Prospective Clinical Analysis of Ultrasound-guided Biceps Corticosteroid Injections

NCT ID: NCT02591953

Last Updated: 2022-07-18

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-11-30

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Using randomization, prospectively determine superiority of either ultrasound-guided or landmark-guided biceps corticosteroid injections with regard to various clinical variables.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients are diagnosed with biceps tendinitis in the outpatient clinic. After diagnosis, all the patients that meet inclusion/exclusion criteria will be offered to enroll in the study. Study will be described to the patient with regard to protocol and consent. All questions regarding the study will be answered, and it will be explicitly described that the study involvement will not change clinical care. It will be explained that investigators expect a follow up appointment at minimum at three weeks and three months. There may be further follow up requested up to 1 year from enrollment.

After collection of informed consent, the patient will be randomized to either ultrasound-guided or landmark-guided injection. The patient will complete clinical scores at the initial visit prior to the injection. After injection, the patient will have follow up scheduled for three weeks and three months. To ensure patient blinding, an ultrasound will be placed on the patient for both groups, but only active imaging with be performed for the ultrasound-guided patient group. For clinician blinding, a different clinician than the injecting clinician will perform the follow up examinations. The patient is instructed to not seek additional injections or physical therapy during the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biceps Tendonitis Injection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound-guided Injection

Injection performed with ultrasound-guidance

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-guidance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using ultrasound-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection

Methylprednisolone

Intervention Type DRUG

Corticosteroid used in injection (40 mg)

Lidocaine 1%

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthesic used in injection

Landmark-guided Injection

Injection performed at point of maximal tenderness along biceps tendon

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Landmark-guidance

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Using landmark-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection

Methylprednisolone

Intervention Type DRUG

Corticosteroid used in injection (40 mg)

Lidocaine 1%

Intervention Type DRUG

Anesthesic used in injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound-guidance

Using ultrasound-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Landmark-guidance

Using landmark-guidance to perform a corticosteroid injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Methylprednisolone

Corticosteroid used in injection (40 mg)

Intervention Type DRUG

Lidocaine 1%

Anesthesic used in injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Pain at intertubercular groove
* Anterior humeral pain
* Positive Speed's Test
* Bicep's tendinitis is primary diagnosis for patient
* Patient agrees to follow up and consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior biceps surgery or injections
* Prior SLAP or labral repair
* Concomitant shoulder arthroplasty
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rush University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jeremy A Alland

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Midwest Orthopeadics at Rush

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hashiuchi T, Sakurai G, Morimoto M, Komei T, Takakura Y, Tanaka Y. Accuracy of the biceps tendon sheath injection: ultrasound-guided or unguided injection? A randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011 Oct;20(7):1069-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.04.004. Epub 2011 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21782470 (View on PubMed)

Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Lause GE. Ultrasound-guided injection for the biceps brachii tendinitis: results and experience. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 May;37(5):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21458143 (View on PubMed)

Ucuncu F, Capkin E, Karkucak M, Ozden G, Cakirbay H, Tosun M, Guler M. A comparison of the effectiveness of landmark-guided injections and ultrasonography guided injections for shoulder pain. Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):786-9. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181acb0e4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19851159 (View on PubMed)

Naredo E, Cabero F, Beneyto P, Cruz A, Mondejar B, Uson J, Palop MJ, Crespo M. A randomized comparative study of short term response to blind injection versus sonographic-guided injection of local corticosteroids in patients with painful shoulder. J Rheumatol. 2004 Feb;31(2):308-14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14760802 (View on PubMed)

Aly AR, Rajasekaran S, Ashworth N. Ultrasound-guided shoulder girdle injections are more accurate and more effective than landmark-guided injections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;49(16):1042-9. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093573. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25403682 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

15101504

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.