Correlation Between CT Perfusion and Post Y-90 TARE PET/CT Dosimetry
NCT ID: NCT02558205
Last Updated: 2020-10-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study will do this by:
1. Measuring the blood flow and blood volume of tumors in the imaging data from a CT body perfusion
2. Measuring the radioactivity in the tumors after the radioembolization treatment using PET/CT and then calculating the dose deposited in the tumor
3. Using statistical analysis to assess the relationship between the dose and the perfusion parameters
In addition, the research may help develop a method for calculating the dose of radioembolization to be delivered to a liver tumor(s) using blood volume and blood flow data obtained from the CT body perfusion scans.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sorafenib Concurrent With Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Cancer
NCT02288507
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Diagnosing Patients With Liver Cancer Undergoing Yttrium-90 Radioembolization
NCT03300401
Combination Chemoembolization and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT02513199
Yttrium Y-90 Radioembolization in Treating Patients With Metastatic Liver Cancer
NCT03028311
Radiation Therapy With Sorafenib for TACE-Resistant Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01618253
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Current practice is to calculate and deliver an average liver lobe radiation dose based on either the lobar volume or the patient's body surface area. However, because of the hypervascular nature of HCC lesions, the tumors receive a greater proportion of the beads than the healthy liver parenchyma and hence are assumed to receive radiation doses well above that of calculated average liver dose and the dose to the normal liver. Due to the differing vascularity and characteristics of tumors and patients, each Y-90 treatment does not deliver the same dose to the tumor. A less vascular tumor may receive substantially less radiation than a more vascular one which affects the tumoricidal efficacy of the treatment and ultimately the patient's final outcome. New techniques using Positron Emission Tomography (PET)/CT following Y-90 treatment allow for retrospective dosimetry to determine the actual dose delivered to the tumor. However, no methodology exists to plan the dose to be delivered to the tumor prior to the treatment.
This research aims to collect preliminary data to begin to establish a prospective method to use Computed Tomography (CT) perfusion studies of the liver to calculate the expected dose to the HCC lesions and the normal liver based on the blood flow and blood volume. This goal will be achieved by prospectively collecting CT Perfusion studies prior to Y-90 radioembolization treatments and PET/CT immediately following treatments. The relationship between the perfusion parameters representing the vascularity of the lesions and the normal liver and the post treatment PET/CT dosimetry will be established by this line of research. The hypothesized correlation between the perfusion parameters and the tumor dose as established by PET/CT will allow for patient and tumor specific treatment planning ensuring that the appropriate tumoricidal radiation dose is reliably delivered.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CT Perfusion and PET/CT
Patients undergo both a CT liver perfusion study pre Y-90 treatment and a PET/CT of liver following Y-90 treatment. For the PET/CT no additional radioactivity is required.
CT Liver Perfusion
Imaging study of liver using injection of Iodine contrast agent done using CT imaging
PET/CT of liver
PET/CT of liver following Y-90 treatment. PET/CT imaging uses positron decay of Y-90 to detect distribution of Y-90 in the liver.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT Liver Perfusion
Imaging study of liver using injection of Iodine contrast agent done using CT imaging
PET/CT of liver
PET/CT of liver following Y-90 treatment. PET/CT imaging uses positron decay of Y-90 to detect distribution of Y-90 in the liver.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Candidate for Trans-Arterial Radioembolization treatment
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant
* Iodinated Contrast Agent Allergy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Swim Across America
OTHER
Rush University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mark P Supanich, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rush University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frampas E, Lassau N, Zappa M, Vullierme MP, Koscielny S, Vilgrain V. Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: early evaluation of response to targeted therapy and prognostic value of Perfusion CT and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Ultrasound. Preliminary results. Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):e205-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.004. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Morsbach F, Sah BR, Spring L, Puippe G, Gordic S, Seifert B, Schaefer N, Pfammatter T, Alkadhi H, Reiner CS. Perfusion CT best predicts outcome after radioembolization of liver metastases: a comparison of radionuclide and CT imaging techniques. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jul;24(7):1455-65. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3180-3. Epub 2014 May 12.
Lea WB, Tapp KN, Tann M, Hutchins GD, Fletcher JW, Johnson MS. Microsphere localization and dose quantification using positron emission tomography/CT following hepatic intraarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Oct;25(10):1595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2014.06.028. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
Bourgeois AC, Chang TT, Bradley YC, Acuff SN, Pasciak AS. Intraprocedural yttrium-90 positron emission tomography/CT for treatment optimization of yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):271-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.11.004.
D'Arienzo M, Filippi L, Chiaramida P, Chiacchiararelli L, Cianni R, Salvatori R, Scopinaro F, Bagni O. Absorbed dose to lesion and clinical outcome after liver radioembolization with 90Y microspheres: a case report of PET-based dosimetry. Ann Nucl Med. 2013 Aug;27(7):676-80. doi: 10.1007/s12149-013-0726-4. Epub 2013 Apr 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14100902
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.