REGorafenib vsTamoxifen in Patients With Platinum-sensitive OVARian Carcinoma and Isolated Biological Progression

NCT ID: NCT02584465

Last Updated: 2023-09-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-28

Study Completion Date

2021-09-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* After surgery, most of patients with advanced ovarian/primitive peritoneal /fallopian carcinoma received as first line treatment, carboplatin plus paclitaxel plus or minus bevacizumab for 6 cycles followed by surveillance or bevacizumab maintenance therapy up to one year (GOG (Burger et al.), ICON7 (Perren et al.), French national guidelines Saint Paul de Vence (www.arcagy.org)).
* This multi-modality approach achieves clinical responses in about 70% of patients, although a majority of women eventually relapse and die from disease progression. The first sign of relapse can be a progressively rising CA-125 (Tuxen et al.).
* Biochemical-recurrent of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) is defined as CA-125 elevation above normal values without clinical evidence of disease, and can predate clinical disease by approximately 3-6 months (Tuxen et al.). Even if CA-125 elevation is a harbinger of EOC relapse, the question remains as to whether early therapeutic intervention can translate into extending the duration of survival.
* A few years ago, Rustin reported from ovarian cancer patients on surveillance after first line treatment with isolated elevated CA-125 (without RECIST/symptoms criteria) that there was no benefit to initiate a new chemotherapy compared to surveillance (Rustin et al. Lancet 2010; Rustin et al. Ann Oncol 2011).
* For patients under bevacizumab on maintenance phase at the time of the CA-125 elevation without RECIST or symptoms progression, data are scare. In the GOG0218 trial, elevated CA-125 did not totally complied with RECIST criteria progression. This study reported that the median PFS is longer in patients with continuous bevacizumab (14.1 months), compared to patients under placebo (10.3 months), using CA-125 \& RECIST criteria, supporting the hypothesis that a maintenance treatment with an anti angiogenic agent allows delaying disease progression (Burger et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 2011). In an analysis of progression-free survival in which data for patients with increased CA-125 levels were censored, the median progression-free survival was 12.0 months in the control group but 18.0 months in the bevacizumab-throughout group (hazard ratio, 0.645; P\<0.001). The relationship of CA-125 to progressive disease (PD) may be altered in bevacizumab (BV)-treated patients. In the Ocean trial elevated CA-125 was associated with forthcoming progression for the majority of the patients under bevacizumab (HR 0.48) in the platinum sensitive population (Aghajanian et al.).
* Current international recommendations are to continue the same strategy (surveillance or maintenance bevacizumab) until RECIST or symptomatic progression regardless of the CA-125 level.
* However, some can argue that a waiting attitude is deemed unacceptable due to patient anxiety over a rising CA-125 compelling a significant proportion of physicians to propose a therapeutic intervention, due to the nearness of the disease progression.
* Tamoxifen is an endocrine alternative treatment option in patients with rising CA-125. Hurteau et al. studies supported the use of tamoxifen showing a 17% response rate in measurable recurrent disease, 13% response rate in platinum resistant disease, observed stable disease in 38% of patients lasting a median of 3 months (Hatch, et al).
* The use of tamoxifen treatment as a control arm for isolated CA-125 is thus justified based on a favorable toxicity profile compared with available cytotoxic agents and the lack of interference with subsequent interventions beyond documentation of clinical progression (Marckman, et al). As patients have until today no benefit to introduce a new chemotherapy regimen for isolated elevated CA-125 (Rustin et al 2010), exploring new anti-angiogenic agent could be clinically relevant. Agents that inhibit tumor angiogenesis and invasion were considered to be ideal candidates for the experimental arm given their potential to prolong the duration of disease-free survival while exhibiting a more favorable toxicity profile than cytotoxic drugs.
* Pazopanib and other multi-kinase inhibitors such as cediranib, nintenanib reported activity in relapsing ovarian cancer (sensitive or resistant population) used alone in several phase II trials (Matulonis et al., Ledermann et al., and Friedlander et al.).
* Regorafenib is a new oral multi-kinase inhibitor. It inhibits kinases involved in angiogenesis (VEGFR 1-3, TIE 2), signaling in the tumor microenvironment (PDGFR-β, FGFR) and oncogenesis (KIT, RET and BRAF). Inhibition of tumor growth and formation of metastases were shown in vivo. Tumor activity has been reported in a variety of tumor types. Regorafenib is approved in Europe for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients previously treated with, or who are not considered candidates for, available therapies. An application for GIST progressing after imatinib and sunitinib has obtained the AMM in Europe. The recommended dose is 160 mg taken once daily for 3 weeks followed by 1 week off therapy.

The objective of this randomized phase II is to evaluate the benefit of regorafenib for ovarian patients who reported a confirmed elevated CA-125 level under surveillance or bevacizumab, compared with tamoxifen.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A-Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen 40mg/day 2 film-coated tablet containing 20 mg of Tamoxifen/day until progression

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tamoxifen

Intervention Type DRUG

Tamoxifen: 40 mg/day

B-Regorafenib

Regorafenib 120mg/day 3 film-coated tablet containing 40 mg of Regorafenib/day, 3 weeks/4 until progression

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Regorafenib

Intervention Type DRUG

Stivarga; 120mg/day

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tamoxifen

Tamoxifen: 40 mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Regorafenib

Stivarga; 120mg/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

I2 Histological confirmation of epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, I3 Rising CA-125 (according to the Rustin/GCIG criteria, see appendix 10)) occurring more than 6 months after the last platinum-based chemotherapy cycle (platinum sensitive), I4 No symptom related to ovarian cancer progression, I6 1 or 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy followed either by surveillance or bevacizumab or olaparib (outside therapeutic trial) maintenance, I7 Before randomization, patients must be in CR, PR or SD (RECIST version 1.1) under surveillance or maintenance with bevacizumab or olaparib,

I8 Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal functions as assessed by the following laboratory tests conducted within 7 days before randomization:

* Absolute Neutrophil Count ≥ 1.5 G/L, platelets count ≥ 100 G/L, and hemoglobin ≥ 9g/dL,
* AST/ALT ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) (or ≤ 5.0 x ULN if liver metastasis) and total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x ULN, Alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 x ULN
* Serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 x ULN,
* Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² according to the Modification of Diet Renal Disease (MDRD) abbreviated formula
* Lipase ≤ 1.5 x ULN
* Prothrombine time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR) \< 1.5 x ULN. Patients who are therapeutically anticoagulated with an agent such as warfarin or heparin will be allowed to participate provided that no prior evidence of underlying abnormality in this parameter exists, I9 Women of childbearing potential and partners must agree to use adequate contraceptive method (if no previous bilateral annexectomies) during the whole study period and for up to 6 months after the last dose of study treatment; a negative pregnancy test must be obtained prior to randomization,

Exclusion Criteria

E4 Past or concurrent history of neoplasm other than ovarian cancer, except for in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri, in situ breast cancer and/or basal cell epithelioma. All treats and cures cancer more than 3 years before the study entry is allowed E5 Known history or symptomatic metastatic brain or meningeal tumors (head CT or MRI at screening to confirm the absence of central nervous system (CNS) disease if the patient has symptoms suggestive or consistent with progressive CNS disease), E6 Any prior radiotherapy to the pelvis or abdomen; surgery (including open biopsy) within 4 weeks before starting study drugs (24 hours for minor surgical procedures), or planned major surgery during the study treatment period, E7 Any prior treatment with anti angiogenic agent such as pazopanib, nintedanib or cediranib.

E8 Endocrine therapy administered within 3 years prior to randomization,

E13 History of any of the following :

* abdominal fistula,
* gastrointestinal perforation,
* intra-abdominal abscess,
* any malabsorption condition, E14 Clinically significant bleeding NCI-CTCAE version 4.3 Grade 3 or higher within 30 days before randomization, E15 Congestive heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ class 2, E17 Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure (BP) \> 150 mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 90 mmHg despite optimal medical management), E21 Ongoing infection \> Grade 2 according to NCI-CTCAE version 4.3. Hepatitis B is allowed if no active replication is present. Hepatitis C is allowed if no antiviral treatment is required, E23 Interstitial lung disease with ongoing signs and symptoms at the time of screening,
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

ARCAGY/ GINECO GROUP

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier Olivier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

[email protected]

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Jean Minjoz

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Institut Bergonié

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de Cholet

Cholet, , France

Site Status

Centre Jean Perrin

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dupuytren

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Centre Léon Bérard

Lyon, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de Mont-de-Marsan

Mont-de-Marsan, , France

Site Status

Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie

Mougins, , France

Site Status

ORACLE - Centre d'Oncologie de Gentilly

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Centre Catherine de Sienne

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

Clinique Francheville

Périgueux, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Centre CARIO - HPCA

Plérin, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois

Pringy, , France

Site Status

Institut Jean Godinot

Reims, , France

Site Status

ICO Centre René Gauducheau

Saint-Herblain, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Bretonneau

Tours, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GINECO-OV235

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.