Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Efficacy and Safety Study of Infliximab Dose Escalation in Pediatric Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease (NCT NCT02566889)
NCT ID: NCT02566889
Last Updated: 2025-02-04
Results Overview
Clinical response was defined as Crohn's disease (CD) participants with decrease from baseline in PCDAI of greater than or equal to (\>=) 15 points with total score of less than or equal to (\<=) 30 points. PCDAI includes three history items (abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, general wellbeing), five physical examination items (abdominal examination, perirectal disease, extraintestinal manifestations, weight, height), and three laboratory tests (hematocrit, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Items are scored on a three-point scale (zero, 5, or 10 points) except for hematocrit and erythrocyte sedimentation rate which are scored as zero, 2.5 or 5 points. PCDAI scores can range from zero to 125 with higher scores indicating more active disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for Dose escalation (DE) group only.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
53 participants
Week 16
2025-02-04
Participant Flow
Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Reference Group
Participants received infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks (q8wk) up to 56 weeks with a final safety visit at Week 64. Those who lost clinical response during participation in the study were eligible to cross over to the Dose Escalation Group and receive a total of 56 weeks of therapy with infliximab, which included duration of therapy while in the Reference Group prior to dose escalation.
|
Dose Escalation Group
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
45
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Cross-over to Dose Escalation Group
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
32
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
13
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Reference Group
Participants received infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks (q8wk) up to 56 weeks with a final safety visit at Week 64. Those who lost clinical response during participation in the study were eligible to cross over to the Dose Escalation Group and receive a total of 56 weeks of therapy with infliximab, which included duration of therapy while in the Reference Group prior to dose escalation.
|
Dose Escalation Group
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
3
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Other
|
6
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Efficacy and Safety Study of Infliximab Dose Escalation in Pediatric Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Reference Group
n=45 Participants
Participants received infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks (q8wk) up to 56 weeks with a final safety visit at Week 64. Those who lost clinical response during participation in the study were eligible to cross over to the Dose Escalation Group and receive a total of 56 weeks of therapy with infliximab, which included duration of therapy while in the Reference Group prior to dose escalation.
|
Dose Escalation Group
n=8 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
Total
n=53 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
14.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9 • n=5 Participants
|
12.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7 • n=7 Participants
|
13.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.05 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
29 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
33 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
37 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
44 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Canada
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
49 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint
Clinical response was defined as Crohn's disease (CD) participants with decrease from baseline in PCDAI of greater than or equal to (\>=) 15 points with total score of less than or equal to (\<=) 30 points. PCDAI includes three history items (abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, general wellbeing), five physical examination items (abdominal examination, perirectal disease, extraintestinal manifestations, weight, height), and three laboratory tests (hematocrit, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Items are scored on a three-point scale (zero, 5, or 10 points) except for hematocrit and erythrocyte sedimentation rate which are scored as zero, 2.5 or 5 points. PCDAI scores can range from zero to 125 with higher scores indicating more active disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for Dose escalation (DE) group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=5 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Response at Week 16 After Dose Escalation as Evaluated by Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) in Crohn's Disease (CD) Participants
|
4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint
Clinical Response as per Mayo score was defined as decrease from baseline in partial Mayo score of \>= 2 points and \>= 30 percent (%) and decrease in rectal bleeding sub-score by \>= 1 point or achievement of an absolute sub-score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1 point (for UC participants). A Partial Mayo Score which is Mayo score without endoscopy ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and physician's global assessment \[PGA\]) with each ranging from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=1 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Clinical Response at Week 16 After Dose Escalation as Evaluated by Mayo Score in Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint.
Sustained clinical response at Week 56 was defined as achieving clinical response per the primary OM definitions at Week 16 and maintaining clinical response at 1 year after dose escalation (Week 56). Clinical response was defined as a decrease from baseline in PCDAI of \>= 15 points with total score of =\< 30 points (for CD participants) and a decrease from baseline in partial Mayo score of \>=2 points and \>=30% and a decrease in rectal bleeding sub-score by \>= 1 point or achievement of an absolute sub-score of =\< point (for UC participants). Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=4 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Sustained Clinical Response Through 56 Weeks After Dose Escalation
|
2 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 56Population: As the study was terminated early with lesser participants and lesser sample size, data for this OM was not collected.
Abdominal and loose/watery stool frequency was evaluated by using the relevant sub-scores of the PCDAI. PCDAI includes three history items (abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, general wellbeing), five physical examination items (abdominal examination, perirectal disease, extraintestinal manifestations, weight, height), and three laboratory tests (hematocrit, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Items are scored on a three-point scale (zero, 5, or 10 points) except for hematocrit and erythrocyte sedimentation rate which are scored as zero, 2.5 or 5 points. PCDAI scores can range from zero to 125 with higher scores indicating more active disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint.
Change from baseline in abdominal pain using the Wong-Baker FACES scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD participants was reported. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale is a pain scale that combines pictures and numbers to allow pain to be rated by children over the age of 3. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, "No hurt" to a crying face at 10 "Hurts worst". The participant must choose the face that best describes how they are feeling. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=5 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 1: Change at Week 16
|
0 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 1: Change at Week 56
|
0 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 2: Change at Week 16
|
0 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 2: Change at Week 56
|
NA Score on a scale
Here 'NA' signified that the data at week 56 was not collected and analyzed for this participant as study was terminated early because of lesser participants and sample size.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 3: Change at Week 16
|
0 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 3: Change at Week 56
|
NA Score on a scale
Here 'NA' signified that the data at week 56 was not collected and analyzed for this participant as study was terminated early because of lesser participants and sample size.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 4: Change at Week 16
|
1 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 4: Change at Week 56
|
-4 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 5: Change at Week 16
|
-5 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 5: Change at Week 56
|
-5 Score on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint.
Change from baseline in Absolute stool frequency at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD participants were reported. PCDAI includes three history items (abdominal pain, number of liquid stools, general wellbeing), five physical examination items (abdominal examination, perirectal disease, extraintestinal manifestations, weight, height), and three laboratory tests (hematocrit, albumin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate). Items are scored on a three-point scale (zero, 5, or 10 points) except for hematocrit and erythrocyte sedimentation rate which are scored as zero, 2.5 or 5 points. PCDAI scores can range from zero to 125 with higher scores indicating more active disease. An absolute stool frequency subscore of =\<1 point was indicative of mild disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=5 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 2: Change at Week 16
|
2 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 1: Change at Week 16
|
-9 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 1: Change at Week 56
|
-3 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 2: Change at Week 56
|
NA Score on a scale
Here 'NA' signified that the data at week 56 was not collected and analyzed for this participant as study was terminated early because of lesser participants and sample size.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 3: Change at Week 16
|
-1 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 3:Change at Week 56
|
NA Score on a scale
Here 'NA' signified that the data at week 56 was not collected and analyzed for this participant as study was terminated early because of lesser participants and sample size.
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 4: Change at Week 16
|
-2 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 4: Change at Week 56
|
-1 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 5: Change at Week 16
|
1 Score on a scale
|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency Based on PCDAI Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in CD Participants
Participant 5: Change at Week 56
|
1 Score on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in Stool frequency sub-score of the partial Mayo score at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC participants were reported. A Partial Mayo Score which is Mayo score without endoscopy ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA) with each ranging from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). An absolute stool frequency subscore of \<=1 point was indicative of mild disease. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=1 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Stool Frequency Sub-Score of the Partial Mayo Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC Participants
Change at Week 16
|
-2 Score on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 and Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in rectal bleeding sub-scores of the partial Mayo score at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC participants were reported. A Partial Mayo Score which is Mayo score without endoscopy ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 9 (severe disease) and calculated as the sum of 3 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding and PGA) with each ranging from 0 to 3 (0=normal, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). An absolute rectal bleeding subscore of \<=1 point was indicative of mild disease. Higher scores indicate more severe disease. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=1 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Rectal Bleeding Sub-Scores of the Partial Mayo Score at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC Participants
Change at Week 16
|
0 Score on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 And Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in Abdominal pain using the Wong-Baker FACES scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC participants were reported. The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale is a pain scale that combines pictures and numbers to allow pain to be rated by children over the age of 3. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, "No hurt" to a crying face at 10 "Hurts worst". The participant must choose the face that best describes how they are feeling. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=1 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Abdominal Pain Using the Wong-Baker FACES Scale at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC Participants
Change at Week 16
|
-4 Score on scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 16 And Week 56Population: Analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies the number of participants for whom data was available for this endpoint and 'n' (number analyzed) signifies number of participants analyzed at specified timepoints.
Change from baseline in absolute stool frequency at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC participants were reported. Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Dose Escalation Group
n=1 Participants
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Absolute Stool Frequency at Week 16 and Week 56 in UC Participants
Change at Week 16
|
-6 Score on a scale
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16Population: As the study was terminated early with lesser participants and lesser sample size, data for this OM was not collected.
The Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale is a pain scale that combines pictures and numbers to allow pain to be rated by children over the age of 3. The scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, "No hurt" to a crying face at 10 "Hurts worst". Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only. Statistical test of the hypothesis (regression model) was not performed due to insufficient data being collected to permit analysis.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 16 and 56Population: As the study was terminated early with lesser participants and lesser sample size, data for this OM was not collected.
PCDAI is validated clinical tool used to assess disease severity in pediatric CD participants. PCDAI collects information on disease-related variables:Total number of liquid stools, abdominal pain, and general well-being (scored by participants or participant's legal representative);Extra-intestinal manifestations;Physical examinations of abdominal mass, perirectal disease;Weight change, height change or, height velocity;Hematocrit;erythrocyte sedimentation rate; albumin. PCDAI score is calculated as sum of individual component scores and ranges from 0-100 points. Wong-Baker FACES Pain Scale combines pictures and numbers to allow pain to be rated by children over age of 3. Scale shows a series of faces ranging from a happy face at 0, "No hurt" to crying face at 10 "Hurts worst". Data for this OM was planned to be analyzed for the DE group only. Statistical test of the hypothesis (regression model) was not performed due to insufficient data being collected to permit analysis.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Reference Group
Dose Escalation Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Reference Group
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks (q8wk) up to 56 weeks with a final safety visit at Week 64. Those who lost clinical response during participation in the study were eligible to cross over to the Dose Escalation Group and receive a total of 56 weeks of therapy with infliximab, which included duration of therapy while in the Reference Group prior to dose escalation.
|
Dose Escalation Group
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis Ulcerative
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis Viral
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis Streptococcal
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Reference Group
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received infliximab 5 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion every 8 weeks (q8wk) up to 56 weeks with a final safety visit at Week 64. Those who lost clinical response during participation in the study were eligible to cross over to the Dose Escalation Group and receive a total of 56 weeks of therapy with infliximab, which included duration of therapy while in the Reference Group prior to dose escalation.
|
Dose Escalation Group
n=9 participants at risk
Participants received infliximab 10 mg/kg IV infusion q8wk from Week 0 to 56 with a final safety visit at Week 64.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain Upper
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anorectal Disorder
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis Ulcerative
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Epigastric Discomfort
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Faeces Soft
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematochezia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lip Swelling
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth Haemorrhage
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue Erythema
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth Disorder
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth Impacted
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Discomfort
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
General disorders
Chest Pain
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Allergy to Arthropod Bite
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Food Allergy
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Adenovirus Infection
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium Difficile Infection
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear Infection
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eczema Infected
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Epstein-Barr Virus Infection
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Eye Infection
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gingivitis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
22.2%
2/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
11.1%
5/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis Media
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis Streptococcal
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal Impetigo
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Infection
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Animal Bite
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burns Second Degree
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint Dislocation
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint Injury
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ligament Sprain
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb Injury
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lip Injury
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Soft Tissue Injury
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
C-Reactive Protein Increased
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Faecal Calprotectin Increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Heart Rate Irregular
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic Enzyme Increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Transaminases Increased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
Vitamin D Decreased
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Investigations
White Blood Cell Count Increased
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased Appetite
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Vitamin D Deficiency
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
8.9%
4/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back Pain
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Costochondritis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremity
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Synovial Cyst
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Torticollis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin Papilloma
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness Postural
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
13.3%
6/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hemianopia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Lethargy
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Syncope
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian Cyst
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma Exercise Induced
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea Exertional
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Congestion
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
|
6.7%
3/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory Tract Congestion
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillolith
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne Cystic
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Blister
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry Skin
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
4.4%
2/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Warm
|
0.00%
0/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Orthostatic Hypertension
|
2.2%
1/45 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
0.00%
0/9 • Up to Week 64
The safety analysis population included all participants who received at least one infusion of infliximab after enrollment. Reference arm was planned only for safety analysis in participants being treated with labeled dosing of infliximab. One participants who had crossed-over from reference group to Dose escalation group was counted in both arms and safety is presented accordingly.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If an investigator wishes to publish information from the study, a copy of the manuscript must be provided to the sponsor for review at least 60 days before submission for publication or presentation. If requested by the sponsor in writing, the investigator will withhold such publication for up to an additional 60 days.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER