A Study of Luspatercept (ACE-536) to Treat Anemia Due to Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes

NCT ID: NCT02631070

Last Updated: 2021-12-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

229 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-09

Study Completion Date

2020-11-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study will be conducted in compliance with the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use/Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.

This is a Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to determine the efficacy and safety of luspatercept (ACE-536) versus placebo in participants with anemia due to the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate MDS with ring sideroblasts who require red blood cell (RBC) transfusions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anemia is considered to be one of the most prevalent cytopenias in patients who have myelodysplastic syndromes, an umbrella term used to describe disorders relating to the ineffective production of red blood cells, white blood cells, and/or platelets. Ranging in severity from mild (asymptomatic) to severe, anemia can result in patients requiring regular red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, which can lead to further complications from iron overload. The goal of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of luspatercept versus placebo in anemic patients who are categorized as International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) very low, low, or intermediate risk Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), have ring sideroblasts present, and require constant RBC transfusions. The design of the study will allow a period of initial randomization of patients into either the luspatercept or placebo arm, followed by a double-blind treatment period, and then an MDS disease assessment visit. For those patients that are determined to be experiencing clinical benefit as judged from the study Investigator by this disease assessment visit, they will be permitted to enter the double-blind Extension Phase of the study. Once patients are discontinued from study treatment, they will enter a post treatment follow-up period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Luspatercept Transfusion dependent Lower risk Low risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes ESA refractory ESA intolerant ESA ineligible ACE-536 Anemia Ring Sideroblasts Require Red Blood Cell Transfusions MEDALIST MDS IPSS-R very low/IPSS-R low/IPSS-R intermediate

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental Arm - Luspatercept (ACE-536)

Starting dose of 1.0 mg/kg subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Luspatercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Control Arm: Placebo

Subcutaneous injection every 3 weeks

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Luspatercept

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACE-536

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects must satisfy the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

1. Subject is ≥ 18 years of age the time of signing the informed consent form (ICF).
2. Documented diagnosis of MDS according to World Health Organization (WHO)/French American British (FAB) classification that meets IPSS R classification of very low, low, or intermediate risk disease, and:

Ring sideroblast ≥ 15% of erythroid precursors in bone marrow or ≥ 5% (but \< 15%) if SF3B1 mutation is present.

* \< 5% blasts in bone marrow
* Peripheral blood white blood cell (WBC) count \< 13,000/µL 3. Requires red blood cell RBC transfusions 4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1, or 2 5. Subjects who are refractory/intolerant/ineligible to prior erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) treatment, defined as:
* Refractory to prior - erythropoietin stimulating agents treatment: documentation of non-response or response that is no longer maintained to prior ESA-containing regimen, either as single agent or combination (eg, with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF); ESA regimen must have been either recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu EPO) ≥ 40,000 IU/wk for at least 8 doses or equivalent OR darbepoetin alpha ≥ 500 μg Q3W for at least 4 doses or equivalent
* Intolerant to prior ESA treatment: documentation of discontinuation of prior ESA-containing regimen, either as single agent or combination (eg, with G-CSF), at any time after introduction due to intolerance or an adverse event
* ESA ineligible: low chance of response to ESA base on endogenous serum erythropoietin level \> 200 U/L for subjects not previously treated with ESAs

Exclusion Criteria

The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from enrollment:

1. Prior therapy with disease modifying agents for underlying MDS disease.
2. Previously treated with either luspatercept (ACE-536) or sotatercept (ACE-011)
3. MDS associated with del 5q cytogenetic abnormality
4. Secondary MDS, ie, MDS that is known to have arisen as the result of chemical injury or treatment with chemotherapy and/or radiation for other diseases.
5. Known clinically significant anemia due to iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies, or autoimmune or hereditary hemolytic anemia, or gastrointestinal bleeding

\- iron deficiency to be determined by serum ferritin less than or equal to 15 ug/L and additional testing if clinically indicated (eg, calculated transferrin saturation \[iron/total iron binding capacity less than or equal to 20%\] or bone marrow aspirate stain for iron).
6. Prior allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplant
7. Known history of diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
8. Use of any of the following within 5 weeks prior to randomization:

* anticancer cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agent or treatment
* corticosteroid, except for subjects on a stable or decreasing dose for ≥ 1 week prior to randomization for medical conditions other than MDS
* iron-chelating agents, except for subjects on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 8 weeks prior to randomization
* other RBC hematopoietic growth factors (eg, Interleukin-3)
* investigational drug or device, or approved therapy for investigational use. If the half-life of the previous investigational product is known, use within 5 times the half-life prior to randomization or within 5 weeks, whichever is longer is excluded.
9. Prior history of malignancies, other than MDS, unless the subject has been free of the disease (including completion of any active or adjuvant treatment for prior malignancy) for ≥ 5 years. However, subjects with the following history/concurrent conditions are allowed:

* Basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
* Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
* Carcinoma in situ of the breast
* Incidental histologic finding of prostate cancer (T1a or T1b using the tumor, nodes, metastasis \[TNM\] clinical staging system)
10. Major surgery within 8 weeks prior to randomization. Subjects must have completely recovered from any previous surgery prior to randomization
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Celgene

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rodrigo Ito, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Celgene

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stanford Cancer Center

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University School of Medicine

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Medical Institutions

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Karmanos Cancer Institute

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Montefiore Medical Center Albert Einstein Cancer Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Gabrail Cancer Center

Canton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

MD Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Algemeen Ziekenhuis Klina

Brasschaat, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Jan AV Brugge

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

UZ Brussels

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Grand Hopital de Charleroi

Charleroi, , Belgium

Site Status

UZ Gent

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

UZ Leuven

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Cliniques Universitaires UCL de Mont-Godine

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Tom Baker Cancer Center

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Juravinski Cancer Centre

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Princess Margaret Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

CHU d'Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU Hotel

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Lille-Hopital Claude Huriez Service des Maladies du Sang

Lille, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nice Archet I

Nice, , France

Site Status

Hopital Saint Louis

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Haut Leveque

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud Hematologie

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Hopital civil

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Hopital Bretonneau

Tours, , France

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Bonn

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden

Dresden, , Germany

Site Status

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Marien Hospital

Düsseldorf, , Germany

Site Status

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München

München, , Germany

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Santi Antonio Biagio E Cesare Arrigo

Allessandria, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna Policlinico Sorsola Malpighi

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi

Florence, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce

Lecce, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo

Pavia, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi Melacrino Morelli

Reggio Calabria, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Fondazione PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

VU Medisch Centrum

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Spaarne Ziekenhuis

Hoofddorp, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Cruces

Barakaldo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Vall D hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Instituto Catalan de Oncologia-Hospital Duran i Reynals

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Hospital Universitario La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Sahlgrenska Universitetssjukhus

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Skanes Universitetssjukhus Lund

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Akademiska Sjukhuset

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Cukurova University Medical Faculty Balcali Hospital

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara University Medical Faculty Cebeci Hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Hastanesi

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

John Radcliffe Hospital

Headington, , United Kingdom

Site Status

St James University Hospital

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Guys Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kings College Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Kings Mill Hospital

Sutton in Ashfield, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Russia United States Belgium Canada France Germany Italy Netherlands Spain Sweden Turkey (Türkiye) United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Porter J. Beyond transfusion therapy: new therapies in thalassemia including drugs, alternate donor transplant, and gene therapy. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):361-370. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.361.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30504333 (View on PubMed)

Piga A, Perrotta S, Gamberini MR, Voskaridou E, Melpignano A, Filosa A, Caruso V, Pietrangelo A, Longo F, Tartaglione I, Borgna-Pignatti C, Zhang X, Laadem A, Sherman ML, Attie KM. Luspatercept improves hemoglobin levels and blood transfusion requirements in a study of patients with beta-thalassemia. Blood. 2019 Mar 21;133(12):1279-1289. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879247. Epub 2019 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30617198 (View on PubMed)

Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Mufti GJ, Garcia-Manero G, Buckstein R, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Finelli C, Cazzola M, Ilhan O, Sekeres MA, Falantes JF, Arrizabalaga B, Salvi F, Giai V, Vyas P, Bowen D, Selleslag D, DeZern AE, Jurcic JG, Germing U, Gotze KS, Quesnel B, Beyne-Rauzy O, Cluzeau T, Voso MT, Mazure D, Vellenga E, Greenberg PL, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Zeidan AM, Ades L, Verma A, Savona MR, Laadem A, Benzohra A, Zhang J, Rampersad A, Dunshee DR, Linde PG, Sherman ML, Komrokji RS, List AF. Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jan 9;382(2):140-151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1908892.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31914241 (View on PubMed)

Komrokji RS. Luspatercept in Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Who and When? Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2020 Apr;34(2):393-400. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.10.004. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32089218 (View on PubMed)

Fenaux P, Kiladjian JJ, Platzbecker U. Luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes and primary myelofibrosis. Blood. 2019 Feb 21;133(8):790-794. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-11-876888. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30602619 (View on PubMed)

Germing U, Fenaux P, Platzbecker U, Buckstein R, Santini V, Diez-Campelo M, Yucel A, Tang D, Fabre S, Zhang G, Zoffoli R, Ha X, Miteva D, Hughes C, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM, Garcia-Manero G. Improved benefit of continuing luspatercept therapy: sub-analysis of patients with lower-risk MDS in the MEDALIST study. Ann Hematol. 2023 Feb;102(2):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-05071-8. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36635381 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-003454-41

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ACE-536-MDS-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id