Shock Wave Therapy: Do the External Appearance of the Device Influence Clinical Outcomes?

NCT ID: NCT02608723

Last Updated: 2015-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

135 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-06-30

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To check in patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis treated with shock wave therapy, if the outward appearance of the device affects clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Design: a controlled, randomized, parallel assessor-blinded clinical trial.

Patients suffering from chronic plantar fasciitis (duration more than 6 months) will be assigned to three different groups:

* Group I: Treatment applied by standard shock waves device.
* Group II: Shock wave therapy applied by a modified standard device to offer more attractive, more technical, smarter, better appearance, larger and with an expansion of external information devices more sophisticated.
* Group III: Shock wave therapy applied by a modified standard device to offer a more austere, disfigured, unattractive, modest and smaller external appearance.

The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices will be identical; the only difference will be the external image of the device.

The main outcome will be the function of the foot by the FFI (Foot Function Index) questionnaire.

As secondary variables: pain by VAS (Visual Analogical Scale) in different situations, the plantar fascia thickness measured by ultrasound, and the perception of patient recovery measured with the Likert scale. Adverse effects, painkillers consumption and pain experienced during the treatment of shock waves were also assessed.

The patients will be followed and monitored for a month, two months and four months after treatment finished.

For the statistical analysis of clinical variables, ANOVA (analysis of variance) will be performed to check whether the evolution of patients over time was different depending on the device applied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plantar Fasciitis Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard shock waves device

Intervention Type DEVICE

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Austere shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Austere shock waves device

Intervention Type DEVICE

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Sophisticated shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sophisticated shock waves device

Intervention Type DEVICE

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Standard shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Austere shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sophisticated shock waves device

3 sessions were applied: one per week. Energy flux density 0,18 mJ/mm2. Frequency: 8 Hz. 2500 shockwaves/session. The shock waves emitted to the 3 devices are identical; the only difference is the external image of the device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age greater than 18 years.
2. Being able to understand the explanations about the potential benefits and risks of study participation.
3. Diagnosis of chronic plantar fasciitis. Proven by clinical examination: Meeting at least 2 of the following criteria:

* Tenderness in the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia (area of the medial calcaneal tuberosity).
* Pain during the first steps to get out of bed in the morning and / or after a period of rest time.
4. With a duration of symptoms ≥ 6 months at the time of study entry.
5. Having received conservative therapy without success, at least two treatments. Treatments may have been made isolated, combined or consecutively.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Bilateral plantar fasciitis.
2. Hiper/ hypothyroidism.
3. Diabetes mellitus.
4. Treatment with anticoagulants
5. Inflammatory diseases.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Asociacion Colaboracion Cochrane Iberoamericana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Antoni Morral, PhDc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rehabilitation Center "Salut i Esport"

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rehabilitation Center "Salut i Esport"

Santa Perpètua de Gaià, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1304

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id