Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183)/Doxorubicin Versus CAV or Topotecan as Treatment in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NCT NCT02566993)

NCT ID: NCT02566993

Last Updated: 2021-10-28

Results Overview

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

613 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Results posted on

2021-10-28

Participant Flow

The first randomization took place on 30 August 2016 and the first study treatment was administered on 25 October 2016. The cutoff date for results presented in this Clinical Study Report was 24 February 2020. A total of 919 patients were screened; 613 of these 919 patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive any of the study treatments at 135 investigational sites from 20 countries.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV), until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCL) ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Study
STARTED
307
306
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
307
306

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV), until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCL) ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
5
16
Overall Study
Progressive disease
213
152
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
12
28
Overall Study
Death
17
23
Overall Study
Physician Decision
10
17
Overall Study
Study drug-related adverse event
20
41
Overall Study
Non study drug-related adverse event
9
9
Overall Study
Symptomatic deterioration
9
16
Overall Study
End of study due to events required for OS analysis according to study protocol had been reached
9
1
Overall Study
Sponsor's decision after incorrect treatment at site
1
1
Overall Study
Screening failure
2
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
Overall Study
Symptomatic deterioration, progression disease, and a decision by the Investigator
0
1

Baseline Characteristics

Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183)/Doxorubicin Versus CAV or Topotecan as Treatment in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Total
n=613 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
63.0 years
n=5 Participants
63.0 years
n=7 Participants
63 years
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
18-49 years
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
50-65 years
161 Participants
n=5 Participants
166 Participants
n=7 Participants
327 Participants
n=5 Participants
Age, Customized
>65 years
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
257 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
133 Participants
n=7 Participants
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
173 Participants
n=7 Participants
349 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
266 Participants
n=5 Participants
265 Participants
n=7 Participants
531 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not available
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Greece
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
Weight
73.0 Kg
n=5 Participants
74.0 Kg
n=7 Participants
73.4 Kg
n=5 Participants
Height
168 cm
n=5 Participants
168 cm
n=7 Participants
168 cm
n=5 Participants
Body surface area
1.8 m^2
n=5 Participants
1.8 m^2
n=7 Participants
1.8 m^2
n=5 Participants
Body mass index
25.9 Kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
26.0 Kg/m^2
n=7 Participants
25.9 Kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 0
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
95 Participants
n=7 Participants
190 Participants
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 1
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
204 Participants
n=7 Participants
401 Participants
n=5 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 2
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking status
Former
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
199 Participants
n=7 Participants
396 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking status
Current
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
180 Participants
n=5 Participants
Smoking status
Never
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
Time from first diagnosis to randomization
9.3 months
n=5 Participants
9.1 months
n=7 Participants
9.2 months
n=5 Participants
Disease stage
Limited
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
Disease stage
Extensive
282 Participants
n=5 Participants
278 Participants
n=7 Participants
560 Participants
n=5 Participants
Number of sites involved
<3 sites
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
Number of sites involved
≥3 sites
269 Participants
n=5 Participants
275 Participants
n=7 Participants
544 Participants
n=5 Participants
Number of sites involved
4.0 sites
n=5 Participants
4.0 sites
n=7 Participants
4.0 sites
n=5 Participants
Bulky disease
144 Participants
n=5 Participants
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
271 Participants
n=5 Participants
Central Nervous System involvement
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
Paraneoplastic syndrome
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior radiotherapy
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
236 Participants
n=7 Participants
473 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior surgery
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
Lines of anticancer therapy
1.0 lines of therapies
n=5 Participants
1.0 lines of therapies
n=7 Participants
1.0 lines of therapies
n=5 Participants
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Complete response
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Partial response
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
191 Participants
n=7 Participants
383 Participants
n=5 Participants
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Stable disease
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Progressive disease
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Unknown
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
Prior immunotherapy against PD-1 or PD-L1
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
Time-to-progression to prior chemotherapy
7.4 months
n=5 Participants
7.4 months
n=7 Participants
7.4 months
n=5 Participants
Time from last prior progressive disease to randomization
25.0 days
n=5 Participants
25.5 days
n=7 Participants
25.0 days
n=5 Participants
Time from end date of last prior chemotherapy to randomization
157.0 days
n=5 Participants
153.0 days
n=7 Participants
155 days
n=5 Participants
Chemotherapy-free interval
115.0 days
n=5 Participants
120.5 days
n=7 Participants
120 days
n=5 Participants
Chemotherapy-free interval
<90 days
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
200 Participants
n=5 Participants
Chemotherapy-free interval
90-179 days
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
116 Participants
n=7 Participants
231 Participants
n=5 Participants
Chemotherapy-free interval
≥180 days
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
182 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Survival (OS)
8.6 months
Interval 7.1 to 9.4
7.6 months
Interval 6.6 to 8.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 12 months

Population: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin (DOX) and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months
29.6 percentage of participants
Interval 22.8 to 36.3
24.4 percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 31.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 18 months

Population: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/DOX and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 18 Months
13.9 percentage of participants
Interval 8.8 to 19.1
15.9 percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 21.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 24 months

Population: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/DOX and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 24 Months
8.6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.1 to 13.1
8.7 percentage of participants
Interval 4.1 to 13.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee
4.0 months
Interval 2.8 to 4.2
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: At 6 months

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months by Independent Review Committee
31.3 percentage of participants
Interval 25.7 to 36.8
24.4 percentage of participants
Interval 18.9 to 29.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: at 12 months

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival Rate at 12 Months by Independent Review Committee
10.8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.7 to 14.9
4.4 percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 7.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Complete response
8 Participants
4 Participants
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Partial response
89 Participants
87 Participants
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Stable disease
111 Participants
116 Participants
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Progressive disease
74 Participants
52 Participants
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Unknown
25 Participants
47 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Response Rate by Independent Review Committee
31.6 percentage of participants
Interval 26.4 to 37.1
29.7 percentage of participants
Interval 24.7 to 35.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response

Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=97 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=91 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Duration of Response by Independent Review Committee
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 7.1
3.8 months
Interval 2.8 to 4.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
10.3 months
Interval 9.0 to 11.8
8.7 months
Interval 7.8 to 9.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥90 Days
4.8 months
Interval 4.1 to 5.6
4.4 months
Interval 4.0 to 5.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Complete response
8 Participants
4 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Partial response
69 Participants
68 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Stable disease
85 Participants
73 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Progression disease
32 Participants
35 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Unknown
14 Participants
25 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
37.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 44.0
35.1 percentage of participants
Interval 28.6 to 42.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy.

Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=77 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=72 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Duration of Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
6.9 months
Interval 4.1 to 8.3
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval < 90 Days
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 6.7
5.3 months
Interval 4.2 to 6.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
1.6 months
Interval 1.4 to 2.7
2.8 months
Interval 2.5 to 3.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Partial response
20 Participants
19 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Stable disease
26 Participants
43 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Progression disease
42 Participants
17 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Unknown
11 Participants
22 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy

Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
20.2 percentage of participants
Interval 12.8 to 29.5
18.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.7 to 27.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy.

Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=20 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=19 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Duration of Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
3.0 months
Interval 1.4 to 4.5
2.8 months
Interval 1.4 to 4.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Survival in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
9.1 months
Interval 8.1 to 10.2
7.7 months
Interval 6.7 to 8.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
4.2 months
Interval 3.7 to 4.8
4.1 months
Interval 3.1 to 4.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Complete response
7 Participants
3 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Partial response
79 Participants
76 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Stable disease
101 Participants
100 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression disease
55 Participants
40 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Unknown
19 Participants
38 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Response Rate in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
33.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.3 to 39.0
30.7 percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 36.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=86 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=79 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Duration of Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 7.3
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
4.6 months
Interval 3.1 to 6.1
6.6 months
Interval 4.0 to 8.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
1.9 months
Interval 1.4 to 2.7
2.8 months
Interval 1.4 to 3.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Complete response
1 Participants
1 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Partial response
10 Participants
11 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Stable disease
10 Participants
16 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression disease
19 Participants
12 Participants
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Unknown
6 Participants
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
23.9 percentage of participants
Interval 12.6 to 38.8
24.5 percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 38.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years

Population: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline

Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=11 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=12 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min. or CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Duration of Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
1.5 months
Interval 0.1 to
Not reached
2.7 months
Interval 1.3 to 4.0

Adverse Events

Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin

Serious events: 126 serious events
Other events: 292 other events
Deaths: 264 deaths

Topotecan

Serious events: 66 serious events
Other events: 120 other events
Deaths: 100 deaths

Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine

Serious events: 75 serious events
Other events: 148 other events
Deaths: 148 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=303 participants at risk
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan
n=121 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=168 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg FD. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
4.0%
12/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.1%
17/168 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.4%
9/121 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 18 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
3.0%
9/303 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
12.4%
15/121 • Number of events 33 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Endocrine disorders
Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Eye disorders
Optic atrophy
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal motility disorder
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired gastric emptying
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric perforation
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Neutropenic colitis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Complication associated with device
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Face oedema
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Fatigue
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.0%
5/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Infusion site extravasation
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Oedema
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Pain
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Bronchiolitis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.6%
6/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
4.6%
14/303 • Number of events 18 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic infection
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic sepsis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.8%
3/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation pneumonitis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.8%
3/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Infected neoplasm
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to meninges
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour pain
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Altered state of consciousness
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Depressed level of consciousness
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Post herpetic neuralgia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Central pain syndrome
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Neurological decompensation
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Renal and urinary disorders
Anuria
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mediastinal disorder
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infiltration
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery thrombosis
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=303 participants at risk
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL. The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
Topotecan
n=121 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses: * 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min. * 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min. * 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=168 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option. CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses: * Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2, * Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2, * Vincristine: 2.0 mg FD. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
39.9%
121/303 • Number of events 341 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
69.4%
84/121 • Number of events 283 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
53.0%
89/168 • Number of events 250 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 106 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
26.4%
32/121 • Number of events 77 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
27.4%
46/168 • Number of events 123 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 51 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 21 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 61 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
33.3%
101/303 • Number of events 316 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
61.2%
74/121 • Number of events 173 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
63.7%
107/168 • Number of events 251 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
23.1%
70/303 • Number of events 246 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
58.7%
71/121 • Number of events 251 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
36.3%
61/168 • Number of events 155 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
4.6%
14/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
9.9%
12/121 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
19.5%
59/303 • Number of events 90 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
24.8%
30/121 • Number of events 45 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
14.9%
25/168 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
14.2%
43/303 • Number of events 65 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
20.7%
25/121 • Number of events 30 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
13.7%
23/168 • Number of events 29 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
40.6%
123/303 • Number of events 219 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
27.3%
33/121 • Number of events 42 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
32.7%
55/168 • Number of events 76 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
23.8%
72/303 • Number of events 125 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
12.4%
15/121 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
19.6%
33/168 • Number of events 36 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Fatigue
54.1%
164/303 • Number of events 365 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
52.9%
64/121 • Number of events 162 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
47.0%
79/168 • Number of events 152 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
9.9%
30/303 • Number of events 50 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
8.3%
14/168 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
8.6%
26/303 • Number of events 27 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Oedema
6.9%
21/303 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
Pyrexia
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 32 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
9.9%
12/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
12.5%
21/168 • Number of events 28 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
5.9%
18/303 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 15 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.5%
11/168 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
6.3%
19/303 • Number of events 26 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.0%
5/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.0%
6/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
5.3%
16/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Investigations
Weight decreased
21.1%
64/303 • Number of events 79 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
11.6%
14/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
14.3%
24/168 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
28.1%
85/303 • Number of events 129 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
16.5%
20/121 • Number of events 27 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
23.8%
40/168 • Number of events 61 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
8.3%
25/303 • Number of events 41 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
5.9%
18/303 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
8.3%
14/168 • Number of events 20 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
7.9%
24/303 • Number of events 29 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
12.2%
37/303 • Number of events 49 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
11.9%
20/168 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 15 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
9.9%
30/303 • Number of events 33 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
11.3%
19/168 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.6%
8/121 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
19.8%
60/303 • Number of events 80 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
19.0%
23/121 • Number of events 28 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
15.5%
26/168 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
17.2%
52/303 • Number of events 63 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
19.8%
24/121 • Number of events 26 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
14.3%
24/168 • Number of events 30 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
11.2%
34/303 • Number of events 40 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.4%
9/121 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
16.1%
27/168 • Number of events 36 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
6.3%
19/303 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
2.0%
6/303 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Candida infection
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.5%
11/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.6%
6/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
3.0%
9/303 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
6.6%
8/121 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.

Additional Information

Clinical Developtment, Department of PharmaMar´s Oncology., Business Unit.

Pharma Mar S.A.

Phone: 0034 918466000

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER