The Impact of Ear Pain Anticipatory Guidance Counseling on Otitis Related Visits in a Low Income Population
NCT ID: NCT02616458
Last Updated: 2015-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
310 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-11-30
2015-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Design: Single blind randomized control trial of an ear pain counseling program.
Setting: The Child Health Clinic (CHC), a primary care clinic at Children's Hospital Colorado, which serves a predominantly low income population with diverse cultural and ethnic backgrounds.
Participants: 310 mothers were enrolled at their child's 12-15 month well child visit.
Intervention: Structured 10-minute education intervention, given by a research assistant, used a slide presentation that reviewed ear pain Main Outcome and Measures: Number of ED, UC, and clinic visits for otitis media for the 12 month period after entry into the study and whether the visit included a prescription for antibiotics.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Ear Pain counseling materials reviewed concepts such as how to recognize ear pain and safely provide pain relief, and how to recognize danger signs that require urgent medical attention. Families were also encouraged to schedule an appointment in the CHC for a possible ear infection rather than going to the emergency department or urgent care facility after hours. The research assistant provided and reviewed proper dosing instructions for acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and provided a prescription for antipyrine/benzocaine analgesic ear drops to each family to use as pain relief if their child did develop ear pain in the subsequent 12 months.
All participating families completed a demographics survey that included information on race/ethnicity, insurance status, language(s) spoken in the home, and family composition In addition, participants completed the StimQ, the Parent Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS), and the he MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory.
At the child's 24 month preventive care visit, or approximately 12 months after the initial encounter, a research assistant blinded to the participant's study arm assignment met with each family and asked them to once again complete each of the above listed surveys and questionnaires. Those participants who did not present to the CHC for a clinic visit between 24 and 27 months of age, most commonly because they had switched providers or were delayed in scheduling the child's 24 month visit, were contacted by phone and asked to complete the surveys and questionnaires via US mail. If no follow up data had been collected by the time the child reached 30 months of age, that subject was considered lost to follow up.
The electronic medical record (EMR) for each child (EPIC) was reviewed for a diagnosis of otitis media using all otitis related diagnostic codes for 12 months following their initial index visit. The site of each subsequent otitis related visit was documented (CHC, Emergency Department, Urgent care clinic, Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) clinic) as well as antibiotic that was prescribed. The EMR review documented the number of otitis related visits for each child in total and by site of care as well as the time from the initial index visit to the first otitis related visit with and without an associated antibiotic prescription.
Appropriate statistical tests analyzed differences between study groups and baseline demographic characteristics. Interactions between the study group and dichotomous demographic variables were tested in negative-binomial regression models. When socio-demographic data was missing the enrollee was not included in that sub-analysis. Final stratified regression models represent the relationship between ear pain visits, the study group, and the dichotomous demographic characteristic. Each stratified model was analyzed to represent the appropriate intervention vs. control comparison for each level of the demographic factor \[e.g., Post High School education (intervention vs. control) and ≤ High School education (intervention vs. control)\].
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ear pain counseling
The Ear Pain counseling materials reviewed concepts such as how to recognize ear pain and safely provide pain relief, and how to recognize danger signs that require urgent medical attention. Families were also encouraged to schedule an appointment in the CHC for a possible ear infection rather than going to the emergency department or urgent care facility after hours. The research assistant provided and reviewed proper dosing instructions for acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and provided a prescription for antipyrine/benzocaine analgesic ear drops to each family to use as pain relief if their child did develop ear pain in the subsequent 12 months.
ear pain counseling
The Ear Pain counseling materials reviewed concepts such as how to recognize ear pain and safely provide pain relief, and how to recognize danger signs that require urgent medical attention. Families were also encouraged to schedule an appointment in the CHC for a possible ear infection rather than going to the emergency department or urgent care facility after hours.
language power counseling
The Language Power materials explained the importance of frequent conversations between parents and children and of using encouraging rather than discouraging comments and the PRA reviewed age-appropriate activities in the Learning Games book, and the importance of daily reading using the provided children's book as an example.
language power counseling
The Language Power materials explained the importance of frequent conversations between parents and children and of using encouraging rather than discouraging comments and the PRA reviewed age-appropriate activities in the Learning Games book, and the importance of daily reading using the provided children's book as an example.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ear pain counseling
The Ear Pain counseling materials reviewed concepts such as how to recognize ear pain and safely provide pain relief, and how to recognize danger signs that require urgent medical attention. Families were also encouraged to schedule an appointment in the CHC for a possible ear infection rather than going to the emergency department or urgent care facility after hours.
language power counseling
The Language Power materials explained the importance of frequent conversations between parents and children and of using encouraging rather than discouraging comments and the PRA reviewed age-appropriate activities in the Learning Games book, and the importance of daily reading using the provided children's book as an example.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Down syndrome
* Cardiac disease
* Immunodeficiency disorder
* Family's primary language was something other than English or Spanish
12 Months
15 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen Berman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Childrens Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
09-0270
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id