Pertuzumab in First Line Treatment of HER2-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT02642458

Last Updated: 2020-02-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite the clear benefit of a combination therapy of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel when compared with a combination therapy of trastuzumab and docetaxel the study populations of the CLEOPATRA trial might be slightly different from a patient population, in which pertuzumab, plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy or trastuzumab plus chemotherapy are applied in routine clinical practice.

This non-interventional approach aims to confirm the clinically relevant outcomes shown in the phase III CLEOPATRA study in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in routine practice. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.

Data on efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life will be documented for this purpose. Following the recommendations as laid down in guidelines for treatment of breast cancer, the quality of life of patients will be assessed on a regular basis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women worldwide with an estimated 1.4 million new diagnoses in 2008 and 1.6 million cases estimated for 2015. In 2008 breast cancer was responsible for approximately 23% of all new cancer diagnoses in women. It is also the commonest cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide: in 2008 some 458,500 women died from breast cancer, with a further 538,500 projected for 2015.

In developed countries most breast cancers (in 94%-95% of patients in the EU and USA) are diagnosed while the tumour is confined to the breast - with or without locoregional lymph node involvement. At this early breast cancer (EBC) stage the disease is normally operable and can be treated curatively. Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is less common and occurs in 5%-6% of newly diagnosed cases. Despite advances in the treatment of EBC approximately 30% of women develop local recurrence or metastases. In the USA and Europe patients with MBC survive for a mean 24 months and have a 5 year survival rate of 18%-23%.

Between 18% and 20% of breast cancers show HER2 amplification and/or HER2 receptor overexpression. Such patients have a poor prognosis on conventional treatment. The HER2 receptor is a protein belonging to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family. The HER family consists of four structurally similar receptors - HER1/EGFR, HER2, HER3, HER4 - and regulates cell processes such as differentiation, invasion, proliferation, neoangiogenesis, survival and metastatic potential. In breast cancer HER2 positivity is associated with more aggressive tumours, higher relapse rates, lower and shorter treatment response and increased mortality.

Systemic treatment options in MBC include chemotherapy along with hormonal and targeted approaches. Tumor properties and patient-specific factors determine the choice of treatment.

In HER2-positive MBC trastuzumab for many years was the reference first-line treatment. Treatment-naive HER2-positive patients with MBC treated with trastuzumab and taxane chemotherapy showed significantly longer median time to progression (TTP), higher objective response rates (ORR) and longer median response and median survival than patients treated with chemotherapy alone. Although trastuzumab has proved effective in combination with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive MBC, approximately 50% of patients experience disease progression within one year of starting treatment. Mean survival in HER2-positive patients in the pivotal studies of trastuzumab in combination with a taxane was 24.8 and 31.2 months.

Therefore there is high medical need for novel HER2-targeted therapies to improve survival outcomes in patients with HER2-positive MBC.

An essential step in activating downstream signalling pathways is homo or heterodimerisation of the HER2 receptor with the other member of the HER family. Inhibition of HER2 dimerisation inhibits the downstream signalling pathways that mediate cancer cell proliferation and survival. Pertuzumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody, is the first HER2 dimerisation inhibitor (HDI). It binds specifically to the extracellular dimerisation domain of the HER2 receptor, thereby inhibiting ligand-dependent heterodimerisation of the receptor with other HER family members. Pertuzumab actually inhibits ligand-activated intracellular signal transduction in two main signalling pathways - the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and the phosphoinositide-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway. Inhibition of these signalling pathways can arrest cell growth and cause apoptosis. Pertuzumab also mediates antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC). Pertuzumab and trastuzumab bind to different epitopes on the HER2 receptor. Their mechanisms of action complement each other to ensure more comprehensive blockade of HER2-dependent signalling pathways.

The phase III, multicentre, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled clinical CLEOPATRA trial compared pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel vs placebo plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel in 808 patients with HER2-positive metastatic, locally recurrentor inoperable breast cancer. Patients may have received one hormonal treatment for metastatic breast cancer before randomization. Patients may have received adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab before randomization, with an interval of at least 12 months between completion of the adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy and the diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Randomised patients were stratified by previous treatment status (with or without previous adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy) and geographic location (Europe, North America, South America and Asia). Pertuzumab was given intravenously at a starting dose of 840 mg followed by a dose of 420 mg every 3 weeks. Trastuzumab was given intravenously at a starting dose of 8 mg/kg followed by a dose of 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Patients were treated with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab until disease progression, withdrawal of consent to participation or the development of uncontrollable toxicity. Docetaxel was given as an intravenous infusion at a starting dose of 75 mg/m² every 3 weeks for at least 6 cycles. If the starting dose was well-tolerated, the dose of docetaxel could be increased up to 100 mg/m² at the investigator's discretion.

The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), assessed by an independent review facility (IRF) and defined as the interval between randomisation and disease progression or death (from any cause), where death occurred within 18 weeks of the last disease assessment. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), (investigator-rated) PFS, objective response rate (ORR), duration of response and time to progression (TTP).

Demographic characteristics were evenly balanced (mean age was 54 years, most \[59%\] were Caucasian and all but two were female). In each treatment group approximately half the patients had hormone (estrogen or progesterone) receptor-positive disease and had received previous adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy (184 patients \[45.8%\] in the pertuzumab group vs 192 patients \[47.3%\] in the placebo group). Most (37.3% and 40.4%, respectively) had previously received anthracyclines and approximately 10% had previously received trastuzumab (11.7% and 10.1%). A total 43% of patients from both groups had received prior radiotherapy. The mean baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 64.8% in the pertuzumab group and 65.6% in the placebo group (median 65.0%, range 50%-88% in the two groups).

The CLEOPATRA study showed statistically significant improvement of IRF-rated PFS in the pertuzumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio \[HR\]=0.62; 95% CI=0.51; 0.75, p\<0.0001) and an increase in median PFS of 6.1 months. Median PFS was 18.5 months in the pertuzumab group vs 12.4 months in the placebo group. Moreover, CLEOPATRA showed statistically significant improvement of overall survival in the pertuzumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio \[HR\]=0.68; 95% CI=0.56; 0.84, p\<0.0002) and an increase in median OS of 15.7 months. Median OS was 56.5 months in the pertuzumab group vs 40.8 months in the placebo group.

Despite the clear benefit of a combination therapy of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel when compared with a combination therapy of trastuzumab and docetaxel the study populations of the CLEOPATRA study might be slightly different from a patient population, in which pertuzumab, plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel or trastuzumab plus docetaxel are applied in routine clinical practice.

This non-interventional approach aims to confirm the clinically relevant outcomes shown in the phase III CLEOPATRA study in patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer in routine practice. Data on efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life will be documented for this purpose.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

trastuzumab plus chemotherapy

Treatment with trastuzumab plus chemotherapie as first line therapy, administered intravenously/subcutaneously in a three weekly frequency. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.

No interventions assigned to this group

pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy

Treatment with with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first line therapy, administered intravenously/subcutaneously in a three weekly frequency. Docetaxel is recommended as chemotherapy, however, any treatment choice or change in regimen is performed at the discretion of the treating physician.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult breast cancer patients (age ≥18 years)
* Patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable HER2-positive breast cancer proven by clinical measures (i.e. standard imaging) in first line treatment (Locally recurrent disease must not be amenable to resection with curative intent)
* Patients who are eligible for treatment with trastuzumab plus chemotherapy or pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus chemotherapy as first line therapy, administered intravenously in a three weekly frequency, according to each center's medical practice. The first line anti-HER2 treatment must not have started more than 28 days before study entry.
* No prior chemotherapy or HER2-directed therapy for metastatic or locally advanced disease, prior therapy for early breast cancer (eBC) is allowed
* Signed informed consent prior to onset of documentation.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients who are not eligible for observation due to severe comorbidities or unavailability according to the treating physician
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital Tuebingen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Diethelm Wallwiener, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen

Peter Fasching, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Frauenklinik des Universitätsklinikums Erlangen

Sara Brucker, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universitätsklinikum Tübingen Universitäts-Frauenklinik

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe Esslingen

Esslingen am Neckar, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

NCT Heidelberg

Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Frauenklinik des Städtischen Klinikums

Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

St. Vicentius Kliniken Karlsruhe gAG Frauenklininik

Karlsruhe, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Ortenau Klinikum Lahr-Ettenheim

Lahr, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Praxisklinik am Rosengarten

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Mannheim, Universitäts-Frauenklinik

Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsfrauenklinik Tübingen

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Onkokom GbR

Altötting, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

MVZ Amberg

Amberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Augsburg Frauenklinik

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Rottal-Inn-Kliniken GmbH

Eggenfelden, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsfrauenklinik Erlangen

Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Hämatologisch-Onkologische Praxis

Kronach, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Nürnberg AöR

Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Hochschulklinikum der Med. Hochschule Brandenburg

Neuruppin, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

g.SUND Gynäkologie Kompetenzzentrum

Stralsund, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Darmstadt, Frauenklinik

Darmstadt, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Zentrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie Bethanien

Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

MVZ Onkologische Kooperation Harz Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis

Goslar, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Frauenklinik Wetzlar

Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Agaplesion Diakonieklinikum Rotenburg/Wümme gGmbH

Rotenburg (Wümme), Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Gemeinschaftspraxis f. Hämatologie u. Onkologie

Westerstede, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Facharztzentrum am Schloß

Wolfenbüttel, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

MarienHospital Onkologische Praxis

Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Marienhospital Bottrop gGmbH

Bottrop, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Onkologie

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe des Universitätsklinikums Köln Brustzentrum

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Essen

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Schwerpunktpraxis für Hämatologie und Onkologie Hansen/Reeb/Pfitzner-Dempfle/Stehle

Kaiserslautern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH Frauenklinik

Chemnitz, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Dresden

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Universitäres Krebszentrum Leipzig

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Gemeinschaftspraxis

Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

MediOnko-Institut GbT

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Onkologisch-Hämatologische Schwerpunktpraxis

Bremen, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SEN2015-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.