Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pelvis RCT: Impact of Surgery on Pain in Lateral Compression Type Pelvic Fractures (NCT NCT02625766)

NCT ID: NCT02625766

Last Updated: 2022-05-09

Results Overview

The primary outcome was patient-reported pain severity, as measured by the mean of the 4 pain severity items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): worst pain in the last 24 hours, least pain in the last 24 hours, pain on average, and pain right now. The BPI uses a 0-10 level visual analog scale (VAS) with a 24-hour recall period, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 anchors "pain as bad as you can imagine." The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is not definitively established for the BPI in a trauma population; however, the MCID for other 10-point VAS pain scales has been reported between 1.0-2.5 points.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

95 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

up to 12 weeks post injury

Results posted on

2022-05-09

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Operative
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Overall Study
STARTED
47
48
Overall Study
COMPLETED
47
48
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Pelvis RCT: Impact of Surgery on Pain in Lateral Compression Type Pelvic Fractures

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Operative
n=47 Participants
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 Participants
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Total
n=95 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
43.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.9 • n=5 Participants
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.9 • n=7 Participants
43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.3 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=7 Participants
60 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
35 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
48 Participants
n=7 Participants
94 Participants
n=5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
6 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
77 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
BMI
Underweight (< 18.5 kg/m^2)
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
BMI
Normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m^2)
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
29 Participants
n=7 Participants
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
BMI
Overweight (25-29.9 kg/m^2)
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
BMI
Obese (>30 kg/m^2)
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
8 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
History of Comorbidities
Comorbidities
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
History of Comorbidities
No Comorbidities
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Mechanism of Injury
Motor Vehicle
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
38 Participants
n=7 Participants
74 Participants
n=5 Participants
Mechanism of Injury
Fall
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
Mechanism of Injury
Other
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Injury Severity Score (ISS)
17 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
18 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10 • n=7 Participants
17 scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 • n=5 Participants
Fracture Type
Lateral Compression Type 1
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
36 Participants
n=7 Participants
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
Fracture Type
Lateral Compression Type 2
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Initial Fracture Displacement
<5 mm (no/minimal displacement)
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
33 Participants
n=7 Participants
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
Initial Fracture Displacement
5-10 mm (displaced)
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 12 weeks post injury

The primary outcome was patient-reported pain severity, as measured by the mean of the 4 pain severity items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI): worst pain in the last 24 hours, least pain in the last 24 hours, pain on average, and pain right now. The BPI uses a 0-10 level visual analog scale (VAS) with a 24-hour recall period, where 0 anchors "no pain" and 10 anchors "pain as bad as you can imagine." The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is not definitively established for the BPI in a trauma population; however, the MCID for other 10-point VAS pain scales has been reported between 1.0-2.5 points.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Operative
n=47 Participants
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 Participants
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Posttreatment Pain
96 hr
5.3 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
6.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
Posttreatment Pain
2 wk
4.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
5.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
Posttreatment Pain
6 wk
2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
3.5 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
Posttreatment Pain
12 wk
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.0
2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: up to 12 weeks post injury

Secondary functional outcome was measured by the Majeed pelvic score. The Majeed pelvic score is a seven-item patient-reported outcome instrument that measures pain, work status, sitting comfort, sexual intercourse, use of walking aids, gait disturbance, and walking distance. The score is reported as a percentage of the highest possible score to adjust for participants who were not employed before their injury. Higher scores represent better function, and a score of \>85% has been suggested to represent excellent function.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Operative
n=47 Participants
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 Participants
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Posttreatment Function
2 wk
38 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11
31 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10
Posttreatment Function
6 wk
55 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18
50 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18
Posttreatment Function
12 wk
73 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20
62 percentage of score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through patient discharge, up to 12 weeks post injury

Length of hospitalization is determined by recording the admission date versus discharge date for the patient's index hospitalization stay.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Operative
n=47 Participants
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 Participants
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Length of Hospitalization
6.9 days
Interval 3.6 to 12.2
6.6 days
Interval 3.4 to 12.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through patient discharge, up to 12 weeks post injury

Time to first mobilization (bed to chair) is determined using the physical therapy notes during the patient's index hospitalization and is recorded as the number of days post injury that mobilization first occurred.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Operative
n=47 Participants
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 Participants
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Time to First Mobilization Post Injury
3 days
Interval 2.0 to 5.0
3 days
Interval 2.0 to 4.3

Adverse Events

Operative

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Non-operative

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 4 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Operative
n=47 participants at risk
Patients enrolled in the operative treatment group will undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. The surgeon will decide the best surgical technique as per standard of care for the patient's injury. The patient will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions and x-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly. If additional surgery is required or other complications arise, this will be recorded within the study follow-up forms. LC fracture surgical fixation
Non-operative
n=48 participants at risk
Patients enrolled in the non-operative treatment group will not undergo surgical intervention for their pelvic fracture. They will mobilize as per the surgeon's instructions according to standard of care of for this injury. X-rays will be taken at follow-up clinic appointments to determine if the injury is healing properly or if the pelvis has shifted and may warrant surgical intervention. If complications arise and/or surgery is required, crossover will be allowed and recorded within study follow-up forms. LC fracture non-operative management
Surgical and medical procedures
hardware loosening
4.3%
2/47 • Number of events 2 • 1 year
0.00%
0/48 • 1 year
Surgical and medical procedures
Wound seroma requiring drainage
2.1%
1/47 • Number of events 1 • 1 year
0.00%
0/48 • 1 year
Surgical and medical procedures
Unplanned fixation
0.00%
0/47 • 1 year
8.3%
4/48 • Number of events 4 • 1 year

Additional Information

Research Administrator

University of Maryland Medical Center

Phone: 4103289579

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place