Goal Achievement and Patient Satisfaction in Benign Hysterectomy
NCT ID: NCT02621710
Last Updated: 2017-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
57 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-12-31
2017-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Minimally invasive hysterectomy
Patients undergoing scheduled minimally invasive hysterectomy (vaginal, laparoscopic, robotic) for benign condition
Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
Abdominal hysterectomy
Patients undergoing scheduled abdominal hysterectomy for benign condition
Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaire 3 months post-operatively
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 or greater
* English speaking
* Access to communication via telephone
Exclusion Criteria
* Non-english speaking patient
* Patient without telephone access
* Patient undergoing emergent or unplanned hysterectomy
* Vulnerable populations
18 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Graham Chapman
Resident
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sangeeta Mahajan, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Pilzek AL, Raker CA, Sung VW. Are patients' personal goals achieved after pelvic reconstructive surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):347-50. doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2222-8. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):488.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011. Epub 2013 Jun 13.
Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient-centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success, and is it achieved? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):88-92. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124838.
Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Dec;189(6):1551-7; discussion 1557-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(03)00932-3.
Mahajan ST, Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-centered surgical outcomes: the impact of goal achievement and urge incontinence on patient satisfaction one year after surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):722-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.043.
Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, van Voorst S, Mol BW, Kluivers KB. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 444: choosing the route of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1156-1158. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c33c72.
Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, Shubella J, Gosciniak G, Wejkszner T, Kainz GF, Patriarco J, Thomas MB, Boulay R. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 May-Jun;21(3):389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.10.008. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
Warren L, Ladapo JA, Borah BJ, Gunnarsson CL. Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):519-24. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882736736.
Pitter MC, Simmonds C, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hubert HB. The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes. Interact J Med Res. 2014 Jul 17;3(3):e11. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.3160.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
053161
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id