Trial Outcomes & Findings for Investigation of the Effect of Short-term Orthokeratology With Increased Compression Factor on Ocular Parameters (NCT NCT02643875)
NCT ID: NCT02643875
Last Updated: 2020-09-18
Results Overview
Maximum plus for maximum visual acuity was used as the criterion for subjective refraction. Spherical equivalent refraction was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
baseline and one month
2020-09-18
Participant Flow
All subjects who passed the inclusion and exclusion criteria at the baseline visit would be assigned to the treatment for each eye according to the randomization log.
Unit of analysis: eyes
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Orthokeratology Lenses With Different Compression Factors
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
36 72
|
|
Overall Study
Received 0.75
|
36 36
|
|
Overall Study
Received 1.75 D
|
36 36
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
28 56
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
8 16
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Orthokeratology Lenses With Different Compression Factors
n=56 eyes
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
9.3 years
n=28 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
12 Participants
n=28 Participants
|
|
Spherical equivalent refraction
Conventional compression factor (0.75 D)
|
2.12 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.94 • n=28 eyes • Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|
Spherical equivalent refraction
Increased compression factor (1.75 D)
|
2.09 D
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97 • n=28 eyes • Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and one monthPopulation: Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
Maximum plus for maximum visual acuity was used as the criterion for subjective refraction. Spherical equivalent refraction was calculated by adding the sum of the sphere power with half of the cylinder power.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Orthokeratology Lenses With Different Compression Factors
n=56 eyes
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Spherical Equivalent Refraction
Conventional compression factor (0.75 D)
|
2.31 D
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
|
Changes in Spherical Equivalent Refraction
Increased compression factor (1.75 D)
|
2.52 D
Standard Deviation 0.85
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and one monthPopulation: Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
The subfoveal choroidal thickness was determined as the thickness between the outer retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane complex and the inner chorioscleral interface.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Orthokeratology Lenses With Different Compression Factors
n=56 eyes
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness
Conventional compression factor (0.75 D)
|
-1 um
Standard Deviation 30
|
|
Changes in Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness
Increased compression factor (1.75 D)
|
-6 um
Standard Deviation 30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: baseline and one monthPopulation: Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
Ocular higher order aberrations were measured using Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. The wavefront data was fitted with a sixth order Zernike polynomial over a 5-mm pupil size.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Orthokeratology Lenses With Different Compression Factors
n=56 eyes
Orthokeratology lenses with different compression factors (one eye with 0.75 D and the fellow eye with 1.75 D) were randomly assigned to each subject.
|
|---|---|
|
Changes in Higher Order Aberrations
Increased compression factor (1.75 D)
|
0.1870 um
Standard Error 0.03
|
|
Changes in Higher Order Aberrations
Conventional compression factor (0.75 D)
|
0.2830 um
Standard Error 0.03
|
Adverse Events
Conventional Compression Factor (0.75 D)
Increased Compression Factor (1.75 D)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Prof Pauline Cho
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place