Vortioxetine for MDD, Cognition, and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers
NCT ID: NCT02637466
Last Updated: 2016-09-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
PHASE4
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-07-31
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Medical conditions such as major depression are associated with increased levels of systemic pro-inflammatory cytokines, thereby creating a host environment that promotes cancer progression. Indeed, innate immune activation and chronic inflammation have been implicated in the pathogenesis of major depression and may account for the biological mechanism linking depression and cancer progression. Several studies have shown antidepressant treatment response attenuates and normalizes pro-inflammatory cytokine plasma levels in medically-healthy patients with depression. To date, only three randomized controlled antidepressant studies have been conducted in depressed women with breast cancer. Two studies found mainserin to be effective and superior to placebo, whereas paroxetine and desipramine were comparable to placebo. Notably, several randomized controlled trials in depressed breast cancer patients found psychotherapy to be an effective depression treatment. Moreover, these studies found psychotherapy significantly lengthened survival time in depressed breast cancer patients with metastatic disease. Remarkably, no randomized controlled trials have examined the impact of antidepressant medications on cancer survival.
To date, there have been no randomized, placebo-controlled antidepressant studies in depressed women with breast cancer to investigate the impact of depression treatment on cognition and the inflammatory mediators that promote cancer progression. This study will explore the efficacy of vortioxetine on depression and cognition in women with breast cancer, and determine whether successful treatment of depression alters circulating cytokines, immune mediators, and circulating tumor cells, thus elucidating a possible mechanism to explain improved cancer outcome with effective antidepressant treatment. Given the disproportionately high rate of depression in women with breast cancer and its negative impact on cancer outcome, understanding the biological mechanism that drives this relationship is critical. This study may uncover novel immune-mediated mechanisms by which vortioxetine treatment ameliorates depression, enhances cognition, and influences cancer outcome.
Primary Objective - To assess antidepressant efficacy of vortioxetine (VTX) treatment in women with major depressive disorder (MDD) who have completed curative treatment of Stage I, II or III breast cancer.
Primary Endpoint Antidepressant efficacy will be assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HDRS-21) total score administered at specified time points. Antidepressant response is defined as a 50% reduction in baseline HDRS-21 total score, and treatment remission is defined as an HDRS-21 total score ≤7. Antidepressants will be deemed effective if the patient's depression does not worsen. A participant's depression will be classified as "worse" if a) the participant becomes suicidal or psychotic, b) their HAM-D score increases \> 18, or over a four-week period of time: c) the HAM-D score increases, and d) the CGI Improvement Rating has increased by at least one point. The definitions of antidepressant efficacy and worsening depression remain the same during Cycle 2.
\- Cognitive function will be assessed by Brief Assessment of Cognition in Affective Disorders (BAC-A) test battery with measures in: (1) list learning, (2) digit sequencing task, (3) token motor task, (4) verbal fluency, (5) tower of London test, (6) symbol coding, and (7) affective processing subtest. All BAC-A measures will be administered at specified time points, and the total composite z-scores will be compared to baseline total composite z-scores.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vortioxetine
In cycle I of the study, participants will be randomized on to flexible-dose VTX (10-20 mg) versus. Vortioxetine starting dose will be 10 mg daily. Vortioxetine starting dose will be 10 mg daily with a dose escalation up to 20 mg daily at week #4. Study cycle II is an 8-week, open label treatment design for non-responders completing the Cycle I RCT. One treatment arm will continue VTX non-responders to 8 week VTX (10-20 mg/day) augmentation with cognitive behavioral therapy (10 sessions). The 2nd treatment arm will continue placebo non-responders who complete the RCT to VTX (10 to 20 mg/day). The third treatment arm will continue VTX responders/remitters who complete the RCT to open-label VTX for another 8-weeks to assess maintenance efficacy for up to 16 weeks.
Vortioxetine
Placebo
In cycle I of the study, 80 eligible depressed women with breast cancer will be randomized into an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose vortioxetine (10-20 mg) treatment arm versus placebo arm.
Responders to placebo treatment will complete their study participation at the end of Cycle I, and will not proceed to Cycle II.
Vortioxetine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vortioxetine
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Confirmed diagnosis of Stage I, II, or III breast cancer
3. Completed curative cancer treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy) at least four weeks (≥ 4 weeks) prior to study entry no more than 5 years.
4. Unipolar major depression confirmed by the mood disorder module in Structured Clinical interview for DSM-V (SCID)
5. Baseline depression severity total score ≥18 by Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 (HDRS-21)
6. Negative urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP).
7. Use of medically-established contraceptive method (e.g., contraceptive hormone therapy or intrauterine device) in women of child-bearing potential (WOCBP) or abstinence from heterosexual intercourse from the time of signing informed consent through 14 days after the last dose of study drug.
8. Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent and HIPAA document/s
Exclusion Criteria
4\. Mini-mental state exam (MMSE) score \<24 at baseline assessment 5. Current use of stimulant and/or amphetamine for cancer-related fatigue or cognitive impairment.
6\. Use of current and effective antidepressants during study period. \[NOTE: Patients who have not responded to current antidepressant may be tapered off medication prior to study entry.\] 7. Uncontrolled hypothyroidism. Must be biochemically (TSH, T3, T4) and clinically euthyroid at baseline assessment.
8\. Use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) in past 14 days. 9. Concomitant use of mood stabilizer including lithium, lamictal and atypical antipsychotics 10. Failed prior therapy with vortioxetine (VTX) 11. Positive urine toxicology screen for cocaine, opiates, marijuana, amphetamines.
12\. Comorbid alcohol and/or substance use disorder within the prior 12 months of screening, as diagnosed by psychiatric clinical interview conducted by a certified mental health provider.
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Takeda
INDUSTRY
University of Miami
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dominique Musselman
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dominique Musselman, M.D., MSCR
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Miami
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20150753
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id