Indocyanine Green Versus Blue Dye for Detection of Sentinel Lymph Node In Endometrial Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02564276

Last Updated: 2018-01-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

132 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-02-29

Study Completion Date

2017-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the difference in the proportion of hemipelves with successful detection of Sentinel Lymph Node according to the dye used (indocyanine green with near-infrared imaging vs blue dye) in women with endometrial cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In the past few years, Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) procedure has emerged as an interesting solution to the debate on lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. Using blue-dye is inexpensive but results in an unsatisfactory detection rate of SLN. IndoCyanine Green (ICG) with near-infrared imaging is a novel technology for SLN mapping and initial reports on the use of ICG have shown high detection rate. In the present study, we aim to determine precisely the increase in detection rate of SLN associated with the use of ICG instead of blue dye. This randomized controlled trial will include patients with preoperative stage I endometrial carcinoma. All included women will undergo SLN mapping with blue dye in one hemipelvis and ICG in the other hemipelvis. Randomization will concern the side of the hemipelvis in which blue dye vs ICG mapping is used, so that the patient's contralateral hemipelvis will serve as a control to her ipsilateral hemipelvis. The primary endpoint is the difference in the proportion of hemipelves with successful detection of SLN according to the dye used. The unique precise information gained from the present study will contribute to determine whether the benefit of the use of ICG over blue dye is sufficient to justify the expense of its use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endometrial Neoplasms

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Indocyanine Green on the right side

Indocyanine Green will be injected on the right side of the cervix and Methylene blue on the left side of the cervix.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Methylene Blue on the right side

Methylene blue will be injected on the right side of the cervix and Indocyanine Green on the left side of the cervix.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* all patients with endometrial carcinoma proven by endometrial biopsy or curettage AND
* preoperative FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage I AND
* intended for staging via laparoscopic or robotic surgery AND
* Patients must be older than 18 year-old, able to read French or English.

Exclusion Criteria

* preoperative FIGO stages II to IV
* previous pelvic or paraaortic lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy
* surgery that could change the uterine lymphatic drainage (myomectomy)
* iodine allergy
* pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Béatrice Cormier, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Montréal Hôpital Saint Luc

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987 Oct 15;60(8 Suppl):2035-41. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+3.0.co;2-8.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 3652025 (View on PubMed)

Abu-Rustum NR, Alektiar K, Iasonos A, Lev G, Sonoda Y, Aghajanian C, Chi DS, Barakat RR. The incidence of symptomatic lower-extremity lymphedema following treatment of uterine corpus malignancies: a 12-year experience at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):714-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.055. Epub 2006 Jun 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16740298 (View on PubMed)

Dankert J, Bouma J. Recurrent acute leg cellulitis after hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1987 Aug;94(8):788-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1987.tb03728.x.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 3663535 (View on PubMed)

Querleu D, Leblanc E, Cartron G, Narducci F, Ferron G, Martel P. Audit of preoperative and early complications of laparoscopic lymph node dissection in 1000 gynecologic cancer patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.043. Epub 2006 May 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16677594 (View on PubMed)

Barlin JN, Khoury-Collado F, Kim CH, Leitao MM Jr, Chi DS, Sonoda Y, Alektiar K, DeLair DF, Barakat RR, Abu-Rustum NR. The importance of applying a sentinel lymph node mapping algorithm in endometrial cancer staging: beyond removal of blue nodes. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):531-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Feb 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22366409 (View on PubMed)

Desai PH, Hughes P, Tobias DH, Tchabo N, Heller PB, Dise C, Slomovitz BM. Accuracy of robotic sentinel lymph node detection (RSLND) for patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Nov;135(2):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.032. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25175452 (View on PubMed)

Cormier B, Rozenholc AT, Gotlieb W, Plante M, Giede C; Communities of Practice (CoP) Group of Society of Gynecologic Oncology of Canada (GOC). Sentinel lymph node procedure in endometrial cancer: A systematic review and proposal for standardization of future research. Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Aug;138(2):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.05.039. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26047592 (View on PubMed)

Ballester M, Dubernard G, Lecuru F, Heitz D, Mathevet P, Marret H, Querleu D, Golfier F, Leblanc E, Rouzier R, Darai E. Detection rate and diagnostic accuracy of sentinel-node biopsy in early stage endometrial cancer: a prospective multicentre study (SENTI-ENDO). Lancet Oncol. 2011 May;12(5):469-76. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70070-5. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21489874 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE 15.114

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ICG and SLN Mapping
NCT05859971 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1