Targeted Vessel Ablation of Type 3 Uterine Fibroids With Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
NCT ID: NCT02633254
Last Updated: 2017-04-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-12-31
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Factors Influencing Volumetric MR-HIFU Ablation of Uterine Fibroids
NCT02386137
Treatment of Uterine Fibroids With Magnetic Resonance Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
NCT02736435
Clinical Test of the MRgHIFU System on Uterine Fibroids
NCT02283502
The FIRSTT: Comparing MRgFUS(MR-guided Focused Ultrasound) Versus UAE (Uterine Artery Embolization)for Uterine Fibroids.
NCT00995878
Safety Trial of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery (FUS) in Women With Uterine Fibroids Wishing to Pursue Pregnancy in the Future
NCT00180739
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A limitation of MR-HIFU is that currently not all types of uterine fibroids are treatable. With respect to MR-HIFU treatment, uterine fibroids are classified in three classes based on the signal intensity of T2-weighted MR images. While MR-HIFU has been shown to result in a reliable positive therapeutic outcome in type 1 and type 2 fibroids, the therapeutic success in type 3 fibroids has so far been limited. The current clinical consensus is that the high perfusion in type 3 fibroids, which causes the heat deposited by the HIFU to be rapidly evacuated from the treatment site, results in insufficient temperatures to induce necrosis in the fibroids. Therefore, a new treatment strategy is proposed to effectively treat type 3 fibroids with MR-HIFU.
Objective: To investigate whether it is possible to manipulate perfusion in type 3 fibroids with MR-HIFU.
Study design: Single-center, single arm, non-randomized trial. Ten patients will be treated.
Study population: Adult women with a type 3 uterine fibroid who fulfill the in- and exclusion criteria.
Intervention: During the MR-HIFU treatment, the local vascular feeding network will be selectively targeted first with high power sonications with the intention to reduce or interrupt the perfusion of the entire fibroid volume. Subsequently, the remaining fibroid volume will be ablated, similar to the treatment approach of type 1/2 fibroids.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The fibroid type and the eligibility for MR-HIFU treatment will be determined on a clinically obtained MRI scan. The results of the scan and information about this study are provided to the patient during a phone call. If the patient is interested, the study information is sent by mail. The patient receives a second phone call to ask if she wishes to participate. If so, an appointment at the hospital is arranged to give details on the study, answer questions, and show the clinical MR scan. If the patient still wants to participate, informed consent (IC) is signed. The HIFU treatment will be scheduled in consultation with the patient.
Patients will be sedated during the HIFU intervention, as it is also the case during the standard HIFU treatment of type 1/2 fibroids. Compared to the standard HIFU treatment, the initial selective ablation of the vascular feeding network with high power sonications will be added. The subsequent therapy for the remainder of the fibroid will follow the standard therapeutic HIFU treatment of type 1/2 fibroids.
One week after the treatment the patient will receive a phone call to ask about adverse events. Three months after the treatment a follow-up MR scan, including a DCE scan, will be performed. In addition, the patient will be asked about any adverse events that might have occurred during a phone call.
Potential adverse effects include skin burns due to heating of the cutaneous and sub-cutaneous abdominal fat and risk of abdominal pain due to the occlusion of the vascular network. To mitigate the risk of skin burns, a cooling cushion is integrated in the HIFU table top and will protect the skin and part of the abdominal fat from overheating.
If women with a type 3 fibroid do not want to participate in this study, they are not eligible for MR-HIFU treatment and are referred by their gynecologist to a more invasive treatment option like uterine artery embolization or hysterectomy.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single arm
Treatment group Magentic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound will be employed on uterine fibroids
Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Targeted vessel ablation of type 3 uterine fibroids with magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic Resonance guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound
Targeted vessel ablation of type 3 uterine fibroids with magnetic resonance guided high intensity focused ultrasound
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A type 3 uterine fibroid;
* Sufficient physical condition to undergo deep sedation;
* Waist circumference that allows positioning on the HIFU table top inside the MR bore.
Exclusion Criteria
* Contra-indication to injection of gadolinium-based contrast agent, including known prior allergic reaction to any contrast agent, and renal failure (GFR \<30 mL/min/1.73 m2);
* Surgical clips or considerable scar tissue in the HIFU beam path;
* A total of more than ten fibroids;
* Post- or peri-menopausal status;
* Fibroid size \>10 cm in diameter;
* Patient has an active pelvic infection;
* Patient has an undiagnosed pelvic mass outside the uterus;
* Patient who is not able to tolerate the required stationary prone position during treatment.
18 Years
100 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
UMC Utrecht
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maurice A.A.J. van den Bosch
Prof. Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maurice van den Bosch, Prof Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-528
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.