Pertuzumab in First Line Treatment of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT02642458
Last Updated: 2020-02-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
300 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-03-31
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This non-interventional approach aims to confirm the clinically relevant outcomes shown in the phase III CLEOPATRA study in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in routine practice. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.
Data on efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life will be documented for this purpose. Following the recommendations as laid down in guidelines for treatment of breast cancer, the quality of life of patients will be assessed on a regular basis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Pertuzumab-Trastuzumab and Taxane in the Standard Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT03979911
Capecitabine Plus Pyrotinib Versus Capecitabine Plus Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the First-line Treatment of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT04246502
Intrathecal Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in Patients With New Untreated Asymptomatic or Low Symptomatic Brain Metastasis in HER2 Positive Breast Cancer
NCT02598427
Gemcitabine, Trastuzumab, and Pertuzumab in the Treatment of Metastatic HER2-Positive Breast Cancer After Prior Trastuzumab/Pertuzumab, or Pertuzumab Based Therapy
NCT02252887
A Study of a Combination of Trastuzumab and Capecitabine With or Without Pertuzumab in Patients With HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer (PHEREXA)
NCT01026142
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In developed countries most breast cancers (in 94%-95% of patients in the EU and USA) are diagnosed while the tumour is confined to the breast - with or without locoregional lymph node involvement. At this early breast cancer (EBC) stage the disease is normally operable and can be treated curatively. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is less common and occurs in 5%-6% of newly diagnosed cases. Despite advances in the treatment of EBC approximately 30% of women develop local recurrence or metastases. In the USA and Europe patients with MBC survive for a mean 24 months and have a 5 year survival rate of 18%-23%.
Between 18% and 20% of breast cancers show HER2 amplification and/or HER2 receptor overexpression. Such patients have a poor prognosis on conventional treatment. The HER2 receptor is a protein belonging to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family. The HER family consists of four structurally similar receptors - HER1/EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4 - and regulates cell processes such as differentiation, invasion, proliferation, neoangiogenesis, survival and metastatic potential. In breast cancer HER2 positivity is associated with more aggressive tumours, higher relapse rates, lower and shorter treatment response and increased mortality.
Systemic treatment options in MBC include chemotherapy along with hormonal and targeted approaches. Tumor properties and patient-specific factors determine the choice of treatment.
In HER2-positive MBC trastuzumab for many years was the reference first-line treatment. Treatment-naive HER2-positive patients with MBC treated with trastuzumab and taxane chemotherapy showed significantly longer median time to progression (TTP), higher objective response rates (ORR) and longer median response and median survival than patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Although trastuzumab has proved effective in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive MBC, approximately 50% of patients experience disease progression within one year of starting treatment. Mean survival in HER2-positive patients in the pivotal studies of trastuzumab in combination with a taxane was 24.8 and 31.2 months.
Therefore there is high medical need for novel HER2-targeted therapies to improve survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive MBC.
An essential step in activating downstream signalling pathways is homo or heterodimerisation of the HER2 receptor with the other member of the HER family. Inhibition of HER2 dimerisation inhibits the downstream signalling pathways that mediate cancer cell proliferation and survival. Pertuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, is the first HER2 dimerisation inhibitor (HDI). It binds specifically to the extracellular dimerisation domain of the HER2 receptor, thereby inhibiting ligand-dependent heterodimerisation of the receptor with other HER family members. Pertuzumab actually inhibits ligand-activated intracellular signal transduction in two main signalling pathways - the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Inhibition of these signalling pathways can arrest cell growth and cause apoptosis. Pertuzumab also mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Pertuzumab and trastuzumab bind to different epitopes on the HER2 receptor. Their mechanisms of action complement each other to ensure more comprehensive blockade of HER2-dependent signalling pathways.
The phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical CLEOPATRA trial compared pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel vs placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in 808 patients with HER2-positive metastatic, locally recurrentor inoperable breast cancer. Patients may have received one hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer before randomization. Patients may have received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab before randomization, with an interval of at least 12 months between completion of the adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy and the diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Randomised patients were stratified by previous treatment status (with or without previous adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy) and geographic location (Europe, North America, South America and Asia). Pertuzumab was given intravenously at a starting dose of 840 mg followed by a dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks. Trastuzumab was given intravenously at a starting dose of 8 mg/kg followed by a dose of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients were treated with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab until disease progression, withdrawal of consent to participation or the development of uncontrollable toxicity. Docetaxel was given as an intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. If the starting dose was well-tolerated, the dose of docetaxel could be increased up to 100 mg/m² at the investigator's discretion.
The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review facility (IRF) and defined as the interval between randomisation and disease progression or death (from any cause), where death occurred within 18 weeks of the last disease assessment. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), (investigator-rated) PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response and time to progression (TTP).
Demographic characteristics were evenly balanced (mean age was 54 years, most \[59%\] were Caucasian and all but two were female). In each treatment group approximately half the patients had hormone (estrogen or progesterone) receptor-positive disease and had received previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy (184 patients \[45.8%\] in the pertuzumab group vs 192 patients \[47.3%\] in the placebo group). Most (37.3% and 40.4%, respectively) had previously received anthracyclines and approximately 10% had previously received trastuzumab (11.7% and 10.1%). A total 43% of patients from both groups had received prior radiotherapy. The mean baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 64.8% in the pertuzumab group and 65.6% in the placebo group (median 65.0%, range 50%-88% in the two groups).
The CLEOPATRA study showed statistically significant improvement of IRF-rated PFS in the pertuzumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio \[HR\]=0.62; 95% CI=0.51; 0.75, p\<0.0001) and an increase in median PFS of 6.1 months. Median PFS was 18.5 months in the pertuzumab group vs 12.4 months in the placebo group. Moreover, CLEOPATRA showed statistically significant improvement of overall survival in the pertuzumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio \[HR\]=0.68; 95% CI=0.56; 0.84, p\<0.0002) and an increase in median OS of 15.7 months. Median OS was 56.5 months in the pertuzumab group vs 40.8 months in the placebo group.
Despite the clear benefit of a combination therapy of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel when compared with a combination therapy of trastuzumab and docetaxel the study populations of the CLEOPATRA study might be slightly different from a patient population, in which pertuzumab, plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel or trastuzumab plus docetaxel are applied in routine clinical practice.
This non-interventional approach aims to confirm the clinically relevant outcomes shown in the phase III CLEOPATRA study in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in routine practice. Data on efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life will be documented for this purpose.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
trastuzumab plus chemotherapy
Treatment with trastuzumab plus chemotherapie as first line therapy, administered intravenously/subcutaneously in a three weekly frequency. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy
Treatment with with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first line therapy, administered intravenously/subcutaneously in a three weekly frequency. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable HER2-positive breast cancer proven by clinical measures (i.e. standard imaging) in first line treatment (Locally recurrent disease must not be amenable to resection with curative intent)
* Patients who are eligible for treatment with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy or pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first line therapy, administered intravenously in a three weekly frequency, according to each center's medical practice. The first line anti-HER2 treatment must not have started more than 28 days before study entry.
* No prior chemotherapy or HER2-directed therapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease, prior therapy for early breast cancer (eBC) is allowed
* Signed informed consent prior to onset of documentation.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital Tuebingen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Diethelm Wallwiener, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
Peter Fasching, Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen
Sara Brucker, Prof. Dr.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Universitäts-Frauenklinik
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Klinikum für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Esslingen
Esslingen am Neckar, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
NCT Heidelberg
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Frauenklinik des Städtischen Klinikums
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
St. Vicentius Kliniken Karlsruhe gAG Frauenklininik
Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Ortenau Klinikum Lahr-Ettenheim
Lahr, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Praxisklinik am Rosengarten
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Klinikum Mannheim, Universitäts-Frauenklinik
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen
Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Onkokom GbR
Altötting, Bavaria, Germany
MVZ Amberg
Amberg, Bavaria, Germany
Klinikum Augsburg Frauenklinik
Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany
Rottal-Inn-Kliniken GmbH
Eggenfelden, Bavaria, Germany
Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen
Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany
Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis
Kronach, Bavaria, Germany
Klinikum Nürnberg AöR
Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany
Hochschulklinikum der Med. Hochschule Brandenburg
Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany
g.SUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum
Stralsund, Brandenburg, Germany
Klinikum Darmstadt, Frauenklinik
Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany
Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany
MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Goslar, Hesse, Germany
Frauenklinik Wetzlar
Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany
Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg/Wümme gGmbH
Rotenburg (Wümme), Lower Saxony, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis f. Hämatologie u. Onkologie
Westerstede, Lower Saxony, Germany
Facharztzentrum am Schloß
Wolfenbüttel, Lower Saxony, Germany
MarienHospital Onkologische Praxis
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH
Bottrop, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe des Universitätsklinikums Köln Brustzentrum
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Essen
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Schwerpunktpraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie Hansen/Reeb/Pfitzner-Dempfle/Stehle
Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany
Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH Frauenklinik
Chemnitz, Saxony, Germany
Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Universitäres Krebszentrum Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, Germany
Gemeinschaftspraxis
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
MediOnko-Institut GbT
Berlin, , Germany
Onkologisch-Hämatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
Bremen, , Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SEN2015-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.