Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy With or Without Concurrent Chemotherapy for Stage II Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT ID: NCT02610010
Last Updated: 2015-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE3
462 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-11-30
2025-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators' retrospective study (PMID:26528755 ) indicated that low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T1N1M0, T2N0-1M0 or T3N0M0, the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system) patients who underwent IMRT could not benefit from cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy. Therefore, the investigators perform this randomized controlled trial to address this question, on a prudent assumption that IMRT alone was not inferior to IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy in stage II patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
IMRT alone
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy without cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy
Cisplatin
Cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles during radiotherapy.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cisplatin
Cisplatin 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks for 3 cycles during radiotherapy.
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Tumor staged as T1N1M0 or T2N0-1M0 (the 2010 UICC/AJCC staging system).
* Karnofsky scale (KPS) ≥ 70.
* Adequate marrow: leucocyte count ≥ 4×10E9/L, hemoglobin ≥ 110g/L and platelet count ≥ 100×10E9/L.
* Normal liver function test: Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) and bilirubin ≤ 1.5×upper limit of normal (ULN) concomitant with alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≤ 2.5×ULN.
* Adequate renal function: creatinine clearance ≥ 60 ml/min or creatinine ≤ 1.5×ULN.
* Patients must give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnancy or lactation (consider pregnancy test in women of child-bearing age and emphasize effective contraception during the treatment period).
* History of previous radiotherapy (except for non-melanomatous skin cancers outside intended radiotherapy volume).
* Prior radiotherapy, chemotherapy or surgery (except diagnostic) to primary tumor or nodes.
* Any severe intercurrent disease, which may bring unacceptable risk or affect the compliance of the trial, for example, unstable cardiac disease requiring treatment, renal disease, chronic hepatitis, diabetes with poor control (fasting plasma glucose \> 1.5×ULN), and emotional disturbance.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
OTHER
Sun Yat-sen University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fang-Yun Xie
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fang-Yun Xie, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhang LN, Gao YH, Lan XW, Tang J, Su Z, Ma J, Deng W, OuYang PY, Xie FY. Propensity score matching analysis of cisplatin-based concurrent chemotherapy in low risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era. Oncotarget. 2015 Dec 22;6(41):44019-29. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5806.
Su Z, Mao YP, Tang J, Lan XW, OuYang PY, Xie FY. Long-term outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with IMRT: a retrospective study. Tumour Biol. 2016 Apr;37(4):4429-38. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4266-5. Epub 2015 Oct 25.
Chen QY, Wen YF, Guo L, Liu H, Huang PY, Mo HY, Li NW, Xiang YQ, Luo DH, Qiu F, Sun R, Deng MQ, Chen MY, Hua YJ, Guo X, Cao KJ, Hong MH, Qian CN, Mai HQ. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma: phase III randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Dec 7;103(23):1761-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr432. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Lai SZ, Li WF, Chen L, Luo W, Chen YY, Liu LZ, Sun Y, Lin AH, Liu MZ, Ma J. How does intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy influence the treatment results in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jul 1;80(3):661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.024. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
Zhang MX, Li J, Shen GP, Zou X, Xu JJ, Jiang R, You R, Hua YJ, Sun Y, Ma J, Hong MH, Chen MY. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma compared with conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy: A 10-year experience with a large cohort and long follow-up. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2587-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
Peng G, Wang T, Yang KY, Zhang S, Zhang T, Li Q, Han J, Wu G. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):286-93. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015-FXY-066-Dept. of RT
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id