Trial Outcomes & Findings for Targeting Cerebellum to Treat Psychosis: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Study (NCT NCT02642029)
NCT ID: NCT02642029
Last Updated: 2022-12-30
Results Overview
In each trial, participants are presented with two tones separated by 1200 ms (the standard interval), a 1s delay, then a comparison pair of tones. The time interval of the second tone pair will be either equal to (E-condition), longer than (L-condition), or shorter than (S-condition) that of the first pair. Participants are asked to indicate using a keyboard whether the second time interval is equal, longer, or shorter than the first. The tones for all conditions were 700Hz in frequency, 50ms in duration, and presented binaurally via headphones. Participants completed 15 trials during each pre- or post-TMS session for a total of up to 90 total trials across the three study visits. Prior to each IDT session, participants performed a practice run consisting of six trials. The primary outcome for this task was overall accuracy (proportion of correct responses).
COMPLETED
NA
28 participants
In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.
2022-12-30
Participant Flow
N=28 participants were enrolled (provided informed consent to participate in the study). (Note: when I enter the number in the "Protocol Enrollment" field, the number does not save.)
Two participants did not undergo TBS after enrollment. N=1 participant enrolled and completed the pre-intervention clinical evaluation but withdrew prior to randomization (no specific reason given by the participant). N=1 participant had a positive urine drug screen after enrollment; as active substance use within the prior 3 months is an exclusion criterion, the participant was excluded prior to randomization.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sham-iTBS-cTBS
Randomized first to Sham. Then randomized to iTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to cTBS for the third study visit.
|
Sham-cTBS-iTBS
Randomized first to Sham. Then randomized to cTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to iTBS for the third study visit.
|
iTBS-sham-cTBS
Randomized first to iTBS. Then randomized to sham for the second study visit. Then randomized to cTBS for the third study visit.
|
iTBS-cTBS-sham
Randomized first to iTBS. Then randomized to cTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to sham TBS for the third study visit.
|
cTBS-sham-iTBS
Randomized first to cTBS. Then randomized to sham for the second study visit. Then randomized to iTBS for the third study visit.
|
cTBS-iTBS-sham
Randomized first to cTBS. Then randomized to iTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to sham TBS for the third study visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Study Visit 1 (1 Day)
STARTED
|
6
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 1 (1 Day)
COMPLETED
|
6
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 1 (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
STARTED
|
6
|
5
|
3
|
4
|
4
|
4
|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
COMPLETED
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Study Visit 2 (1 Day)
STARTED
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 2 (1 Day)
COMPLETED
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 2 (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 2 (≥ 36 Hours)
STARTED
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Washout 2 (≥ 36 Hours)
COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Washout 2 (≥ 36 Hours)
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Study Visit 3 (1 Day)
STARTED
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 3 (1 Day)
COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
4
|
|
Study Visit 3 (1 Day)
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Sham-iTBS-cTBS
Randomized first to Sham. Then randomized to iTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to cTBS for the third study visit.
|
Sham-cTBS-iTBS
Randomized first to Sham. Then randomized to cTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to iTBS for the third study visit.
|
iTBS-sham-cTBS
Randomized first to iTBS. Then randomized to sham for the second study visit. Then randomized to cTBS for the third study visit.
|
iTBS-cTBS-sham
Randomized first to iTBS. Then randomized to cTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to sham TBS for the third study visit.
|
cTBS-sham-iTBS
Randomized first to cTBS. Then randomized to sham for the second study visit. Then randomized to iTBS for the third study visit.
|
cTBS-iTBS-sham
Randomized first to cTBS. Then randomized to iTBS for the second study visit. Then randomized to sham TBS for the third study visit.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 1 (≥ 36 Hours)
Protocol violation: Excluded due to change in psychiatric medications
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Study Visit 2 (1 Day)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 2 (≥ 36 Hours)
Adverse Event
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Washout 2 (≥ 36 Hours)
Excluded due to hospitalization for substance misuse
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Targeting Cerebellum to Treat Psychosis: a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participants
n=28 Participants
All enrolled participants (study was designed for all participants to receive all 3 interventions- iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS).
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis
Schizophrenia
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis
Schizoaffective disorder
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Diagnosis
Bipolar disorder with psychotic features
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
High School/GED
|
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
Part-college or 2-year college
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
College/bachelor's degree
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Education
Graduate/professional school
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Estimated Intelligence Quotient (IQ) [(North American Adult Reading Test (NAART)]
Verbal IQ
|
118.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Estimated Intelligence Quotient (IQ) [(North American Adult Reading Test (NAART)]
Performance IQ
|
114.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Estimated Intelligence Quotient (IQ) [(North American Adult Reading Test (NAART)]
Full scale IQ
|
118.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.1 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
PANSS, total
|
41.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
PANSS, positive
|
9.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
PANSS, negative
|
10.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
PANSS, general psychopathology
|
20.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
|
7.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)
|
10.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS-AH)
|
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Chlorpromazine equivalent dose (CPZ)
|
242.4 mg/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 311.6 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Taking antipsychotic medication
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Taking mood stabilizer
|
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Taking either antipsychotic or mood stabilizer
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Not taking any psychotropic medication
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
In each trial, participants are presented with two tones separated by 1200 ms (the standard interval), a 1s delay, then a comparison pair of tones. The time interval of the second tone pair will be either equal to (E-condition), longer than (L-condition), or shorter than (S-condition) that of the first pair. Participants are asked to indicate using a keyboard whether the second time interval is equal, longer, or shorter than the first. The tones for all conditions were 700Hz in frequency, 50ms in duration, and presented binaurally via headphones. Participants completed 15 trials during each pre- or post-TMS session for a total of up to 90 total trials across the three study visits. Prior to each IDT session, participants performed a practice run consisting of six trials. The primary outcome for this task was overall accuracy (proportion of correct responses).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of Time Interval Discrimination Pre- and Post-TMS
Pre-TBS
|
.503 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .156
|
.521 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .183
|
.456 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .141
|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of Time Interval Discrimination Pre- and Post-TMS
Post-TBS
|
.479 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .128
|
.514 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .145
|
.525 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .174
|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of Time Interval Discrimination Pre- and Post-TMS
Change in accuracy (post-pre)
|
-.024 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .175
|
-.006 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .163
|
.069 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Deviation .198
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants are presented with a series of words or numbers and prompted to indicate as quickly as possible whether the currently presented stimulus is the same as the one presented n-stimuli previously. For example, in a 2-back task a subject would be asked to indicate whether the current stimulus was identical to that presented 2 stimuli before. To increase the likelihood of detecting change in task performance with each TMS condition (and minimize potential ceiling or floor effects), the difficulty level was individualized so that each participant performed at approximately 80% accuracy; during the "pre" session of the first study visit, a trial session established the difficulty level, i.e., how many presentations back (n-stimuli) at which the task would start. After the trial session, a session with 50 presentations was carried out and recorded whether the response was correct (accuracy) and the time from presentation to response (reaction time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Pre-TBS
|
0.780 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0144
|
0.753 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0156
|
0.775 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0143
|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Post-TBS
|
0.795 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0138
|
0.778 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0147
|
0.784 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error 0.0139
|
|
Change (Δ) in Accuracy of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Ratio (post/pre)
|
1.10 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error .074
|
1.15 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error .077
|
1.05 accuracy (proportion correct)
Standard Error .065
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants are presented with a series of words or numbers and prompted to indicate as quickly as possible whether the currently presented stimulus is the same as the one presented n-stimuli previously. For example, in a 2-back task a subject would be asked to indicate whether the current stimulus was identical to that presented 2 stimuli before. To increase the likelihood of detecting change in task performance with each TMS condition (and minimize potential ceiling or floor effects), the difficulty level was individualized so that each participant performed at approximately 80% accuracy; during the "pre" session of the first study visit, a trial session established the difficulty level, i.e., how many presentations back (n-stimuli) at which the task would start. After the trial session, a session with 50 presentations was carried out and recorded whether the response was correct (accuracy) and the time from presentation to response (reaction time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Reaction Time (RT) of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Pre-TBS
|
831 ms
Standard Error 13.29
|
862 ms
Standard Error 14.62
|
901 ms
Standard Error 11.63
|
|
Change (Δ) in Reaction Time (RT) of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Post-TBS
|
817 ms
Standard Error 10.66
|
886 ms
Standard Error 10.80
|
877 ms
Standard Error 9.16
|
|
Change (Δ) in Reaction Time (RT) of N-back Working Memory Task Pre- and Post-TMS
Change in RT (post-pre)
|
-14 ms
Standard Error 8.90
|
24.0 ms
Standard Error 11.46
|
-23.8 ms
Standard Error 7.41
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Depressed Mood)
Pre-TBS
|
22.5 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 70.0
|
37 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 91.0
|
16 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 70.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Depressed Mood)
Post-TBS
|
19.5 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 72.0
|
42 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 71.0
|
4 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 76.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Depressed Mood)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -31.0 to 63.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -41.0 to 26.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -43.0 to 7.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Anxiety)
Pre-TBS
|
22 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 73.0
|
50 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 87.0
|
23 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 74.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Anxiety)
Post-TBS
|
4 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 75.0
|
30 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 77.0
|
5 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 73.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Anxiety)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Interval -50.0 to 24.0
|
-1 score on a scale
Interval -40.0 to 32.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -30.0 to 22.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent/no elation, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. Higher VAS scores for elation indicate more elation (suggestive of mania). The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Elated Mood)
Pre-TBS
|
6 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 54.0
|
2 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 51.0
|
1 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 53.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Elated Mood)
Post-TBS
|
8.5 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 60.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 57.0
|
1 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 40.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Elated Mood)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -54.0 to 49.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -24.0 to 51.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -50.0 to 37.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Auditory Hallucinations)
Pre-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 65.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 70.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Auditory Hallucinations)
Post-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 49.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 65.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Auditory Hallucinations)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -44.0 to 1.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 48.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -9.0 to 50.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Visual Hallucinations)
Pre-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 52.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 79.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Visual Hallucinations)
Post-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 53.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 56.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Visual Hallucinations)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -22.0 to 9.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -29.0 to 8.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -13.0 to 50.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Paranoid Ideation)
Pre-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 55.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 63.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 71.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Paranoid Ideation)
Post-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 59.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Paranoid Ideation)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -24.0 to 41.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -43.0 to 3.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -18.0 to 43.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Ideas/Delusions of Reference)
Pre-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 55.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 51.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 53.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Ideas/Delusions of Reference)
Post-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 54.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 53.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Ideas/Delusions of Reference)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -5.0 to 22.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -50.0 to 3.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 11.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: In each of the 3 study visits (separated by at least 36h), participants undergo (a) pre-TMS assessments (15-20min), (b) TMS (15min), and (c) post-TMS assessments (15-20min). Approximately 30-45 min separate the pre- and post-TMS task performances.Population: Cross-over design in which patients were assigned to 3 sessions of cerebellar TBS: one session each of iTBS, cTBS, and sham TBS. Analyses were conducted for all participants (patients who completed at least one study visit; n=26) as well as for completers only (patients who completed all 3 study visits; n=20; results not reported here). The fields for "overall number of participants analyzed" (above) indicate all participants who completed each of the sessions (iTBS, cTBS, sham TBS).
Participants will take a brief computerized survey pre- and post-TMS, in which they will be presented with visual analogue scales (VAS, range 0-100, 0=absent, 100=most severe) and asked to indicate current levels of depression, anxiety, euphoria, auditory hallucinations, visual hallucinations, paranoia, referential thinking, and delusions of control. The VAS format will allow participants to self-report ratings quickly and easily with simple mouse clicks.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 Participants
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 Participants
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 Participants
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Delusions of Control)
Pre-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 50.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 25.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 3.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Delusions of Control)
Post-TBS
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 29.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 73.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval 0.0 to 11.0
|
|
Change (Δ) in Symptoms (Delusions of Control)
Change in VAS score (post-pre)
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -48.0 to 28.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -24.0 to 48.0
|
0 score on a scale
Interval -2.0 to 11.0
|
Adverse Events
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
Sham TBS
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Intermittent TBS (iTBS)
n=22 participants at risk
Single session of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (600 pulses in blocks of 2s, separated by 8s of pause) to cerebellar vermis.
|
Continuous TBS (cTBS)
n=21 participants at risk
Single session of continuous theta-burst stimulation of 600 pulses to cerebellar vermis.
|
Sham TBS
n=25 participants at risk
Single session, using the exact same procedures as the active arms but with a sham coil, which is designed to induce the same nonspecific sensory effects of TMS (auditory and somatosensory activation) without inducing the neuromodulatory magnetic fields.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Discomfort from TMS
|
9.1%
2/22 • Number of events 2 • Varied. Approximately one-month time frame (mean 11.6 ± 6.6, range 4-28 days). Participants were monitored for adverse events from enrollment to end of study participation.
|
0.00%
0/21 • Varied. Approximately one-month time frame (mean 11.6 ± 6.6, range 4-28 days). Participants were monitored for adverse events from enrollment to end of study participation.
|
4.0%
1/25 • Number of events 1 • Varied. Approximately one-month time frame (mean 11.6 ± 6.6, range 4-28 days). Participants were monitored for adverse events from enrollment to end of study participation.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place