Trial Outcomes & Findings for Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183)/Doxorubicin Versus CAV or Topotecan as Treatment in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NCT NCT02566993)
NCT ID: NCT02566993
Last Updated: 2021-10-28
Results Overview
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
COMPLETED
PHASE3
613 participants
Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 years
2021-10-28
Participant Flow
The first randomization took place on 30 August 2016 and the first study treatment was administered on 25 October 2016. The cutoff date for results presented in this Clinical Study Report was 24 February 2020. A total of 919 patients were screened; 613 of these 919 patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive any of the study treatments at 135 investigational sites from 20 countries.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV), until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCL) ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
307
|
306
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
307
|
306
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV), until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCL) ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
|
5
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
Progressive disease
|
213
|
152
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
12
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
17
|
23
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
10
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
Study drug-related adverse event
|
20
|
41
|
|
Overall Study
Non study drug-related adverse event
|
9
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
Symptomatic deterioration
|
9
|
16
|
|
Overall Study
End of study due to events required for OS analysis according to study protocol had been reached
|
9
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor's decision after incorrect treatment at site
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Screening failure
|
2
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Symptomatic deterioration, progression disease, and a decision by the Investigator
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Clinical Trial of Lurbinectedin (PM01183)/Doxorubicin Versus CAV or Topotecan as Treatment in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
Total
n=613 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.0 years
n=5 Participants
|
63.0 years
n=7 Participants
|
63 years
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
18-49 years
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
50-65 years
|
161 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
166 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
327 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Age, Customized
>65 years
|
130 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
257 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
131 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
133 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
264 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
176 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
173 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
349 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
|
266 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
265 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
531 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not available
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
75 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Romania
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Portugal
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
62 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Greece
|
12 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Lebanon
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Austria
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
7 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Italy
|
21 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
|
5 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
France
|
11 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
67 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Weight
|
73.0 Kg
n=5 Participants
|
74.0 Kg
n=7 Participants
|
73.4 Kg
n=5 Participants
|
|
Height
|
168 cm
n=5 Participants
|
168 cm
n=7 Participants
|
168 cm
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body surface area
|
1.8 m^2
n=5 Participants
|
1.8 m^2
n=7 Participants
|
1.8 m^2
n=5 Participants
|
|
Body mass index
|
25.9 Kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
|
26.0 Kg/m^2
n=7 Participants
|
25.9 Kg/m^2
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 0
|
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
190 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 1
|
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
204 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
401 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status
PS 2
|
15 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking status
Former
|
197 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
199 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
396 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking status
Current
|
91 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
180 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Smoking status
Never
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from first diagnosis to randomization
|
9.3 months
n=5 Participants
|
9.1 months
n=7 Participants
|
9.2 months
n=5 Participants
|
|
Disease stage
Limited
|
25 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
28 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
53 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Disease stage
Extensive
|
282 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
278 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
560 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of sites involved
<3 sites
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
31 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
69 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of sites involved
≥3 sites
|
269 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
275 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
544 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Number of sites involved
|
4.0 sites
n=5 Participants
|
4.0 sites
n=7 Participants
|
4.0 sites
n=5 Participants
|
|
Bulky disease
|
144 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
127 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
271 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Central Nervous System involvement
|
46 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Paraneoplastic syndrome
|
9 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
11 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior radiotherapy
|
237 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
236 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
473 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior surgery
|
27 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
66 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Lines of anticancer therapy
|
1.0 lines of therapies
n=5 Participants
|
1.0 lines of therapies
n=7 Participants
|
1.0 lines of therapies
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Complete response
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Partial response
|
192 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
191 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
383 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Stable disease
|
71 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
134 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Progressive disease
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
38 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Best response to last prior chemotherapy
Unknown
|
10 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Prior immunotherapy against PD-1 or PD-L1
|
19 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time-to-progression to prior chemotherapy
|
7.4 months
n=5 Participants
|
7.4 months
n=7 Participants
|
7.4 months
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from last prior progressive disease to randomization
|
25.0 days
n=5 Participants
|
25.5 days
n=7 Participants
|
25.0 days
n=5 Participants
|
|
Time from end date of last prior chemotherapy to randomization
|
157.0 days
n=5 Participants
|
153.0 days
n=7 Participants
|
155 days
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy-free interval
|
115.0 days
n=5 Participants
|
120.5 days
n=7 Participants
|
120 days
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy-free interval
<90 days
|
99 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
101 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
200 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy-free interval
90-179 days
|
115 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
116 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
231 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Chemotherapy-free interval
≥180 days
|
93 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
89 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
182 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsOverall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
|
8.6 months
Interval 7.1 to 9.4
|
7.6 months
Interval 6.6 to 8.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 12 monthsPopulation: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin (DOX) and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 12 Months
|
29.6 percentage of participants
Interval 22.8 to 36.3
|
24.4 percentage of participants
Interval 17.9 to 31.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 18 monthsPopulation: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/DOX and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 18 Months
|
13.9 percentage of participants
Interval 8.8 to 19.1
|
15.9 percentage of participants
Interval 10.3 to 21.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 24 monthsPopulation: Patients with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Vincristine (CAV) as best Investigator's choice
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=184 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=179 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Difference in Overall Survival Between Lurbinectedin/DOX and CAV in Patients With CAV as Best Investigator's Choice: Overall Survival Rate at 24 Months
|
8.6 percentage of participants
Interval 4.1 to 13.1
|
8.7 percentage of participants
Interval 4.1 to 13.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsProgression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee
|
4.0 months
Interval 2.8 to 4.2
|
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 6 monthsProgression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival Rate at 6 Months by Independent Review Committee
|
31.3 percentage of participants
Interval 25.7 to 36.8
|
24.4 percentage of participants
Interval 18.9 to 29.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: at 12 monthsProgression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival Rate at 12 Months by Independent Review Committee
|
10.8 percentage of participants
Interval 6.7 to 14.9
|
4.4 percentage of participants
Interval 1.4 to 7.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsBest antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Complete response
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Partial response
|
89 Participants
|
87 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Stable disease
|
111 Participants
|
116 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Progressive disease
|
74 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response by Independent Review Committee
Unknown
|
25 Participants
|
47 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsOverall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=307 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=306 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate by Independent Review Committee
|
31.6 percentage of participants
Interval 26.4 to 37.1
|
29.7 percentage of participants
Interval 24.7 to 35.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response
Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=97 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=91 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response by Independent Review Committee
|
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 7.1
|
3.8 months
Interval 2.8 to 4.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
|
10.3 months
Interval 9.0 to 11.8
|
8.7 months
Interval 7.8 to 9.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥90 Days
|
4.8 months
Interval 4.1 to 5.6
|
4.4 months
Interval 4.0 to 5.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Complete response
|
8 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Partial response
|
69 Participants
|
68 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Stable disease
|
85 Participants
|
73 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Progression disease
|
32 Participants
|
35 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
Unknown
|
14 Participants
|
25 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=208 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=205 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
|
37.0 percentage of participants
Interval 30.4 to 44.0
|
35.1 percentage of participants
Interval 28.6 to 42.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval ≥90 days after first-line chemotherapy.
Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=77 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=72 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval ≥ 90 Days
|
6.9 months
Interval 4.1 to 8.3
|
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval < 90 Days
|
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 6.7
|
5.3 months
Interval 4.2 to 6.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
|
1.6 months
Interval 1.4 to 2.7
|
2.8 months
Interval 2.5 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Partial response
|
20 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Stable disease
|
26 Participants
|
43 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Progression disease
|
42 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
Unknown
|
11 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy
Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=99 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=101 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
|
20.2 percentage of participants
Interval 12.8 to 29.5
|
18.8 percentage of participants
Interval 11.7 to 27.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients had chemotherapy-free interval \<90 days after first-line chemotherapy.
Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=20 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=19 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response in Patients With Chemotherapy-free Interval <90 Days
|
3.0 months
Interval 1.4 to 4.5
|
2.8 months
Interval 1.4 to 4.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
9.1 months
Interval 8.1 to 10.2
|
7.7 months
Interval 6.7 to 8.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
4.2 months
Interval 3.7 to 4.8
|
4.1 months
Interval 3.1 to 4.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Complete response
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Partial response
|
79 Participants
|
76 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Stable disease
|
101 Participants
|
100 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression disease
|
55 Participants
|
40 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Unknown
|
19 Participants
|
38 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=261 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=257 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
33.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.3 to 39.0
|
30.7 percentage of participants
Interval 25.2 to 36.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=86 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=79 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response in Patients Without Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
5.7 months
Interval 4.1 to 7.3
|
4.0 months
Interval 3.0 to 4.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Overall survival (OS) will be calculated from the date of randomization to the date of death (death event) or last contact(in this case, survival will be censored on that date).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
4.6 months
Interval 3.1 to 6.1
|
6.6 months
Interval 4.0 to 8.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every six weeks up to progression disease, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression-free survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documented progression per RECIST v.1.1 or death (regardless of the cause of death). If the patient receives further antitumor therapy or is lost to follow-up before PD, PFS will be censored at the date of last tumor assessment before the date of subsequent antitumor therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Progression-free Survival in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
1.9 months
Interval 1.4 to 2.7
|
2.8 months
Interval 1.4 to 3.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Complete response
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Partial response
|
10 Participants
|
11 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Stable disease
|
10 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Progression disease
|
19 Participants
|
12 Participants
|
|
Best Antitumor Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Unknown
|
6 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Overall response rate is defined as the proportion of patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=46 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=49 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
23.9 percentage of participants
Interval 12.6 to 38.8
|
24.5 percentage of participants
Interval 13.3 to 38.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Every three months up to death or study termination, a period of approximately 3.5 yearsPopulation: Patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. A preplanned exploratory efficacy subgroup analysis was focused on patients with Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
Duration of Response is defined as the time that patients who have a partial or complete response in the best antitumor response. The best antitumor response will be the best response obtained in any evaluation according to RECIST v.1.1. CR, complete response: disappearance of all lesions; PD, disease progression: ≥10% increase in target lesion size and does not meet tumor density criteria of PR density; PR, partial response: ≥10% decrease in target lesion size or ≥15% decrease in tumor density; SD, stable disease: none of the CR, PR, or PD criteria met; UK,unknown
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=11 Participants
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=12 Participants
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
or
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg flat dose (FD). The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response in Patients With Central Nervous System Involvement at Baseline
|
1.5 months
Interval 0.1 to
Not reached
|
2.7 months
Interval 1.3 to 4.0
|
Adverse Events
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
Topotecan
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=303 participants at risk
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan
n=121 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
|
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=168 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg FD. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
4.0%
12/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.1%
17/168 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.4%
9/121 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 18 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.0%
9/303 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
12.4%
15/121 • Number of events 33 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopenia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina pectoris
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus tachycardia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Bradycardia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericarditis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Eye disorders
Optic atrophy
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal motility disorder
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Impaired gastric emptying
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric perforation
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Neutropenic colitis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophagitis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Complication associated with device
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Face oedema
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.0%
5/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site extravasation
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchiolitis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.6%
6/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
4.6%
14/303 • Number of events 18 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic infection
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic sepsis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.8%
3/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pneumothorax
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation pneumonitis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
C-reactive protein increased
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercalcaemia
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
2.3%
7/303 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.8%
3/168 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalaemia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypomagnesaemia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Infected neoplasm
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to meninges
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour pain
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Altered state of consciousness
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Depressed level of consciousness
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Post herpetic neuralgia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sciatica
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Central pain syndrome
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemiparesis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.2%
2/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurological decompensation
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Anuria
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Prostatitis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory failure
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Haemoptysis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hypoxia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Mediastinal disorder
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
1.3%
4/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
1.7%
5/303 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung infiltration
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral artery thrombosis
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
|
0.66%
2/303 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.83%
1/121 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.60%
1/168 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/303 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
1.7%
2/121 • Number of events 2 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.33%
1/303 • Number of events 1 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/168 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Lurbinectedin/Doxorubicin
n=303 participants at risk
Doxorubicin: 40.0 mg/m2 i.v. on Day 1 through peripheral or central lines (according to local label), followed by, Lurbinectedin: 2.0 mg/m2 i.v. as a 1-hour infusion on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines. A minimum volume of 100 mL diluted in 5% glucose or 0.9% sodium chloride solution for infusion, had to be used for administration through a central venous catheter; if a peripheral venous catheter was used, the minimum volume was 250 mL.
The combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles.
|
Topotecan
n=121 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
Topotecan: i.v. daily on Days 1-5 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines (according to local label) at the following doses:
* 1.50 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL ≥60 mL/min.
* 1.25 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 40 and 59 mL/min.
* 0.75 mg/m2 daily, for patients with calculated CrCL between 30 and 39 mL/min.
|
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/Vincristine
n=168 participants at risk
If the patient was randomized to the Control Arm, the assigned treatment was based on the reported Investigator's preference between topotecan and CAV, until the first of these options had reached 55% of the target patient enrollment in this arm. Once this had occurred, patients in the Control Arm were to receive the other option.
CAV: i.v. on Day 1 q3wk (three weeks ±48h = one treatment cycle) through peripheral or central lines at the following doses:
* Cyclophosphamide: 1000 mg/m2,
* Doxorubicin: 45.0 mg/m2,
* Vincristine: 2.0 mg FD. The triple combination was to be administered for up to a maximum of ten cycles
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
39.9%
121/303 • Number of events 341 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
69.4%
84/121 • Number of events 283 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
53.0%
89/168 • Number of events 250 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 106 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
26.4%
32/121 • Number of events 77 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
27.4%
46/168 • Number of events 123 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 51 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 21 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 61 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
33.3%
101/303 • Number of events 316 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
61.2%
74/121 • Number of events 173 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
63.7%
107/168 • Number of events 251 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
23.1%
70/303 • Number of events 246 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
58.7%
71/121 • Number of events 251 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
36.3%
61/168 • Number of events 155 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
4.6%
14/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
9.9%
12/121 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
19.5%
59/303 • Number of events 90 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
24.8%
30/121 • Number of events 45 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
14.9%
25/168 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
14.2%
43/303 • Number of events 65 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
20.7%
25/121 • Number of events 30 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
13.7%
23/168 • Number of events 29 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
40.6%
123/303 • Number of events 219 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
27.3%
33/121 • Number of events 42 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
32.7%
55/168 • Number of events 76 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
23.8%
72/303 • Number of events 125 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
12.4%
15/121 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
19.6%
33/168 • Number of events 36 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
54.1%
164/303 • Number of events 365 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
52.9%
64/121 • Number of events 162 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
47.0%
79/168 • Number of events 152 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
9.9%
30/303 • Number of events 50 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
8.3%
14/168 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Non-cardiac chest pain
|
8.6%
26/303 • Number of events 27 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 16 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
6.9%
21/303 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 32 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
9.9%
12/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
12.5%
21/168 • Number of events 28 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
5.9%
18/303 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 15 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.5%
11/168 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
6.3%
19/303 • Number of events 26 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.0%
5/168 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.0%
6/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
|
5.3%
16/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
0.00%
0/121 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
21.1%
64/303 • Number of events 79 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
11.6%
14/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
14.3%
24/168 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
28.1%
85/303 • Number of events 129 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
16.5%
20/121 • Number of events 27 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
23.8%
40/168 • Number of events 61 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
8.3%
25/303 • Number of events 41 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.1%
12/168 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
5.9%
18/303 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
8.3%
14/168 • Number of events 20 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
7.9%
24/303 • Number of events 29 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 6 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
12.2%
37/303 • Number of events 49 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
11.9%
20/168 • Number of events 24 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
9.2%
28/303 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
8.3%
10/121 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 15 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
9.9%
30/303 • Number of events 33 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
10.7%
13/121 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
11.3%
19/168 • Number of events 19 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 13 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.6%
8/121 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.2%
7/168 • Number of events 8 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
19.8%
60/303 • Number of events 80 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
19.0%
23/121 • Number of events 28 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
15.5%
26/168 • Number of events 31 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
17.2%
52/303 • Number of events 63 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
19.8%
24/121 • Number of events 26 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
14.3%
24/168 • Number of events 30 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
11.2%
34/303 • Number of events 40 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.4%
9/121 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
16.1%
27/168 • Number of events 36 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
6.3%
19/303 • Number of events 25 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
7.7%
13/168 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
2.0%
6/303 • Number of events 7 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Candida infection
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.5%
11/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
5.0%
15/303 • Number of events 17 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.5%
3/121 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 11 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
3.3%
10/303 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.8%
7/121 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.6%
6/168 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
4.3%
13/303 • Number of events 14 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
4.1%
5/121 • Number of events 5 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
5.4%
9/168 • Number of events 12 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
3.0%
9/303 • Number of events 9 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
3.3%
4/121 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.0%
10/168 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.99%
3/303 • Number of events 3 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
6.6%
8/121 • Number of events 10 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
2.4%
4/168 • Number of events 4 • Patients were assessed through study completion, approximately 2 years
21 of 613 randomized patients did not receive the study treatment. Safety population consisted of 592 treated patients. 302 had been randomized to lurbinectedin/DOX and 290 to topotecan or CAV. However, one patient randomized to receive topotecan was treated with lurbinectedin/DOX instead. For safety data analysis, this patient has been moved to the lurbinectedin/DOX Arm, and the safety population thereby comprised 303 patients with lurbinectedin/DOX and 289 patients with topotecan or CAV.
|
Additional Information
Clinical Developtment, Department of PharmaMar´s Oncology., Business Unit.
Pharma Mar S.A.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER