MedDataX Logo

Comparison of Nutrition Risk Screens

NCT ID: NCT02585245

Last Updated: 2017-11-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

607 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study will compare two different screens for nutrition risk in patients who are in the hospital. We will be comparing the ThedaCare Nutrition Risk Screen to see if it is as good and consistent as the standard NRS 2002 Nutrition Risk Screen.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research study comparing the ThedaCare screen against the NRS 2002 screen will validate the accuracy and reliability of the ThedaCare Screen and the timeliness of nutrition intervention of patients with a diagnosis of malnutrition. Early nutrition intervention will positively affect the patient's clinical complication, LOS, and readmission.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malnutrition

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Hospital Nutrition screens

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NRS2002 Nutrition Risk Screen

Patients identified at HIgh, medium or Low Risk in Hospitalized patients. Determining accuracy of identifiying patients affected by malnutrition.

No interventions assigned to this group

ThedaCare RD/RN Nutrition Risk Screen

Patients identified at HIgh, medium or Low Risk in Hospitalized patients. Determining accuracy of identifiying patients affected by malnutrition.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 yrs of age
* Hopitalized

Exclusion Criteria

* Positve for Pregnancy
* Inability to give Consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Wisconsin, Madison

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

ThedaCare

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lori LK Hartz, MS, RDN

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

ThedaCare

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

ThedaCare Regional Medical Center- Appleton

Appleton, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

ThedaCare Regional Medical Center

Neenah, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Malone A, Hamilton C. The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition consensus malnutrition characteristics: application in practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013 Dec;28(6):639-50. doi: 10.1177/0884533613508435. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24177285 (View on PubMed)

Kyle UG, Kossovsky MP, Karsegard VL, Pichard C. Comparison of tools for nutritional assessment and screening at hospital admission: a population study. Clin Nutr. 2006 Jun;25(3):409-17. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.11.001. Epub 2005 Dec 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16356595 (View on PubMed)

Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M; Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr. 2003 Aug;22(4):415-21. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(03)00098-0.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12880610 (View on PubMed)

Corkins MR, Guenter P, DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Jensen GL, Malone A, Miller S, Patel V, Plogsted S, Resnick HE; American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Malnutrition diagnoses in hospitalized patients: United States, 2010. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014 Feb;38(2):186-95. doi: 10.1177/0148607113512154. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24247093 (View on PubMed)

Makhija S, Baker J. The Subjective Global Assessment: a review of its use in clinical practice. Nutr Clin Pract. 2008 Aug-Sep;23(4):405-9. doi: 10.1177/0884533608321214.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18682592 (View on PubMed)

Hartz LLK, Stroup BM, Bibelnieks TA, Shockey C, Ney DM. ThedaCare Nutrition Risk Screen Improves the Identification of Non-Intensive Care Unit Patients at Risk for Malnutrition Compared With the Nutrition Risk Screen 2002. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Jan;43(1):70-80. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1315. Epub 2018 Jun 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29959847 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TC0001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id