corresponding 90% CI calculated.

The ITT Population consisted of all participants who received at least 1 dose of the study drug. The ITT Population was the primary analysis population for participant information and safety evaluation.

The assessment of safety was based primarily on the frequency and nature of adverse events, clinical laboratory assessments (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead ECGs, and telemetry monitoring. The ITT Population was used for all summaries.

All adverse events were summarized by system organ class, preferred term, and treatment. A list of participants who had serious adverse events (SAEs) and who discontinued from the study due to an adverse event was provided. The number and percentage of participants who experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) were presented for each system organ class and for each preferred term by treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events that were considered by the Investigator to be related to study drug were summarized in the same manner. Serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation from the study were listed separately.

Clinical laboratory evaluations (chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis) were summarized by treatment and visit. Change from baseline was also summarized. Vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and temperature) were summarized by treatment and time point. Change from baseline was also summarized. All physical examination data were listed. Electrocardiogram parameters and the change from baseline were summarized. Overall interpretations were listed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Volunteers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Efprezimod alfa

Single dose of efprezimod alfa is administrated as intravenous infusion in one hour. There are 5 dose cohorts, 10mg, 30mg, 60mg, 120mg, 240mg. Each cohort has 6 subjects in efprezimod alfa and 2 subject in placebo.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Efprezimod alfa

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Recombinant fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domain of mature human CD24 linked to the human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc domain

Saline

Single dose of 100 ml normal saline is administrated as intravenous infusion in one hour.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

0.9% sodium chloride

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Efprezimod alfa

Recombinant fusion protein consisting of the extracellular domain of mature human CD24 linked to the human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) Fc domain

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Saline

0.9% sodium chloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CD24IgG CD24Fc MK- 7110 Normal saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy male and female volunteers between the ages of 18 and 55 years, inclusive, in good health based on medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram (ECG), and routine laboratory tests (blood chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and drug screen). Any routine laboratory test could be repeated per Investigator judgment;
* Body mass index (BMI) between 18 kg/m2 and 30 kg/m2, inclusive;
* Participants must have been non-smokers or had quit smoking \>6 months prior to Screening;
* Women of childbearing potential with a negative urine pregnancy test at Screening who were not breastfeeding, did not plan to become pregnant during the study, and agreed to use dual methods of birth control during the study (i.e., 2 of the following: diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide, intrauterine device \[IUD\] hormonal contraceptives \[stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening\], male partner using condom with spermicide) from Day 1 until 60 days following the administration of study drug; or female participants of non-childbearing potential were either surgically sterile (hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral tubal ligation) or \>1 year post-menopausal with a follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the post menopausal range (post-menopausal taking hormone replacement therapy \[stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening\] did not require an FSH level);
* All male participants were required to use barrier contraception (condom with spermicide) in addition to having their female partner (if of childbearing potential) use another acceptable form of contraception (IUD, diaphragm with spermicide, hormonal contraceptives \[stable for at least 3 months prior to Screening\]) from Day 1 until 60 days following the last administration of study drug;
* Negative alcohol, cotinine, and drug screen;
* Willing to abstain from alcohol for 48 hours prior to any visit;
* Willing and able to be confined to the CPU as required by the protocol;
* Willing and able to comply with the investigational nature of the study and able to communicate well with the Principal Investigator and clinical staff; and
* Ability to comprehend and willingness to provide written informed consent in accordance with institutional and regulatory guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria

* Participants with evidence or history of clinically significant immunologic, hematologic, renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, psychiatric, neurologic, or allergic disease (including drug allergies), surgical conditions, cancer or any other condition that, in the Investigator's opinion, might significantly interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of the study drug;
* Participants who had received any investigational drug or device within 30 days or less than 5 half-lives of investigational drug prior to dosing;
* Participants taking any prescription or over-the-counter medications within 7 days prior to dosing, or were not willing to refrain from these medications throughout the study period;
* Participants who had a history of alcoholism or drug abuse within 2 years prior to dosing;
* Participants with a typical consumption of 14 alcoholic drinks weekly;
* Participants who had a history of or positive tests for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV), or participants who had a positive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at Screening;
* Participants who had donated blood or blood products within 30 days prior to dosing;
* Participants with inadequate venous access;
* Participants with an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \>2 the upper limit of normal (ULN) at Screening or Day -1;
* Participants with a total bilirubin \>1.5 ULN at Screening or Day -1;
* Participants who were currently undergoing treatment with weight loss medication or prior weight loss surgery (e.g., gastric bypass surgery);
* Participants who had poor mental function or any other reason to expect participant difficulty in complying with the requirements of the study; or
* Participants who had a history or presence of any medical condition or disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with the conduct of the study or would put the participant at unacceptable risk.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oncoimmune, Inc., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA)

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medpace Clinical Pharmacology Unit (CPU)

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang X, Liu M, Zhang J, Brown NK, Zhang P, Zhang Y, Liu H, Du X, Wu W, Devenport M, Tao W, Mao-Draayer Y, Chen GY, Chen YE, Zheng P, Liu Y. CD24-Siglec axis is an innate immune checkpoint against metaflammation and metabolic disorder. Cell Metab. 2022 Aug 2;34(8):1088-1103.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2022.07.005.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35921817 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://merckoncologyclinicaltrials.com

Description: Merck Oncology Clinical Trials Information

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01NS080821

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

CD24Fc-001

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

7110-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anti-MAG First Administration to Human
NCT00622609 COMPLETED PHASE1
Phase 1 Single Ascending Dose Study
NCT06934941 RECRUITING PHASE1