The Efficacy and Safety of Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, vs Clonidine Hydrochloride Gel Comparator to Treat Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
NCT ID: NCT02643251
Last Updated: 2017-09-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
138 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2016-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel,0.1%
Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel,0.1%
Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, 0.1%
Clonidine Gel is supplied as an aqueous gel formulation for topical use.
Clonidine Hydrochloride Gel Comparator
Clonidine Hydrochloride Gel Comparator
Clonidine Hydrochloride Gel Comparator
Clonidine Gel Comparator is supplied as an aqueous gel formulation for topical use.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Clonidine Hydrochloride Topical Gel, 0.1%
Clonidine Gel is supplied as an aqueous gel formulation for topical use.
Clonidine Hydrochloride Gel Comparator
Clonidine Gel Comparator is supplied as an aqueous gel formulation for topical use.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject is an outpatient ≥18 years of age at the time of the Screening Visit.
3. Subject has Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus with a hemoglobin A1C value \< 10% and has been stable on therapy (diet, oral anti-hyperglycemic, and/or insulin) for at least six (6) months prior to the Screening Visit.
4. Subject is a male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female. Females must be practicing an acceptable method of birth control or be surgically sterile or postmenopausal (amenorrhea for ≥12 months). A negative pregnancy test at the Screening and Day 1 visits is required for females of child-bearing potential. Double-barrier methods, hormonal contraceptives, and abstinence are acceptable birth control methods for this study.
5. Subject has chronic pain attributable to a symmetrical stocking distribution neuropathy in the lower extremities for at least six (6) months. Pain should be clearly localized to the area of neuropathy (feet), and subjects should be able to distinguish the target pain from other painful areas and conditions.
6. Subject has an average pain score relevant to the target pain in the feet of ≥4 on an 11 point numerical pain rating scale over the previous 24 hours at the Screening Visit.
7. Subject meets a pre-specified, minimum numerical pain rating scale score following capsaicin skin challenge.
8. Subject must satisfactorily complete Accurate Pain Reporting and Minimizing Placebo Response Training.
9. Subject must have moderate to severe pain during the Screening Run-in Phase.
10. Subjects must be 75 to 110% compliant with application of study drug during the Screening Run-in Phase
11. Subject has been medically stable for at least 30 days prior to the Screening Visit, and in the opinion of the Investigator, is in otherwise good general health based on medical history, physical examination, electrocardiogram, and laboratory evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Subject has a significant neurological disorder or condition that might confound assessment of painful diabetic neuropathy (e.g., stroke with distal neurological deficit, mononeuritis multiplex, lumbar radiculopathy).
3. Subject has a confounding disorder as determined by the Algorithm for Excluding Disorders that Masquerade as Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.
4. Subject has other sustained pain with intensity at or greater than the bilateral neuropathic pain in the feet.
5. Subject is using an implanted medical device (e.g., spinal cord stimulator, intrathecal pump, or peripheral nerve stimulator) for treatment of pain.
6. Subject is hypotensive with a resting diastolic blood pressure \<60 mm Hg or a systolic blood pressure \<90 mm Hg at the Screening or Day 1 Visit.
7. The subject has recent history (within the past 3 months) or current symptoms of orthostatic hypotension.
8. Subject has a history of foot or toe amputation or an active foot or toe ulcer.
9. Subject has any significant or unstable medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with his/her ability to participate in the study.
10. Subject has a history of substance abuse disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, within the past year, has current evidence of substance abuse disorder, is receiving medical treatment for drug abuse, or has a positive urine drug screen for a non-prescribed substance of abuse.
11. Subject is receiving or has received within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit any prohibited medications or is anticipated to receive after the start of the trial any new prescription medication for their painful diabetic neuropathy. Subjects may be enrolled if stable on therapy for painful diabetic neuropathy.
12. Subject has symptomatic or severe coronary insufficiency, clinically significant cardiac conduction disturbances, myocardial infarction (within last 12 months), moderate to severe cerebrovascular disease, or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
13. Subject has estimated creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min (Cockcroft Gault) at the Screening Visit.
14. Subject has serum alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST) \>3.0 times the upper limit of normal or total bilirubin concentrations \>2.0 times the upper limit of normal at the Screening Visit.
15. Subject has received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
16. Subject has been treated previously with clonidine topical gel or participated in a clonidine topical gel clinical study, including Study CLO 290.
17. Subject is currently taking or has taken clonidine (any formulation) over the past 4 weeks.
18. Subject has known hypersensitivity or intolerance to clonidine.
19. Subject is receiving or has received ≤7 days prior to the start of the Screening Phase "alternative medicine" products or treatments (e.g., acupuncture, naturopathy, homeopathy, etc.) for management of pain.
20. Subject has a history of malignancy within the past 5 years except for successfully treated non-metastatic basal cell or squamous cell carcinomas of the skin and/or localized carcinoma in situ of the cervix.
21. Subject is planning to have surgery during the course of the study.
22. Subject has significant skin changes on physical examination associated with either pedal edema or venous stasis disease.
23. Subject has any dermatologic condition of the lower extremities that could affect study drug absorption
24. Subject has current symptoms of depression with a Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI II) score \>19 at the Screening Visit.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
BioDelivery Sciences International
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aziz Shaibani, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nerve and Muscule Center of Texas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glendale, Arizona, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Anaheim, California, United States
Norco, California, United States
Sacramento, California, United States
Santa Monica, California, United States
Tustin, California, United States
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Ocala, Florida, United States
Orlando, Florida, United States
Tampa, Florida, United States
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Blackfoot, Idaho, United States
Boise, Idaho, United States
Belleville, Illinois, United States
Blue Island, Illinois, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CLO-291
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id