Medial Plica Syndrome of the Knee: Conservative Treatment Versus Arthroscopic Plica Resection - a Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
NCT ID: NCT02578589
Last Updated: 2017-10-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-09-30
2020-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
surgery
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Conservative treatment
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Plica resection vs conservative treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* History of antermedial knee pain
* Palpable medial band in clinical examination or medial plica appearence on MRI
* Absence of all of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome
* Given declaration of consent
* Joining a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of one or more of the following diagnoses: Osteoarthritis, osteochondritis dissecans, meniscal injury, patella subluxation, pes anserinus bursit, patellofemoral pain syndrome
* Prior surgical intervention, infection, fracture or patellar luxation concerning the relevant knee
* Not willing to join a fitness centre for the duration of minimum 3 months at their own expense
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Steffen Sauer
Steffen Sauer, MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Regionshospital Silkeborg
Silkeborg, , Denmark
Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
Silkeborg, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Steffen Sauer
Role: primary
Steffen Sauer
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
280981PM
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id