Trial Outcomes & Findings for Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dementia (NCT NCT02621424)

NCT ID: NCT02621424

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Results Overview

Changes of California verbal learning test scores (CVLT) from baseline after treatment and 4 months later. CVLT is 16 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=16, higher the better memory).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

32 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Results posted on

2025-09-30

Participant Flow

Two hundred and twenty nine patients were screened. 43 patients signed consent. 32 were enrolled.

Thirty two patients were enrolled.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
RTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Overall Study
STARTED
14
18
Overall Study
COMPLETED
13
16
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
1
2

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
RTMS
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2

Baseline Characteristics

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Dementia

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
RTMS
n=14 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=18 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Total
n=32 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Continuous
71.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 • n=5 Participants
70.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7 • n=7 Participants
70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
31 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
neuropsychological testing
14 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

Changes of California verbal learning test scores (CVLT) from baseline after treatment and 4 months later. CVLT is 16 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=16, higher the better memory).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later
Baseline
8.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.6
9.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later
End of treatment
8.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.3
8.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.7
Changes From Baseline CVLT Scores After Treatment and 4 Month Later
4 month follow up
10.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.1
9.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

Changes in Boston Naming Test (BNT) from baseline was analyzed. BNT is a 60 points scoring system. (minimum=0, maximum=60, higher the better).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Changes in Boston Naming After Treatment
baseline
52.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
53.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3
Changes in Boston Naming After Treatment
End of treatment
52.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.2
56.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.6
Changes in Boston Naming After Treatment
4 month followup
54.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.1
55.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within a week following the last treatment session and 4 months later

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 13 had baseline BDNF collected, two withdrew. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 11 sets of data were available at end of treatment. Active arm: 14 started, two did not have BDNF collected. 12 sets of data were available at baseline and at end of treatment.

Changes in BDNF plasma levels (pg/ml) from baseline were analyzed after treatment. BDNF is a plasma biomarker, minimum=0, no maximum. Higher number means more BDNF synthesis).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=12 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Changes in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatment
baseline
5089 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 3508
5054 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 3440
Changes in Plasma BDNF Levels After Treatment
post treatment
5229 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 3713
5350 pg/ml
Standard Deviation 4981

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not test properly at end of treatment, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 12 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

Animal Fluency (AF) is a scoring system to assess the ability to generate a list of related words. The score is the number of animals the examinee can name in one minute time. (Minimum = 0, No maximum, higher the better).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later
baseline
17.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.6
15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.4
Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later
end of treatment
15.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
16.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Changes in Animal Fluency After Treatment and 4 Months Later
4 month followup
15.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.4
16.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

Trail making B is a scoring system for the assessment of the mental flexibility, processing speed and executive function. The score is the time (in seconds) it takes for the examinee to draw line segments connecting sequentially from 1-A-2-B-3....all the way to12-L-13. (The lower score means faster speed and means better performance. The minimum is (hypothetically) zero. There is no maximum. However, in some test centers, the maximum allowed time is 200 seconds.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later
4 month followup
185.8 Seconds
Standard Deviation 237.8
197.6 Seconds
Standard Deviation 204.9
Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later
baseline
187.5 Seconds
Standard Deviation 222.2
172.8 Seconds
Standard Deviation 94.8
Changes in Trail Making B Test Score After Treatment and 4 Months Later
end of treatment
179.8 Seconds
Standard Deviation 207.7
150.4 Seconds
Standard Deviation 64.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: assessed at baseline, end of treatment and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

A piece of paper with 6 simple drawings is presented to the subject for 10 seconds. The subject is then asked to draw these drawings from memory. The process is repeated three times to assess visual memory and learning. Each correct drawing scores two pints. Maximum score for three trials is 36. Minimum score is 0. Higher the better.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)
Baseline
18.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
17.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)
End of treatment
19.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7
17.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.3
Brief Visual Memory Test (BVMT)
4 month follow up
18.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5
16.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, end of treatment, and 4-month post-treatment follow up

Population: Sham arm: 18 started, 2 withdrew, 3 did not test properly at baseline, 1 did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 13 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up. Active arm: 14 started, one withdrew, two did not test properly at end of treatment, one did not show for follow up. 13 sets of data were available at baseline, 11 sets were available at end of treatment, 12 sets were available at follow up.

MoCA is a one page, 30 point cognitive screening test. It test the following cognitive domains: 1. short-term memory (5 points)- two learning trials of five nouns and delayed recall after approximately five minutes. 2. visuospatial abilities - clock-drawing task (3 points) and copy a cube (1 point). 3. executive functions - alternation task abbreviated trail-making B (1 point), and a two-item verbal abstraction task (2 points). 4. attention, concentration, and working memory - a sustained attention task (target detection using tapping; 1 point), a serial subtraction task (3 points), and digits forward and backward (1 point each). 5. language - three-item confrontation naming (3 points), repetition of two sentences (2 points), and verbal fluency (1 point). 6. abstract reasoning - describe the similarity of tasks (2 points). 7. orientation to time and place (6 points). Minimum score: 0. Maximum score: 30. Higher the better.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
RTMS
n=13 Participants
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation RTMS: stimulation of the brain with magnetic pulses
Sham
n=13 Participants
sham noise to block the sound of treatment sham: sham noise to block the sound of stimulation
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
baseline
22.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1
24.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
end of treatment
22.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
24.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.9
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
4 month follow up
24.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2
24.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.4

Adverse Events

RTMS

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Sham

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
RTMS
n=14 participants at risk
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation mild headache and irritation at the site of stimulation were reported and thought to be treatment-related. These event were mild and only lasted a day or two. There were other reported events and were reviewed with the IRB. They were determined to be not related to RTMS treatment.
Sham
n=18 participants at risk
sham noise to block the sound of treatment Low amplitude electrical stimulation was used to simulate the sensation of RTMS. The electrical stimulation to the scalp can cause mild sense of irritation, which only occurs when the stimulation is turned on. There were other reported events and were reviewed with the IRB. They were determined to be not related to RTMS treatment.
Nervous system disorders
epilepsy
7.1%
1/14 • Number of events 1 • 1 year post treartment
11.1%
2/18 • Number of events 2 • 1 year post treartment

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Jauhtai Cheng, MD, Staff Neurologist

VA Palo Alto

Phone: 650-493-5000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place