Comparing Minimal Invasive Surgery en Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT02625311

Last Updated: 2015-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-12-31

Study Completion Date

2015-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Randomized clinical trial comparing minimal invasive operating technique to conventional operating technique for placement of total knee prosthesis.

Clinical evaluations, patient questionnaires, X-rays and CT scans were done to compare these two techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study executed with 3 centers and 69 patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MIS

Minimal invasive surgery for placement total knee prosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

surgery method using CR TKP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Operation through minimal invasive surgery or standard open surgery

conventional approach

conventional "open" surgery for placement total knee prosthesis.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

surgery method using CR TKP

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Operation through minimal invasive surgery or standard open surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

surgery method using CR TKP

Operation through minimal invasive surgery or standard open surgery

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Cruciate retaining (CR total knee prosthesis (TKP) Stryker

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patient requiring Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA)
* patients with Osteo arthritis
* intact collateral ligaments and patella tendon
* patients willing and able to comply with the post-operative schedule

Exclusion Criteria

* patients who require a revision TKA
* patients with TKA contralateral knee within 6 months with bad outcomes
* patients who need a TKA on contralateral side within 2 years
* intraoperative resurfacing of patella
* intraoperative eversion of patella
* patients who had prior procedure of involved knee such as high tibial osteotomy, cruciate ligament recontruction, knee fusion or patellectomy
* BMI \> 30
* patients with fixed flexion contracture\> 15 degrees
* patients with deformity greater than 20 degrees of varus or 15 degrees of valgus
* Patient with Mediolateral stability \> 10 degrees patient with active or suspected malignancy
* patient with Rheumatoid arthritis
* patient with systemic disease that would effect subject's wellfare or overall outcome of the study
* patient with other severe concurrent joint involvement which can effect their outcome
* patients with an immobile hip
* patient with a history of Pulmonary embolism or Deep venous thrombosis
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Feczko P, Engelmann L, Arts JJ, Campbell D. Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty using mini midvastus or medial parapatellar approach technique: A prospective, randomized, international multicentre trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 13;17:19. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-0872-7.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26762175 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MEC04-105

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id