A 26-week Extension of the ZRHR-ERS-09-US Study Evaluating Biological and Functional Changes in Healthy Smokers After Switching to THS 2.2
NCT ID: NCT02649556
Last Updated: 2020-12-04
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
672 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2017-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The subjects in the Full Analysis Set - As Exposed (FAS-EX) included subjects for combined analyses from the original six month study (ZRHR-ERS-09-US ) who did not enter the extension study (ZRHR-ERS-09-EXT-US).
This study was conducted as a separate investigation, as a follow-up of the randomized exposure period of the original study, extending the exposure from Week 26 (Visit 10 \[V10\]) to Week 52 (Visit 16 \[V16\]), and using the same sites.
Subjects continued to use the product they were randomized to in the original study ZRHR-ERS-09-US (THS 2.2 arm or CC arm).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
THS 2.2
Ad libitum use of THS 2.2
THS 2.2
Ad libitum use of THS 2.2 in an ambulatory setting for 26 weeks.
CC
Ad libitum use of CC
CC
Ad libitum use of CC in an ambulatory setting for 26 weeks.
The subject's own preferred brands of CC (no brand restriction) continue to be used as the reference product.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
THS 2.2
Ad libitum use of THS 2.2 in an ambulatory setting for 26 weeks.
CC
Ad libitum use of CC in an ambulatory setting for 26 weeks.
The subject's own preferred brands of CC (no brand restriction) continue to be used as the reference product.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The subject is willing to comply to study procedures and to continue to use the product he/she was allocated to during the original study (THS 2.2 or CC) for an additional 26 weeks at V10.
* Subject has given written informed consent to enter the 26-week extension study at V10.
Exclusion Criteria
* As per judgment of the PI(s) or designee(s), the subject cannot participate in the study for any reason (e.g. medical, psychiatric and/or social reason).
* Subject has made an attempt to quit using tobacco-containing products (e.g. CC and THS 2.2) during the original study.
* Female subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
* Female subject who does not agree to use an acceptable method of effective contraception.
30 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Philip Morris Products S.A.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christelle Haziza, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Philip Morris Products S.A.
Danielle Armas, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Celerion Arizona
Leonard Dunn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research West Florida
Hugh Coleman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Covance
George Stoica, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Compass Research
Mark Adams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Central Kentucky Research Associate
Peter Davidson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Celerion Lincoln
John Rubino, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Raleigh
George Raad, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Charlotte
Kevin Cannon, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Wilmington
Derek Schroder, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Cary
Stephanie Powell, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
PMG Research of Bristol
William Smith, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NOCCR
Darrell Herrington, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Benchmark
Laurence Chu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Benchmark
William Seger, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Benchmark
David Subich, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Compass Research
Lon Lynn, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Clinical Research West Florida
Isabel Kuhare-Arcure, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Midwest Clinical Research
Keith Scott, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Clinical Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Celerion Arizona
Tempe, Arizona, United States
Clinical Research West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Covance, Inc
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Compass Research
Orlando, Florida, United States
Clinical Research West Florida
Tampa, Florida, United States
Compass Research
The Villages, Florida, United States
Central Kentucky Research Associate
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Celerion Lincoln
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
PMG Research of Cary
Cary, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Raleigh
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
PMG Research of Wilmington
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Midwest Clinical Research
Dayton, Ohio, United States
PMG Research of Bristol
Bristol, Tennessee, United States
NOCCR
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Benchmark
Austin, Texas, United States
Benchmark
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Benchmark
San Angelo, Texas, United States
National Clinical Research
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ansari SM, Hession PS, David M, Blanc N, de La Bourdonnaye G, Pouly S, Haziza C. Impact of switching from cigarette smoking to tobacco heating system use on biomarkers of potential harm in a randomized trial. Biomarkers. 2024 Jul;29(5):298-314. doi: 10.1080/1354750X.2024.2358318. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZRHR-ERS-09-EXT-US
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ZRHR-ERS-09-EXT-US
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id