Safety and Efficacy of Switching From Dolutegravir and ABC/3TC or ABC/DTG/3TC to B/F/TAF in HIV-1 Infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed

NCT ID: NCT02603120

Last Updated: 2020-11-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

567 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-11

Study Completion Date

2019-10-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of switching from a regimen of dolutegravir (DTG) and abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC) or a fixed dose combination (FDC) of abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine (ABC/DTG/3TC) to a FDC of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF) versus continuing DTG and ABC/3TC as the FDC ABC/DTG/3TC in virologically suppressed Human Immunodeficiency Virus- 1 (HIV-1) infected adults.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV-1 Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Blinded Phase: B/F/TAF

B/F/TAF + ABC/DTG/3TC placebo for at least 48 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

B/F/TAF

Intervention Type DRUG

50/200/25 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

ABC/DTG/3TC Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Blinded Phase: ABC/DTG/3TC

ABC/DTG/3TC + B/F/TAF placebo for at least 48 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ABC/DTG/3TC

Intervention Type DRUG

600/50/300 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

B/F/TAF Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Open-Label Phase

At the End of Blinded Treatment Visit, if safety and efficacy of B/F/TAF is demonstrated following review of unblinded data, participants in a country where B/F/TAF FDC is not available will be given the option to receive B/F/TAF FDC in an open-label extension phase for up to 96 weeks, or until the product becomes accessible to subjects through an access program, or until Gilead Sciences elects to discontinue the study in that country, whichever occurs first.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

B/F/TAF

Intervention Type DRUG

50/200/25 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ABC/DTG/3TC

600/50/300 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Intervention Type DRUG

B/F/TAF

50/200/25 mg FDC tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Intervention Type DRUG

ABC/DTG/3TC Placebo

Tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Intervention Type DRUG

B/F/TAF Placebo

Tablets administered orally once daily without regard to food

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Triumeq® Bictegravir (previously referred to as GS-9883)/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide Biktarvy® [BVY]

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 50 mL/min (≥ 0.83 mL/sec).
* Currently receiving an antiretroviral regimen of DTG + ABC/3TC, or ABC/DTG/3TC FDC for ≥ 3 months prior to the screening visit.
* HIV ribonucleic acid (RNA) \< 50 copies/mL at the screening visit.
* Currently on a stable regimen for ≥ 3 months preceding the screening visit with documented plasma HIV-1 RNA \< 50 copies/mL for ≥ 3 months preceding the screening visit (or undetectable HIV-1 RNA level according to the local assay being used if the limit of detection is ≥ 50 copies/mL).
* Have no documented or suspected resistance to emtricitabine (FTC), tenofovir (TFV), DTG, ABC or 3TC.

Exclusion Criteria

* Current alcohol or substance use judged by the Investigator to potentially interfere with subject study compliance.
* Active tuberculosis infection.
* Individuals experiencing decompensated cirrhosis (eg, ascites, encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding).
* Females who are pregnant.
* Females who are breastfeeding.
* Acute hepatitis in the 30 days prior to study entry.
* Chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) infection.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gilead Sciences

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gilead Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Gilead Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Palm Springs, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Leandro, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ft. Pierce, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Wilton Manors, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Berkley, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Buffalo, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Huntersville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Longview, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Nice, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Essen, , Germany

Site Status

Frankfurt am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Badalona, , Spain

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

Brighton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada France Germany Italy Puerto Rico Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Andreatta K, Willkom M, Martin R, Chang S, Wei L, Liu H, Liu YP, Graham H, Quirk E, Martin H, White KL. Switching to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide maintained HIV-1 RNA suppression in participants with archived antiretroviral resistance including M184V/I. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Dec 1;74(12):3555-3564. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz347.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31430369 (View on PubMed)

Molina JM, Ward D, Brar I, Mills A, Stellbrink HJ, Lopez-Cortes L, Ruane P, Podzamczer D, Brinson C, Custodio J, Liu H, Andreatta K, Martin H, Cheng A, Quirk E. Switching to fixed-dose bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide from dolutegravir plus abacavir and lamivudine in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1: 48 week results of a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, active-controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2018 Jul;5(7):e357-e365. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30092-4. Epub 2018 Jun 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29925489 (View on PubMed)

Brar I, Ruane PJ, Berhe M, Brinson C, Benson P, Henry K, Liu H, Andreatta K, Hindman JT, Ramgopal M. Efficacy and safety of switch to bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide from dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine: Results from an open-label extension of a phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferiority study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Feb 21;104(8):e41482. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041482.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39993074 (View on PubMed)

Avihingsanon A, Chetchotisakd P, Kiertiburanakul S, Ratanasuwan W, Siripassorn K, Supparatpinyo K, Martin H, Wang H, Wong T, Wang HY. Efficacy and safety of switching to bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed Asian adults living with HIV: A pooled analysis from three international phase III randomized trials. HIV Med. 2023 Mar;24(3):290-300. doi: 10.1111/hiv.13386. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36912172 (View on PubMed)

Wohl D, Clarke A, Maggiolo F, Garner W, Laouri M, Martin H, Quirk E. Patient-Reported Symptoms Over 48 Weeks Among Participants in Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III Non-inferiority Trials of Adults with HIV on Co-formulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide versus Co-formulated Abacavir, Dolutegravir, and Lamivudine. Patient. 2018 Oct;11(5):561-573. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0322-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29956087 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol: Original

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: Amendment 2

View Document

Document Type: Study Protocol: Amendment 1

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-004025-14

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

GS-US-380-1844

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id