Photochemotherapy and Graft-versus-leukemia in Acute-leukemia
NCT ID: NCT02631993
Last Updated: 2015-12-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
47 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-10-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The present study aim to investigate what happens to the GVL after photochemotherapy of aGVHD in a predominantly retrospective setting with 10-years follow-up after HSCT
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The risk for relapse after HSCT is graded into low-risk if the disease is in first complete remission before HSCT, all other disease states are classified as high-risk.
Eligible patients received photochemotherapy (Ultraviolet radiation type A on skin photosensitized by oral 8-methoxypsoralen) for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD within 100-days after HSCT). Photochemotherapy may be given as primary or later aGVHD therapy. Patients with aGVHD after booster doses of stem-cells or donor-lymphocyte-infusions are not included.
Additional treatment are registered where present. Methotrexate is not considered as an additional GVHD treatment as intravenous methotrexate a part of the governing GVHD prophylaxis and as the effects of methotrexate as a secondary aGVHD treatment is weak.
At the start, the end, at maximum and up until two weeks after end of PUVA-therapy the GVHD is diagnosed in accordance with Glucksberg and indexed by CIBMTR.
Relapse is diagnosed when leukemic cells is present extra medullary or with a bone marrow biopsy with ≥ 30% blasts. Early relapse is diagnosed when the medulla contain 5 - 30% blasts
The primary outcome is GVL i.e. abscence of relapse in malignant disease or minimal residual disease (MRD) i.e. threatening relapse in malignant disease demanding donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI).
Primary predictor: Time-to-treatment by photochemotherapy at day 0 - 7 vs. start at day 8 ≤ of aGVHD.
Continuous secondary predictor: Time-to-treatment by photochemotherapy as a continuous variable (days after start of aGVHD).
Binary secondary predictors: Risk (Low/High), Sibling donor-recipient (Yes/No), Mismatched related (Yes/No), Unrelated donor (Yes/No), (Male recipients of female grafts (Yes/No), T-cell depletion or Anti-Thymocyte Globulin (Yes/No).
Categorical secondary predictors: AGVHD organ disease stage and disease grade; Skin (+, ++, +++, ++++), Liver (+, ++, +++, ++++), Gastro-intestinal (+, ++, +++, ++++), Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research CIBMTR index (A, B, C, D) respectively.
Statistical analysis:
Cox proportional Hazards ratio is used to conduct a univariate data analysis of all adequate variables in patient characteristics and disease towards the primary outcome. In the analysis, death, DLI or retransplantation due to graft-failure was treated as a competing event. The primary predictor (binary) and all binary or categorical covariates identified from the patient and disease characteristics are to be included in a multivariate forward regression analysis, controlled for with backward regression based on the log-likelihood method. P=0.05 is considered as significant and p=0.10 as a trend. StatSoft, Inc. (2013). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 12. www.statsoft.com. are used for statistical computation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Photochemotherapy
Oral 8-Methoxypsoralene (8-MOP), (0.4-0.8 mg/kg), are given 1.5-2 hours before phototherapy. Ultraviolet light type A (UVA, 320-400 nm) is administered in a Waldmann UV1000 supine unit through 26 100-W fluorescent PUVA lamps (Waldmann F85), if needed, UVA is given in a half body unit with 15 100-W PUVA-lamps (Waldmann F85), (Waldmann UV3003K), (Waldmann, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany). Eye protection is applied during 24 h after oral 8-MOP and the genital area are shielded in males during therapy.The UVA is initiated at 0.2-1.5 J/cm2 and is amplified by 0.25-0.5 J/cm2 after two treatments if photo toxicity is absent. PUVA is given to the patients 3-5 times each week.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nicolas Feldreich
M.D.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nicolas Feldreich, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute
Olle Ringden, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Division of Therapeutic Immunology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institute
Brigitta Omazic, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Oncology and Pathology,
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Dermatology, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge
Stockholm, Stockholm County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Thomas E, Storb R, Clift RA, Fefer A, Johnson FL, Neiman PE, Lerner KG, Glucksberg H, Buckner CD. Bone-marrow transplantation (first of two parts). N Engl J Med. 1975 Apr 17;292(16):832-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197504172921605. No abstract available.
Ringden O, Witherspoon RP, Storb R, Ekelund E, Thomas ED. Increased in vitro B-cell IgG secretion during acute graft-versus-host disease and infection. Observations in 50 human marrow transplant recipients. Blood. 1980 Feb;55(2):179-86.
Ringden O, Sundberg B, Lonnqvist B, Tollemar J, Gahrton G, Nilsson B. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for leukemia: factors of importance for long-term survival and relapse. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1988 Jul;3(4):281-90.
Alyea EP, DeAngelo DJ, Moldrem J, Pagel JM, Przepiorka D, Sadelin M, Young JW, Giralt S, Bishop M, Riddell S. NCI First International Workshop on The Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: report from the committee on prevention of relapse following allogeneic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Aug;16(8):1037-69. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.005. Epub 2010 May 24.
Horowitz MM, Gale RP, Sondel PM, Goldman JM, Kersey J, Kolb HJ, Rimm AA, Ringden O, Rozman C, Speck B, et al. Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 1990 Feb 1;75(3):555-62.
Ringden O, Labopin M, Solders M, Beelen D, Arnold R, Ehninger G, Milpied N, Niederwieser D, Hamladji RM, Kyrcz-Krzemien S, Ganser A, Socie G, Stelljes M, Volin L, Craddock C, Mohty M; Acute Leukaemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Who is the best hematopoietic stem-cell donor for a male patient with acute leukemia? Transplantation. 2014 Sep 15;98(5):569-77. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000102.
Strauss GH, Bridges BA, Greaves M, Hall-Smith P, Price M, Vella-Briffa D. Inhibition of delayed hypersensitivity reaction in skin (DNCB test) by 8-methoxypsoralen photochemotherapy. Possible basis for pseudo-promoting action in skin carcinogenesis? Lancet. 1980 Sep 13;2(8194):556-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(80)91992-3.
Wolf P, Nghiem DX, Walterscheid JP, Byrne S, Matsumura Y, Matsumura Y, Bucana C, Ananthaswamy HN, Ullrich SE. Platelet-activating factor is crucial in psoralen and ultraviolet A-induced immune suppression, inflammation, and apoptosis. Am J Pathol. 2006 Sep;169(3):795-805. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060079.
Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA, Lerner KG, Thomas ED. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation. 1974 Oct;18(4):295-304. doi: 10.1097/00007890-197410000-00001. No abstract available.
Parrish JA, Fitzpatrick TB, Tanenbaum L, Pathak MA. Photochemotherapy of psoriasis with oral methoxsalen and longwave ultraviolet light. N Engl J Med. 1974 Dec 5;291(23):1207-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197412052912301. No abstract available.
Ringden O, Karlsson H, Olsson R, Omazic B, Uhlin M. The allogeneic graft-versus-cancer effect. Br J Haematol. 2009 Dec;147(5):614-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07886.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
Hari P, Logan B, Drobyski WR. Temporal discordance between graft-versus-leukemia and graft-versus-host responses: a strategy for the separation of graft-versus-leukemia/graft-versus-host reactivity? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2004 Nov;10(11):743-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2004.07.006.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TIM Photochem 2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id