Trial Outcomes & Findings for Nanopulse Efficacy Study for the Treatment of Common Warts (NCT NCT02650466)
NCT ID: NCT02650466
Last Updated: 2019-08-06
Results Overview
Response rate is defined in each case in terms of no effect (NE=2), partial response (PR=1), or complete response (CR=0). No Effect (NE) would indicate no clinically apparent reduction in lesion size, Partial Response (PR) would indicate a reduction in lesion size, and Complete Response (CR) would indicate no evidence of the lesion detected.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
168 days after first treatment application
2019-08-06
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Nanopulse Treatment
The study will be a single center, open label, non-randomized clinical trial that will provide efficacy data for the treatment of common warts by the Nanopulse system in terms of efficacy and cosmetic outcome with 1 - 4 application (treatment) sessions. All subjects will receive a minimum number of applications (n=1 application) per discrete skin wart lesion. Up to 4 warts per subject will be treated with the Nanopulse device. The wart will be debulked to the point of pinpoint bleeding prior to the initial application. The subject will return after 1 week for an evaluation visit and at 4 weeks for a second treatment and 2 additional monthly treatments if warranted. If the subject is declared clinically clear at any of the application visits, they will be placed into follow up. They will return at the 12 week point post last visit for final assessment and evaluation.
Nanopulse System: The Nanopulse System consists of an electrical
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Nanopulse Treatment
The study will be a single center, open label, non-randomized clinical trial that will provide efficacy data for the treatment of common warts by the Nanopulse system in terms of efficacy and cosmetic outcome with 1 - 4 application (treatment) sessions. All subjects will receive a minimum number of applications (n=1 application) per discrete skin wart lesion. Up to 4 warts per subject will be treated with the Nanopulse device. The wart will be debulked to the point of pinpoint bleeding prior to the initial application. The subject will return after 1 week for an evaluation visit and at 4 weeks for a second treatment and 2 additional monthly treatments if warranted. If the subject is declared clinically clear at any of the application visits, they will be placed into follow up. They will return at the 12 week point post last visit for final assessment and evaluation.
Nanopulse System: The Nanopulse System consists of an electrical
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
5
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Nanopulse Efficacy Study for the Treatment of Common Warts
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Nanopulse Treatment
n=30 number of warts treated
The Nanopulse System consists of an electrical pulse generator, a handpiece, and a detachable applicator tip at the end of the handpiece that interfaces with the treatment area on the skin. The applicator tip delivers pulses to the skin through needle electrodes. The Applicator Tips are designed for single patient use, and are sterilized prior to first use and between treatment sessions using a standard steam autoclave.
All subjects will receive a minimum number of applications per discrete skin wart lesion (n=1 application). Up to 4 warts per subject will be treated. The wart will be debulked prior to the initial application. The subject will return after 1 week for an evaluation visit, at 4 weeks for a second treatment and up to 2 additional monthly treatments. Subjects will be evaluated at each application visit and placed in follow-up when they are declared clinically clear. They will return at the 12 week point post last visit for final assessment and evaluation.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian (non-Hispanic)
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic Latino
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African-American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian/SE Islan
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
24 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 168 days after first treatment applicationPopulation: The total number of participants who completed the study equals 17. But because one participant had 3 warts that received treated with differing results, they are counted twice (for that participant, one wart cleared and two showed no effect).
Response rate is defined in each case in terms of no effect (NE=2), partial response (PR=1), or complete response (CR=0). No Effect (NE) would indicate no clinically apparent reduction in lesion size, Partial Response (PR) would indicate a reduction in lesion size, and Complete Response (CR) would indicate no evidence of the lesion detected.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Partially Removed(1)
n=19 # of warts treated
wart size has been reduced in height and width during treatment.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Clearance of Warts
No Effect
|
2 # of warts
|
|
Clinical Clearance of Warts
Cleared
|
13 # of warts
|
|
Clinical Clearance of Warts
Partially Removed
|
4 # of warts
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: an average of 140 daysPopulation: During initial treatment of a wart on a digit, mild pain radiated up the finger from the wart at time of treatment. The pain persisted for 30min. P.O. Tylenol was provided at the time treatment. This did not re-occur during treatments 2,3 and 4.
Number of participants who experience an adverse event, regardless of whether they completed the study, will be aggregated through study completion. Both anticipated and unanticipated adverse events will be reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Partially Removed(1)
n=30 # of warts treated
wart size has been reduced in height and width during treatment.
|
|---|---|
|
Total Number of Adverse Events That Occur During the Course of the Study
|
1 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: an average of 140 daysNumber of participants, regardless of whether they completed the study, who experience serious adverse events will be aggregated through study completion from the clinical report forms and reported at the end of the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Partially Removed(1)
n=24 Participants
wart size has been reduced in height and width during treatment.
|
|---|---|
|
Total Number of Serious Adverse Events That Occur During the Course of the Study
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Nanopulse Treatment
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Nanopulse Treatment
n=24 participants at risk
|
|---|---|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Local Sensory Abnormality
|
4.2%
1/24 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Event data (including serious adverse event data) from 24 participants was collected on average for: 209 days (Range: 168-300 days) for the 17 participants who completed the study; and, 79 days (Range:0-217 days) from the 7 participants who did not complete the study.
For each adverse event, the details of and circumstances will be recorded at the site and evaluated by the investigator in terms of relatedness, seriousness and the degree to which the event was anticipated.The adverse event will be reported to the sponsor and the Institutional Review Board; and will be followed by study personnel through to its resolution. All unanticipated adverse reactions, regardless of their severity, will be recorded as adverse events and reported to the sponsor.
|
Additional Information
Cesar E. Blanco,PhD; Sr Director R&D
Alfred E. Mann Insitute at the University of Southern California
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place