Does Pulmonary Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduces the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxaemia in Bariatric Surgery?

NCT ID: NCT02579798

Last Updated: 2018-01-19

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 100 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2013-07-31
• Study Completion Date: 2016-03-31

Brief Summary

General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.

The functional residual capacity (FRC) of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.

Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.

There is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.

The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio (ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure to fractional inspired oxygen), the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient (arterial and end tidal gradient) between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).

The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.

Detailed Description

General anesthesia, even in patients in good health, impairs gas exchanges and ventilatory mechanics. These effects result primarily from atelectasis formation. They occur in 85-90% of healthy patients in the minutes following the induction when a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) is not used.

These atelectasis are formed on one hand by the reduction of the functional residual capacity (FRC) following a compression mechanism (loss of the inspiratory muscle tone, which is accompanied by a chest wall configuration change and a diaphragm cephalic movement) and on the other hand by a denitrogenation absorption process (ventilation at high Fi02 (oxygen inspired fraction) causing complete absorption of O2 with lack of support for the alveolus, which then collapses).

The FRC of obese patients during general anesthesia is even smaller than the one of healthy patients. There is a direct relationship between the body mass index and the decrease of the functional residual capacity. Obese patients have therefore more atelectasis. The increased abdominal pressure during the pneumoperitoneum will increase the decrease of the CRF, and thus aggravate the formation of these atelectasis.

Atelectasis affect the peroperative gas exchanges and are likely to be involved in the worsening of postoperative hypoxemia episodes. In addition, atelectasis alter the clearance of secretions and the lymph flow, which predispose to lung infections.Taking all these factors into account, it is logical to think that the atelectasis presence can lead to an increase of the postsurgical morbidity (respiratory distress, infections). That is why actively fighting against the formation of these atelectasis is important.

Several strategies have been studied in order to improve respiratory mechanics and reduce impaired gas exchange during laparoscopic surgery in obese patients. The position called "chair", mechanical ventilation with PEEP, recruitment maneuvers followed by the PEEP, and spontaneous ventilation with CPAP before extubation, are all strategies that have proven effective to decrease development these atelectasis.

Currently, the scientific community agrees on the fact that PEEP improves intraoperative respiratory function (improved compliance, oxygenation) especially in conjunction with recruitment maneuvers.

But there is a lack of scientific evidence to say that the strategies against atelectasis as PEEP have a significant impact on the patient's postoperative status. The expected clinical benefits balance (reduction of respiratory distress episodes, infections and mortality) versus the risks linked to the maneuvers done to reduce the development of atelectasis (barotraumas, cardiac complications) remains to be determined.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of two different alveolar recruitment strategies on the incidence of postoperative hypoxemia in obese patients after bariatric surgery.

The secondary objectives of this study are to compare the number of recruitment maneuvers, the Pa02 / FI02 ratio, the dynamic compliance, the anatomic dead space and intraoperative PaCO2-EtCO2 gradient between two alveolar recruitment strategies applied in obese patients during laparoscopic bariatric surgery (gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy).

The tertiary objectives of this study are to report the number of respiratory complications and postoperative wound infections at the 30th postoperative day.

Conditions

Bariatric Surgery

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: PREVENTION
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

PEEP 10 cmH20

In this group, a PEEP of 10 cmH20 is applied for the duration of the intervention and a recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 (oxygen pulsated saturation) drops below 95%.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)

Intervention Type: DEVICE

optimal PEEP

In this group, 10 cmH20 PEEP is applied immediately. Then the "optimal PEEP" is sought at three key moments. It is determined by the best value of lung compliance found in the patient. It is sought by increasing or decreasing the value of the PEEP by increments or decrements of 2 cmH20. If after 6 respiratory cycles, the value of the compliance is increased, the investigator continues to increase the value of the PEEP. On the other hand, if the value of compliance is reduced, the investigator reduces the value of PEEP. The value of the PEEP selected shall in no event exceed the set pressure range (maximum pressure plate of 30 cmH20 and maximum inspiratory peak pressure 40cmH20). A recruitment maneuver is applied each time the SpO2 drops below 95%, as in the PEEP 10cmH2O group.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Interventions

PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure)

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• ASA score (American Society of Anesthesiologists ) of II or III
• BMI > 35 kg/m²
• Elective laparoscopic bariatric surgery: gastric bypass or sleeve

Exclusion Criteria

• Restrictive (CPT <65%) or obstructive (VEMS/CV < 69%) chronic lung disease
• Increase of the intracranial pressure
• History of smoking with chronic obstructive disease (VEMS/CV)
• Active tabagism
• Ongoing pregnancy
• History of heart failure (NYHA III or IV) or coronary artery disease
• Urgent surgery
• Allergy to a drug used within the study
• Lack of written informed consent

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Brugmann University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Philippe VAN DER LINDEN

Head of clinic

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Philippe Van der Linden, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

Van Hecke Delphine, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Brugmann

Locations

CHU Brugmann

Brussels, , Belgium

Countries

Belgium

References

Coussa M, Proietti S, Schnyder P, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Prevention of atelectasis formation during the induction of general anesthesia in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1491-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000111743.61132.99.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15105237 (View on PubMed)

Imberger G, McIlroy D, Pace NL, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Moller AM. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during anaesthesia for the prevention of mortality and postoperative pulmonary complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD007922. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007922.pub2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20824871 (View on PubMed)

Eichenberger A, Proietti S, Wicky S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Morbid obesity and postoperative pulmonary atelectasis: an underestimated problem. Anesth Analg. 2002 Dec;95(6):1788-92, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200212000-00060.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12456460 (View on PubMed)

Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, Joyner MJ, Hubmayr RD, Warner DO, Sprung J. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):298-305. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 16368847 (View on PubMed)

Futier E, Constantin JM, Pelosi P, Chanques G, Kwiatkoskwi F, Jaber S, Bazin JE. Intraoperative recruitment maneuver reverses detrimental pneumoperitoneum-induced respiratory effects in healthy weight and obese patients undergoing laparoscopy. Anesthesiology. 2010 Dec;113(6):1310-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181fc640a.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21068660 (View on PubMed)

Almarakbi WA, Fawzi HM, Alhashemi JA. Effects of four intraoperative ventilatory strategies on respiratory compliance and gas exchange during laparoscopic gastric banding in obese patients. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Jun;102(6):862-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep084. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19403595 (View on PubMed)

Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19809292 (View on PubMed)

Pelosi P, Ravagnan I, Giurati G, Panigada M, Bottino N, Tredici S, Eccher G, Gattinoni L. Positive end-expiratory pressure improves respiratory function in obese but not in normal subjects during anesthesia and paralysis. Anesthesiology. 1999 Nov;91(5):1221-31. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199911000-00011.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10551570 (View on PubMed)

Tusman G, Bohm SH, Suarez-Sipmann F, Turchetto E. Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Aug-Sep;51(7):723-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018433.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15310643 (View on PubMed)

Maisch S, Reissmann H, Fuellekrug B, Weismann D, Rutkowski T, Tusman G, Bohm SH. Compliance and dead space fraction indicate an optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure after recruitment in anesthetized patients. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jan;106(1):175-81, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287684.74505.49.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18165575 (View on PubMed)

Strang CM, Hachenberg T, Freden F, Hedenstierna G. Development of atelectasis and arterial to end-tidal PCO2-difference in a porcine model of pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Aug;103(2):298-303. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep102. Epub 2009 May 13.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19443420 (View on PubMed)

Gander S, Frascarolo P, Suter M, Spahn DR, Magnusson L. Positive end-expiratory pressure during induction of general anesthesia increases duration of nonhypoxic apnea in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2005 Feb;100(2):580-584. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000143339.40385.1B.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15673897 (View on PubMed)

Hans GA, Sottiaux TM, Lamy ML, Joris JL. Ventilatory management during routine general anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Jan;26(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b000e000000f1fb.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19122544 (View on PubMed)

Mercat A, Richard JC, Vielle B, Jaber S, Osman D, Diehl JL, Lefrant JY, Prat G, Richecoeur J, Nieszkowska A, Gervais C, Baudot J, Bouadma L, Brochard L; Expiratory Pressure (Express) Study Group. Positive end-expiratory pressure setting in adults with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):646-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.646.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18270353 (View on PubMed)

Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Brazzi L, Caironi P. Positive end-expiratory pressure. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010 Feb;16(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283354723.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19996966 (View on PubMed)

Van Hecke D, Bidgoli JS, Van der Linden P. Does Lung Compliance Optimization Through PEEP Manipulations Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Hypoxemia in Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery? A Randomized Trial. Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1268-1275. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03662-x.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 30612327 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CHUB-CRF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id