Trial Outcomes & Findings for Post-Marketing Use Of CT-P13 (Infliximab) For Standard Of Care Treatment Of Rheumatoid Diseases Who Are Naïve To Biologics Or Switched From Remicade (NCT NCT02605642)
NCT ID: NCT02605642
Last Updated: 2020-01-13
Results Overview
Persistence (in days) was defined as a continuous variable measured in time from index date until date of drug discontinuation. Drug discontinuation was defined as either switching to another non infliximab BDMARD or elapsing of a drug free interval of 16 weeks from CT-P13. For participants undergoing a switch to CT-P13 from Remicade, the index date was considered the date from which Remicade was originally commenced and for participants who initiated treatment with CT-P13 as their first biologic, the index date was considered the date from which CT-P13 was initiated.
COMPLETED
351 participants
During the observation period of 2 years
2020-01-13
Participant Flow
351 participants were included in this study, however, 17 participants were excluded from all analysis (they were neither BDMARD naive nor switched from Remicade). They switched to CT-P13 from a BDMARD other than Remicade, therefore not considered for any analysis.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
227
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
Safety Set
|
221
|
107
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
131
|
86
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
96
|
21
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
11
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Participant non-compliance
|
2
|
4
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
10
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
12
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
14
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
23
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of response
|
24
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Total
n=328 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.54 • n=221 Participants
|
52.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=107 Participants
|
53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.23 • n=328 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
118 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
166 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
103 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
162 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
212 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
106 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
318 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
6 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
1 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Height
|
168.44 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.467 • n=220 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
173.19 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.592 • n=106 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
169.98 centimeter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.080 • n=326 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
|
Body Weight
|
80.80 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.613 • n=221 Participants
|
83.21 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.442 • n=107 Participants
|
81.59 kilograms
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.592 • n=328 Participants
|
|
Body Mass Index
|
28.51 kilogram per meter square
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.521 • n=220 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
27.74 kilogram per meter square
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.968 • n=106 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
28.26 kilogram per meter square
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.672 • n=326 Participants • Number analyzed signifies participants evaluable for this baseline measure.
|
|
Participants with Medical History
|
221 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
328 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Surgery Status
Yes
|
20 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
|
Surgery Status
No
|
201 Participants
n=221 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
296 Participants
n=328 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the observation period of 2 yearsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period.
Persistence (in days) was defined as a continuous variable measured in time from index date until date of drug discontinuation. Drug discontinuation was defined as either switching to another non infliximab BDMARD or elapsing of a drug free interval of 16 weeks from CT-P13. For participants undergoing a switch to CT-P13 from Remicade, the index date was considered the date from which Remicade was originally commenced and for participants who initiated treatment with CT-P13 as their first biologic, the index date was considered the date from which CT-P13 was initiated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Treatment Persistence With CT-P13 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
|
404.10 days
Standard Deviation 291.33
|
542.30 days
Standard Deviation 268.55
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 1 of 2 year observation periodPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period. Here, 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
Disease duration was defined as the number of months from initial diagnosis of rheumatoid disease (RA, AS or PsA) to the date of informed consent, which was recorded at the time of inclusion in the study (Day 1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Duration in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), as Recorded on the Day of Inclusion in Study
Disease Type: RA
|
52.928 months
Interval 0.03 to 563.91
|
189.142 months
Interval 12.65 to 400.2
|
|
Disease Duration in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), as Recorded on the Day of Inclusion in Study
Disease Type: AS
|
35.039 months
Interval 0.03 to 551.89
|
159.376 months
Interval 14.65 to 418.33
|
|
Disease Duration in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA), as Recorded on the Day of Inclusion in Study
Disease Type: PsA
|
33.084 months
Interval 0.03 to 386.5
|
133.979 months
Interval 18.4 to 464.07
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 1 of 2 year observation periodPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period. Here "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Initial dose of CT-P13 infusion (dose at the time of CT-P13 treatment initiation) was reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=207 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=102 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Initial Dose of CT-P13 Infusion Administered to Participants
|
3.00 milligram per kilogram
Interval 2.4 to 6.2
|
4.00 milligram per kilogram
Interval 2.0 to 6.6
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) of 2 year observation periodPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period. Here "Overall number of participants analyzed" signifies participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure.
Initial frequency of CT-P13 infusion was categorized as: once every 4, 6, 8 weeks and other. 'Other' included all other frequencies other than specified. Number of participants by baseline infusion frequency (in weeks) were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=207 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=102 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Initial Frequency of CT-P13 Infusion Received
Once every 4 weeks
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Initial Frequency of CT-P13 Infusion Received
Once every 6 weeks
|
79 Participants
|
42 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Initial Frequency of CT-P13 Infusion Received
Once every 8 weeks
|
73 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants by Initial Frequency of CT-P13 Infusion Received
Other
|
52 Participants
|
15 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the observation period of 2 yearsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period.
Total dose of infusion received by the participants were evaluated.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Total Dose of CT-P13 Infusion Received During Observation Period
|
35.00 milligram per kilogram
Interval 2.4 to 90.0
|
46.50 milligram per kilogram
Interval 3.0 to 112.2
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the observation period of 2 yearsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period.
Participants who had change in the dose of infusion (either dose reduction or increase in dose) during the observation period were reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change in CT-P13 Infusion Dose
|
40 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the observation period of 2 yearsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period.
Concomitant medications included corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs (NSAID'S) and immunosuppressant. Participants were counted in more than one categories. 'Others' included DMARDS and other medications apart from the categories specified.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Had At Least One Concomitant Medication Related to the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Corticosteroids
|
28 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Had At Least One Concomitant Medication Related to the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
NSAID's
|
27 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Had At Least One Concomitant Medication Related to the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Immunosuppressants
|
48 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Had At Least One Concomitant Medication Related to the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Other
|
26 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Had At Least One Concomitant Medication Related to the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) or Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Missing
|
7 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: During the observation period of 2 yearsPopulation: The safety population was defined as all participants who received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period.
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying), persistent or significant disability or incapacity, congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of infusion up to 2 years, that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Serious infections including sepsis (excluding opportunistic infections and tuberculosis) were the pre-defined TEAE of special Interest for this study. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
SAEs
|
19 Participants
|
10 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
TEAEs
|
97 Participants
|
29 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)
TEAEs of Special Interest
|
24 Participants
|
8 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 and had at least one post-dose assessment for DAS28. 'Overall number of participants analyzed': participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
DAS28 calculated from the number of tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) using 28 joints count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour; ranged from 0 to 150), and a participant's general health assessment (GH) on a 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) (ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicated worsening of health condition). Total DAS28 score ranged from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicated more disease activity. DAS28 less than or equal to (\<=) 3.2 implied low, greater than (\>) 3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate, and \>5.1 implied high disease activity. DAS28=0.56\*sqrt(28TJC)+0.28\*sqrt(28SJC)+0.70\*ln(ESR)+0.014\*GH; where ln = natural logarithm and sqrt = square root of.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=92 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=41 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
4.033 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5186
|
2.641 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1401
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-1.269 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5981
|
0.210 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1452
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-0.642 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1220
|
-0.432 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6097
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.795 units on a scale
|
0.534 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9656
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 and had at least one post-dose assessment for DAS28. 'Overall number of participants analyzed': participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
DAS28 calculated from the number of TJC and SJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeters per hour; ranged from 0 to 150), and participant's GH on a 100 mm VAS (ranging from 0 mm \[very well\] to 100 mm \[extremely bad\], higher scores indicated worsening of health condition). Total DAS28 score ranged from 0 (none) to 9.4 (extreme disease activity), higher scores indicated more disease activity. DAS28 \<= 3.2 implied low, \> 3.2 to \<=5.1 implied moderate, and \>5.1 implied high disease activity. DAS28=0.56\*sqrt(28TJC)+0.28\*sqrt(28SJC)+0.70\*ln(ESR)+0.014\*GH; where ln = natural logarithm and sqrt = square root of.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=46 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=28 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
3.755 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7767
|
2.351 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0677
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-0.913 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8785
|
0.152 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2737
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-0.006 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7984
|
0.259 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3916
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.747 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2115
|
0.840 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9880
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) in Participants With Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-0.543 units on a scale
|
0.313 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2436
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 and had at least one post-dose assessment for BASDAI. 'Overall number of participants analyzed': participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
BASDAI is a self-reported measure of disease activity in participants with AS. Participants answered 6 questions measuring symptoms of AS (fatigue, spinal pain, joint pain or swelling, areas of localized tenderness, morning stiffness duration and severity). The BASDAI total score was calculated by computing the mean of questions 5 and 6 and adding it to the sum of questions (Q) 1-4. This score was then divided by 5. BASDAI=Q1+Q2+Q3+Q4+\[Q5+Q6/2\]/5. The total BASDAI score ranges from 1=none to 10=severe, where lower score indicated less disease activity. The level of AS disease activity was interpreted as low (BASDAI \< 4) or high (BASDAI \> 4).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=77 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=38 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
4.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.263
|
3.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.313
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.911
|
0.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.470
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.816
|
0.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.304
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.153
|
-0.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.015
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.167
|
-1.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.875
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 and had at least one post-dose assessment for ASDAS. 'Overall number of participants analyzed': participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
ASDAS is used to assess disease activity in participants with AS. It is a score combining the assessment of overall pain (Q1), duration of morning stiffness (Q2), peripheral pain/swelling (Q3), PtGA (assessed on a sale of 0 to 10, where 0 = not active and 10=very active), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in milligrams per liter (mg/L). ASDAS total score was derived using the following formula: ASDAS=0.12\*Q1+0.06\*Q2+0.11\*GH+0.07\*Q3+0.58\*ln (CRP+1). The level of AS disease activity was interpreted as inactive disease (ASDAS\< 1.3), moderate disease activity (1.3 \<= ASDAS \< 2.1), high disease activity (2.1\<= ASDAS \<=3.5) and very high disease activity (ASDAS \> 3.5).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=77 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=38 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6,12,18 and 24
Baseline
|
3.153 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1082
|
2.151 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0456
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6,12,18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-0.875 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.3108
|
-0.023 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1017
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6,12,18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-0.379 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9905
|
-0.452 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.8156
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6,12,18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.603 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7745
|
-0.002 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3630
|
|
Change From Baseline in Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6,12,18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-1.154 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2293
|
-0.356 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.7080
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 and had at least one post-dose assessment for BASFI. 'Overall number of participants analyzed': participants who were evaluable for this outcome measure. 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
BASFI is a validated self assessment tool to determine the degree of functional limitation in participants with AS. It is comprised of 10 questions which were answered by participants using a VAS ranging from 0 (being easy) to 10 (impossible). BASFI total score was calculated as the average score of the 10 questions, and ranges from 0 (no functional impairment) to 10 (maximal impairment), higher scores indicated more impairment.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=77 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=38 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.379
|
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.012
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
4.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.804
|
2.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.492
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.107
|
0.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.146
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.085
|
0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.228
|
|
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) in Participants With Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.194
|
0.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.257
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of HAQ-DI. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty a participant had experienced in 8 domains of daily activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and other activities. Each item scored on a 4-point scale from 0 to 3 with 0 ="no difficulty", 1 ="some difficulty", 2 = "much difficulty", and 3 ="unable to do". Overall score was computed as the sum of scores divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range was 0-3 with 0 = "no difficulty to 3 ="unable to do". Higher score indicate more difficulty in performing daily living activities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
0.956 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7493
|
0.646 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6684
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-0.216 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5906
|
0.026 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3648
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-0.207 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5739
|
-0.043 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5144
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.150 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.4650
|
-0.021 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.3878
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-0.398 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.6918
|
-0.153 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7336
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of EQ-5D-3L. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcomes. It consists of two parts: EQ-5D descriptive system (Part I) and the EQ-VAS (Part II). EQ-5D-3L Part II uses a vertical graduated VAS to measure health status on a scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicating a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
62.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.55
|
70.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.71
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
6.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.55
|
0.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.66
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
4.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.93
|
1.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.06
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.71
|
-0.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.98
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life- 5 Dimensions 3 Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.28
|
12.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.99
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of EQ-5D-3L. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
EQ-5D-3L is a standardized, participant-administered measure of self-reported health outcomes. It consists of two parts: EQ-5D descriptive system (Part I) and the EQ-VAS (Part II). For Part I, i.e. EQ-5D-3L index score, participants rated their current health state on 5 single-item dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with each dimension having three levels of function:. 1=no problems, 2=some problems and 3=extreme problems. Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score was transformed and results in a total score range of -0.074 to 1.00; higher scores indicating a better health state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
0.106 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2093
|
-0.002 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1900
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
0.627 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2260
|
0.757 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1906
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
0.097 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2309
|
0.004 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1859
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
0.102 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1522
|
-0.041 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1416
|
|
Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
0.090 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1479
|
-0.004 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1735
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of SF-12v2. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
The SF-12v2 is a self-administered, validated, multipurpose SF questionnaire to measure generic health status. It consists of 12 items, which are categorized into eight domains (subscales) of functioning and well-being: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, energy and vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. These eight domains are further summarized into PCS and mental component summary (MCS). The score range for each of these 2 summary scores was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores indicated a better health-related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
3.988 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.6626
|
0.683 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8907
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
2.325 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1633
|
0.295 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.0411
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
4.238 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.2347
|
1.712 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.9035
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
37.018 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1214
|
41.865 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2835
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
2.679 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.5359
|
0.638 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.5793
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of SF-12v2. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
The SF-12v2 is a self-administered, validated, multipurpose SF questionnaire to measure generic health status. It consists of 12 items, which are categorized into eight domains (subscales) of functioning and well-being: physical function, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perceptions, energy and vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. The score range for each of the 8 health aspects was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health), higher scores indicating good health condition. These eight domains are further summarized into PCS and mental component summary (MCS). The score range for each of these 2 summary scores was from 0 (poor health) to 100 (better health). Higher scores indicated a better health-related quality of life.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
1.457 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0383
|
-1.145 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9283
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
47.154 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9659
|
52.152 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8788
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
2.603 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.9694
|
-0.412 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.7364
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
1.435 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.1599
|
0.119 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.3434
|
|
Change From Baseline in Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of Short Form 12 Version 2 (SF-12v2) Health Survey at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-0.593 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7558
|
5.111 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.0804
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Months 6, 12, 18 and 24Population: Analysis was performed on participants who had received at least one dose of CT-P13 during the study observation period and had at least one post-dose assessment of PGA. Here 'Number analyzed' = Participants evaluable for this outcome measure at specified rows.
PGA of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extremely active. Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=215 Participants
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 Participants
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Rheumatoid Diseases Activity at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Baseline
|
34.9 millimeters
Standard Deviation 27.80
|
18.4 millimeters
Standard Deviation 17.27
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Rheumatoid Diseases Activity at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 6
|
-13.4 millimeters
Standard Deviation 26.94
|
0.6 millimeters
Standard Deviation 18.07
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Rheumatoid Diseases Activity at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 12
|
-19.2 millimeters
Standard Deviation 23.17
|
-1.5 millimeters
Standard Deviation 19.02
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Rheumatoid Diseases Activity at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 18
|
-12.5 millimeters
Standard Deviation 20.58
|
2.1 millimeters
Standard Deviation 11.75
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Rheumatoid Diseases Activity at Months 6, 12, 18 and 24
Change at Month 24
|
-25.6 millimeters
Standard Deviation 23.49
|
-3.4 millimeters
Standard Deviation 12.27
|
Adverse Events
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 participants at risk
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 participants at risk
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Autoimmune hepatitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Gallbladder polyp
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Necrotising herpetic retinopathy
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pilonidal cyst
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pelvic fracture
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial adenocarcinoma
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lip squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Transitional cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Product Issues
Device loosening
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombophlebitis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Biologic Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (BDMARD) Naive
n=221 participants at risk
BDMARD naive participants who were receiving CT-P13 according to the summary of product characteristics (SmPC and Product Monograph) as determined by the investigator, were included in this group and observed in this study for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
Participants Who Switched From Remicade to CT-P13
n=107 participants at risk
Participants who were previously treated with Remicade, switched to CT-P13 and started receiving CT-P13 (according to the SmPC and Product Monograph; as determined by the investigator) from stable treatment with Remicade, were included in this group and observed for a duration of up to 2 years.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiomyopathy
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Eye disorders
Uveitis
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
1.4%
3/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous ulcer
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Cyst
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Drug ineffective
|
11.3%
25/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
5.6%
6/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Impaired healing
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Nodule
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Peripheral swelling
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Gallbladder polyp
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hypertransaminasaemia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver disorder
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.4%
3/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye infection
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Febrile infection
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes virus infection
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasal herpes
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.7%
6/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
1.9%
2/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Periodontitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngotonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.4%
3/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2.7%
6/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
3.7%
4/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Epicondylitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Exposure during pregnancy
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
6.3%
14/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
1.9%
2/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Drug specific antibody
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Liver function test increased
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Investigations
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex test positive
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D deficiency
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bursitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Chondropathy
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint swelling
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.90%
2/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatic disorder
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Rheumatoid arthritis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovitis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Vertebral foraminal stenosis
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Basal cell carcinoma
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
2.7%
6/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intercostal neuralgia
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cyst
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmoplantar pustulosis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin induration
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Carpal tunnel decompression
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Varicose vein operation
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.45%
1/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.00%
0/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral coldness
|
0.00%
0/221 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
0.93%
1/107 • During the observation period of 2 years
Same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in 1 participant and as non-serious in another, or a participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event. Safety population was evaluated.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER