Seated Evaluation of Anorectal funcTion by High Resolution Anorectal Manometry

NCT ID: NCT02633592

Last Updated: 2015-12-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess whether HR-ARM (High resolution Anorectal Manometry) performed in the more naturalistic / physiological upright, seated position on a commode provides a more valid assessment of anorectal function and simulated defecation than the same test performed in the standard, left lateral position

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

High Resolution Anorectal Manometry (HR-ARM) with data presented as pressure topography is a recent addition to the tests available for diagnosis of defecatory disorders including fecal incontinence and constipation.HR-ARM represents an advance on conventional manometry because closely spaced sensors across the anal sphincter remove the need for a pull-through procedure and facilitate data acquisition and interpretation. In particular measurements are not confounded by changes in position of the catheter relative to anal sphincter that occur during voluntary contraction and, especially, simulated defecation.

Notwithstanding these technological improvements, important concerns remain about the validity of manometry measurements during simulated defecation. These concerns are based on the observation in both conventional and HR-ARM that a large proportion of healthy individuals appear to have abnormal anorectal function ("dyssynergia") during simulated defecation.This limitation led to the recommendation that the finding of dyssynergia on manometry should be confirmed by defecography. This is unsatisfactory as diagnostic tests should not have a high rate of "false positives" and also because this increases the time and costs needed to complete diagnostic investigation in patients with defecatory disorders.

The high rate of abnormal findings in healthy individuals may be because current manometry procedures and other anorectal tests (e.g. rectal balloon expulsion) are usually performed, not in the upright, seated position (USP) usually adopted for defecation, but in the un-physiological left lateral position (LLP). Several factors may contribute. First, defecation in the LLP is not aided by gravity as it is in the sitting position. Second, anorectal anatomy may be altered and less conducive to the passage of stool in the LLP. Third, simulating defecation in the LLP does not reflect normal behavior and, despite optimal interaction and explanation by the investigator, changes in patient behavior may result in apparent "dyssynergia" Finally, social stress, related to proximity of the investigator observing defecation, makes individuals feel unable to strain at stool or attempt defecation.

A simple probe holder device that, by adhering to the skin is positioned at the natal cleft to support the ManoScan HR ARM catheter can be used to assess anorectal pressures in the sitting position (both produced by Given Imaging, Yoqeam, Israel). This simple device stabilizes the catheter position when the patient is in USP on a commode and allows the investigator to withdraw behind the curtains of the examination cubicle.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anismus Incontinence

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

High Resolution Anorectal Manometry Magnetic Resonance Imaging Balloon Expulsion Position

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HRARM

Patients and healthy volunteers are subjected to position change ( LLP to SP) during pressure measurements with HR-ARM.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HRARM

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the seated and lying position during HRAM

MRI Defecography

Patients and healthy volunteers are subjected to position change during MRI Defecography

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

MRI Defecography

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the supine and left lateral position in the MRI

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HRARM

Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the seated and lying position during HRAM

Intervention Type OTHER

MRI Defecography

Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the supine and left lateral position in the MRI

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MRD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent
* Male or female, age 18 - 75 years
* Females eligible to participate either if physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant or with a negative urine pregnancy test at screening
* HS: Absence of symptoms of constipation or incontinence

Patients with fecal incontinence

* Passive or Urge Incontinence
* Wexner Score of 5-20 ("more than mild severity of incontinence")

Patients with obstructive defecation

• Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System: 10-30 ("more than mild severity of constipation)

Exclusion Criteria

* • Participation in any other clinical trial with investigational or approved drugs within the last month before the study

* Significant medical, surgical or psychiatric disease requiring on-going active management
* Previous gastrointestinal or gynaecological disease (exception: non symptomatic ovarian cysts, occasional reflux, appendectomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy)
* Regular use of opiates or other constipating agents
* Presence of fecal impaction on clinical per rectal exam
* Abnormal findings on proctoscopy / endoscopy (e.g. Inflammatory Bowel Disease, neoplasm, acute or chronic anal fissure, large haemorrhoids (grade 3-4) intussusception, prolapse or gross perineal descent (\>5cm) on straining
* Insufficient understanding of German language to comply with instructions
* Contraindication for MRI: Presence of non-MR-compatible metallic implants, devices or metallic foreign bodies
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Zurich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henriette Heinrich

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR 3rd. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):218-38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.028. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23261065 (View on PubMed)

Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J, Harvey DM, Zinsmeister AR. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):314-322.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23142135 (View on PubMed)

Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Harvey DM, Ravi K, Zinsmeister AR. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1530-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.221. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22986439 (View on PubMed)

Heinrich H, Fruehauf H, Sauter M, Steingotter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Fox M. The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Mar;25(3):230-7, e163. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12038. Epub 2012 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23130678 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KEK-ZH-Nr. 2014-0058

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id