Seated Evaluation of Anorectal funcTion by High Resolution Anorectal Manometry
NCT ID: NCT02633592
Last Updated: 2015-12-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-11-30
2015-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Notwithstanding these technological improvements, important concerns remain about the validity of manometry measurements during simulated defecation. These concerns are based on the observation in both conventional and HR-ARM that a large proportion of healthy individuals appear to have abnormal anorectal function ("dyssynergia") during simulated defecation.This limitation led to the recommendation that the finding of dyssynergia on manometry should be confirmed by defecography. This is unsatisfactory as diagnostic tests should not have a high rate of "false positives" and also because this increases the time and costs needed to complete diagnostic investigation in patients with defecatory disorders.
The high rate of abnormal findings in healthy individuals may be because current manometry procedures and other anorectal tests (e.g. rectal balloon expulsion) are usually performed, not in the upright, seated position (USP) usually adopted for defecation, but in the un-physiological left lateral position (LLP). Several factors may contribute. First, defecation in the LLP is not aided by gravity as it is in the sitting position. Second, anorectal anatomy may be altered and less conducive to the passage of stool in the LLP. Third, simulating defecation in the LLP does not reflect normal behavior and, despite optimal interaction and explanation by the investigator, changes in patient behavior may result in apparent "dyssynergia" Finally, social stress, related to proximity of the investigator observing defecation, makes individuals feel unable to strain at stool or attempt defecation.
A simple probe holder device that, by adhering to the skin is positioned at the natal cleft to support the ManoScan HR ARM catheter can be used to assess anorectal pressures in the sitting position (both produced by Given Imaging, Yoqeam, Israel). This simple device stabilizes the catheter position when the patient is in USP on a commode and allows the investigator to withdraw behind the curtains of the examination cubicle.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HRARM
Patients and healthy volunteers are subjected to position change ( LLP to SP) during pressure measurements with HR-ARM.
HRARM
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the seated and lying position during HRAM
MRI Defecography
Patients and healthy volunteers are subjected to position change during MRI Defecography
MRI Defecography
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the supine and left lateral position in the MRI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HRARM
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the seated and lying position during HRAM
MRI Defecography
Patients and healthy volunteers are investigated in the supine and left lateral position in the MRI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or female, age 18 - 75 years
* Females eligible to participate either if physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant or with a negative urine pregnancy test at screening
* HS: Absence of symptoms of constipation or incontinence
Patients with fecal incontinence
* Passive or Urge Incontinence
* Wexner Score of 5-20 ("more than mild severity of incontinence")
Patients with obstructive defecation
• Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System: 10-30 ("more than mild severity of constipation)
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant medical, surgical or psychiatric disease requiring on-going active management
* Previous gastrointestinal or gynaecological disease (exception: non symptomatic ovarian cysts, occasional reflux, appendectomy, hysterectomy, cholecystectomy)
* Regular use of opiates or other constipating agents
* Presence of fecal impaction on clinical per rectal exam
* Abnormal findings on proctoscopy / endoscopy (e.g. Inflammatory Bowel Disease, neoplasm, acute or chronic anal fissure, large haemorrhoids (grade 3-4) intussusception, prolapse or gross perineal descent (\>5cm) on straining
* Insufficient understanding of German language to comply with instructions
* Contraindication for MRI: Presence of non-MR-compatible metallic implants, devices or metallic foreign bodies
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Zurich
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Henriette Heinrich
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department for Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bharucha AE, Pemberton JH, Locke GR 3rd. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on constipation. Gastroenterology. 2013 Jan;144(1):218-38. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.028. No abstract available.
Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Noelting J, Harvey DM, Zinsmeister AR. Phenotypic identification and classification of functional defecatory disorders using high-resolution anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013 Feb;144(2):314-322.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.10.049. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
Noelting J, Ratuapli SK, Bharucha AE, Harvey DM, Ravi K, Zinsmeister AR. Normal values for high-resolution anorectal manometry in healthy women: effects of age and significance of rectoanal gradient. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Oct;107(10):1530-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.221. Epub 2012 Sep 18.
Heinrich H, Fruehauf H, Sauter M, Steingotter A, Fried M, Schwizer W, Fox M. The effect of standard compared to enhanced instruction and verbal feedback on anorectal manometry measurements. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013 Mar;25(3):230-7, e163. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12038. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KEK-ZH-Nr. 2014-0058
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id