REGorafenib vsTamoxifen in Patients With Platinum-sensitive OVARian Carcinoma and Isolated Biological Progression
NCT ID: NCT02584465
Last Updated: 2023-09-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
68 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-08-28
2021-09-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Regorafenib Combined With Fulvestrant in Recurrent Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer
NCT05113368
A Study of ABT-263 as Single Agent in Women With Platinum Resistant/Refractory Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
NCT02591095
Olaparib Maintenance With Pembrolizumab & Bevacizumab in BRCA Non-mutated Patients With Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
NCT04361370
Real-life Data of Olaparib in Relapsed Ovarian Cancers Patients
NCT04152941
Phase 2 Trial of Regorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian, Primary Peritoneal and Fallopian Tube Cancer
NCT02278783
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* This multi-modality approach achieves clinical responses in about 70% of patients, although a majority of women eventually relapse and die from disease progression. The first sign of relapse can be a progressively rising CA-125 (Tuxen et al.).
* Biochemical-recurrent of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) is defined as CA-125 elevation above normal values without clinical evidence of disease, and can predate clinical disease by approximately 3-6 months (Tuxen et al.). Even if CA-125 elevation is a harbinger of EOC relapse, the question remains as to whether early therapeutic intervention can translate into extending the duration of survival.
* A few years ago, Rustin reported from ovarian cancer patients on surveillance after first line treatment with isolated elevated CA-125 (without RECIST/symptoms criteria) that there was no benefit to initiate a new chemotherapy compared to surveillance (Rustin et al. Lancet 2010; Rustin et al. Ann Oncol 2011).
* For patients under bevacizumab on maintenance phase at the time of the CA-125 elevation without RECIST or symptoms progression, data are scare. In the GOG0218 trial, elevated CA-125 did not totally complied with RECIST criteria progression. This study reported that the median PFS is longer in patients with continuous bevacizumab (14.1 months), compared to patients under placebo (10.3 months), using CA-125 \& RECIST criteria, supporting the hypothesis that a maintenance treatment with an anti angiogenic agent allows delaying disease progression (Burger et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011). In an analysis of progression-free survival in which data for patients with increased CA-125 levels were censored, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months in the control group but 18.0 months in the bevacizumab-throughout group (hazard ratio, 0.645; P\<0.001). The relationship of CA-125 to progressive disease (PD) may be altered in bevacizumab (BV)-treated patients. In the Ocean trial elevated CA-125 was associated with forthcoming progression for the majority of the patients under bevacizumab (HR 0.48) in the platinum sensitive population (Aghajanian et al.).
* Current international recommendations are to continue the same strategy (surveillance or maintenance bevacizumab) until RECIST or symptomatic progression regardless of the CA-125 level.
* However, some can argue that a waiting attitude is deemed unacceptable due to patient anxiety over a rising CA-125 compelling a significant proportion of physicians to propose a therapeutic intervention, due to the nearness of the disease progression.
* Tamoxifen is an endocrine alternative treatment option in patients with rising CA-125. Hurteau et al. studies supported the use of tamoxifen showing a 17% response rate in measurable recurrent disease, 13% response rate in platinum resistant disease, observed stable disease in 38% of patients lasting a median of 3 months (Hatch, et al).
* The use of tamoxifen treatment as a control arm for isolated CA-125 is thus justified based on a favorable toxicity profile compared with available cytotoxic agents and the lack of interference with subsequent interventions beyond documentation of clinical progression (Marckman, et al). As patients have until today no benefit to introduce a new chemotherapy regimen for isolated elevated CA-125 (Rustin et al 2010), exploring new anti-angiogenic agent could be clinically relevant. Agents that inhibit tumor angiogenesis and invasion were considered to be ideal candidates for the experimental arm given their potential to prolong the duration of disease-free survival while exhibiting a more favorable toxicity profile than cytotoxic drugs.
* Pazopanib and other multi-kinase inhibitors such as cediranib, nintenanib reported activity in relapsing ovarian cancer (sensitive or resistant population) used alone in several phase II trials (Matulonis et al., Ledermann et al., and Friedlander et al.).
* Regorafenib is a new oral multi-kinase inhibitor. It inhibits kinases involved in angiogenesis (VEGFR 1-3, TIE 2), signaling in the tumor microenvironment (PDGFR-β, FGFR) and oncogenesis (KIT, RET and BRAF). Inhibition of tumor growth and formation of metastases were shown in vivo. Tumor activity has been reported in a variety of tumor types. Regorafenib is approved in Europe for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients previously treated with, or who are not considered candidates for, available therapies. An application for GIST progressing after imatinib and sunitinib has obtained the AMM in Europe. The recommended dose is 160 mg taken once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off therapy.
The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A-Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen 40mg/day 2 film-coated tablet containing 20 mg of Tamoxifen/day until progression
Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen: 40 mg/day
B-Regorafenib
Regorafenib 120mg/day 3 film-coated tablet containing 40 mg of Regorafenib/day, 3 weeks/4 until progression
Regorafenib
Stivarga; 120mg/day
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tamoxifen
Tamoxifen: 40 mg/day
Regorafenib
Stivarga; 120mg/day
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
I8 Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions as assessed by the following laboratory tests conducted within 7 days before randomization:
* Absolute Neutrophil Count ≥ 1.5 G/L, platelets count ≥ 100 G/L, and hemoglobin ≥ 9g/dL,
* AST/ALT ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN if liver metastasis) and total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN,
* Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² according to the Modification of Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) abbreviated formula
* Lipase ≤ 1.5 x ULN
* Prothrombine time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) \< 1.5 x ULN. Patients who are therapeutically anticoagulated with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in this parameter exists, I9 Women of childbearing potential and partners must agree to use adequate contraceptive method (if no previous bilateral annexectomies) during the whole study period and for up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment; a negative pregnancy test must be obtained prior to randomization,
Exclusion Criteria
E8 Endocrine therapy administered within 3 years prior to randomization,
E13 History of any of the following :
* abdominal fistula,
* gastrointestinal perforation,
* intra-abdominal abscess,
* any malabsorption condition, E14 Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 4.3 Grade 3 or higher within 30 days before randomization, E15 Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2, E17 Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) \> 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management), E21 Ongoing infection \> Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.3. Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present. Hepatitis C is allowed if no antiviral treatment is required, E23 Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs and symptoms at the time of screening,
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bayer
INDUSTRY
ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpital Jean Minjoz
Besançon, , France
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, , France
Centre Hospitalier de Cholet
Cholet, , France
Centre Jean Perrin
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren
Limoges, , France
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, , France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Hôpital de Mont-de-Marsan
Mont-de-Marsan, , France
Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie
Mougins, , France
ORACLE - Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly
Nancy, , France
Centre Catherine de Sienne
Nantes, , France
Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans
Orléans, , France
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, , France
Clinique Francheville
Périgueux, , France
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, , France
Centre CARIO - HPCA
Plérin, , France
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois
Pringy, , France
Institut Jean Godinot
Reims, , France
ICO Centre René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau
Tours, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GINECO-OV235
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.