12 Weeks of Ledipasvir (LDV)/Sofosbuvir (SOF) With Weight-based Ribavirin vs. 24 Weeks of LDV/SOF

NCT ID: NCT02605304

Last Updated: 2018-05-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

7 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-17

Study Completion Date

2017-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

People who are infected with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) have a great chance of being cured of the infection when they are treated with sofosbuvir. However, in some instances, treatment with sofosbuvir-containing therapy does not work. It is not known if people respond to retreatment with sofosbuvir, after it did not work the first time. There is an important need to understand retreatment options in those instances. This clinical trial was done to study the response to two different regimens, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin, and to see if they are safe and well-tolerated in HCV-infected persons whose previous treatment with sofosbuvir had failed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There is a pressing need to understand appropriate retreatment options for HCV-infected patients who fail direct acting antiviral (DAA)-based regimens. To date, over 100,000 prescriptions have been written for SOF. Recent data indicate that SOF-based treatment defined as SOF/RBV, SOF/pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)/RBV or SOF/simeprevir (SIM) +/- RBV have led to treatment response of 70-92% in HCV genotype (GT) 1 patients, depending on the regimen used and presence of liver cirrhosis. Thus, there is a growing number of individuals who have failed SOF-based regimens and are in need of a retreatment strategy, the majority of which are anticipated to be HCV GT1, given the US distribution of genotypes. There are no data to inform retreatment strategies for HIV-infected individuals with SOF failure, who have traditionally represented a harder to treat group and are impacted by DAA-antiretroviral (ARV) interactions.

This was a phase II retreatment study of HCV GT1 and HIV coinfected participants who had previous HCV virologic failure on a SOF-based regimen. Participants were randomized to one of two treatment arms: 12 weeks of LDV/SOF with weight-based RBV (Arm A) or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF alone (Arm B). The targeted sample size was 40, 20 participants in each arm.

Post-entry, the study visits were scheduled at weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 after study entry (with week 16, 20, 24 visits limited to those on the 24-week regimen), and at 4, 12 and 24 weeks after treatment discontinuation. The total study duration was 36 weeks in Arm A and 48 weeks in Arm B. At each visit, a physical examination and blood collection were conducted. HCV RNA was tested at each visit. For female participants of reproductive potential, pregnancy tests were done. At on-treatment visits, participants also completed an HCV treatment adherence questionnaire. Urinalysis was conducted at all on-treatment visits and at 4 weeks post treatment. At select visits, plasma, whole blood, urine and dried blood spots were collected.

The study was randomized because there was clinical equipoise on the benefits and drawbacks in the two study arms. The study was not designed to be powered for comparisons between the randomized study arms, and no formal statistical comparisons were conducted. The primary analysis was conducted as a single-arm analysis for each regimen.

The study experienced enrollment difficulties due to the small number of HCV treatment failures from select SOF-based regimens who would be eligible for this study, and closed to accrual prematurely. The participants enrolled remained on study until completion of follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV-1 Infection Hepatitis C

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm A: LDV/SOF + RBV

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 12 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants were prescribed one fixed dose tablet of LDV 90 mg/SOF 400 mg orally per day.

Ribavirin

Intervention Type DRUG

Based on weight at entry:

For weight \<75 kg, participants were prescribed 1000 mg of RBV per day, divided into two doses to be taken orally.

For weight ≥75 kg: participants were prescribed 1200 mg of RBV per day, divided into two doses to be taken orally.

Arm B: LDV/SOF

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants were prescribed one fixed dose tablet of LDV 90 mg/SOF 400 mg orally per day.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir

Participants were prescribed one fixed dose tablet of LDV 90 mg/SOF 400 mg orally per day.

Intervention Type DRUG

Ribavirin

Based on weight at entry:

For weight \<75 kg, participants were prescribed 1000 mg of RBV per day, divided into two doses to be taken orally.

For weight ≥75 kg: participants were prescribed 1200 mg of RBV per day, divided into two doses to be taken orally.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LDV/SOF Harvoni RBV

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willing and able to provide written informed consent
* Documentation of non-cirrhotic or cirrhotic status
* HIV-1 infection
* HIV antiretroviral treatment status (ART), CD4+ T-cell (CD4) count and HIV-1 RNA as follows: (1) not on ART with CD4 count \>500 cells/mm\^3 within 42 days of study entry, (2) elite controller not on ART with CD4 \>200 cells/mm\^3 within 42 days of study entry and HIV-1 RNA \<500 copies/mL on all measurements within 48 weeks prior to study entry, (3) on a stable protocol-approved ART with CD4 count \>200 cells/mm\^3 and HIV-1 RNA \<50 copies/mL within 42 days of study entry
* HCV GT-1 within 12 months prior to study entry
* Prior virologic treatment failure with SOF-containing regimen (SOF/RBV, SOF/PEG/RBV, and SOF/SIM)
* Body mass index (BMI) ≥18 kg/m\^2 within 42 days prior to study entry
* Certain laboratory values obtained within 42 days prior to study entry
* Hemoglobin ≥12.0 g/dL for male, ≥11.0 g/dL for female participants
* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (SGOT) and Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (SGOT) \<10 x ULN
* For female participants of reproductive potential, a negative serum pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 25 mIU/mL performed at screening and within 48 hours prior to study entry
* Agreement to use at least two reliable forms of contraceptive simultaneously while receiving study treatment and for 6 months afterward
* Intention to comply with the dosing instructions and study schedule of assessments

Exclusion Criteria

* Receipt of any investigational drug or device within 60 days prior to study entry
* Prior exposure to a DAA other than SOF and SIM
* Chronic liver disease of a non-HCV etiology
* Presence of active or acute AIDS-defining opportunistic infections within 42 days prior to study entry
* Active, serious infection (other than HIV-1 or HCV) requiring parenteral antibiotics, antivirals, or antifungals within 42 days prior to study entry
* Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (defined as HBsAg positive) within 42 days prior to study entry
* History of clinically significant hemoglobinopathy
* Chronic current use of systemically administered immunosuppressive agents
* History of solid organ transplantation
* Current or prior history of clinical hepatic decompensation
* History of a gastrointestinal disorder (or postoperative condition) that could interfere with the absorption of the study drug
* History of significant or symptomatic pulmonary disease, cardiac disease, or porphyria that in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the study
* History of difficulty with blood collection and/or poor venous access for the purposes of phlebotomy
* Active drug or alcohol use or dependence
* Use of any prohibited concomitant medications per the LDV/SOF product labeling, within 42 days prior to study entry
* Known hypersensitivity to RBV, SOF, LDV, their metabolites, or formulation excipients or any other contraindication to the use of RBV, SOF or LDV
* Currently receiving zidovudine (ZDV), didanosine (ddI), stavudine (d4T) or tipranavir
* Acute HIV infection defined as the phase immediately following infection during which anti-HIV antibodies are undetectable
* Known hepatocellular carcinoma
* Breastfeeding or pregnancy
* A male participant with a pregnant female partner
* Receipt of colony stimulating agents, including but not limited to erythropoietin, within 42 days prior to study entry
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Annie Luetkemeyer, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of California, San Francisco HIV/AIDS CRS

Jennifer J. Kiser, PharmD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ucsf Aids Crs (801)

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

7804 Weill Cornell Chelsea CRS

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tam E, Luetkemeyer AF, Mantry PS, Satapathy SK, Ghali P, Kang M, Haubrich R, Shen X, Ni L, Camus G, Copans A, Rossaro L, Guyer B, Brown RS Jr; RESCUE and ACTG A5348 study investigators. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for treatment of hepatitis C virus in sofosbuvir-experienced, NS5A treatment-naive patients: Findings from two randomized trials. Liver Int. 2018 Jun;38(6):1010-1021. doi: 10.1111/liv.13616. Epub 2017 Dec 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29091342 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://rsc.tech-res.com/docs/default-source/safety/daids_ae_grading_table_v2_nov2014.pdf?sfvrsn=8

DAIDS Table for Grading the Severity of Adult and Pediatric Adverse Events (DAIDS AE Grading Table), Version 2.0, November 2014

http://rsc.tech-res.com/docs/default-source/safety/manual_for_expedited_reporting_aes_to_daids_v2.pdf?sfvrsn=12

Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS (DAIDS EAE Manual), Version 2.0, January 2010

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UM1AI068636

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

ACTG A5348

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.