The Prime Study - Comparing Hepatitis C Care and Treatment in a Primary Health Care Service With a Tertiary Hospital

NCT ID: NCT02555475

Last Updated: 2018-05-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

140 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2018-05-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Prime Study is a randomised trial investigating models of care for hepatitis C in the era of direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. The study aims to compare outcomes of hepatitis C care and DAA treatment provided in a primary health care service with a tertiary hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This open label randomised trial will investigate the efficacy of treating people with G1 HCV with DAA in primary healthcare services compared with tertiary hospital clinics. Three hundred and eighty G1 HCV infected patients attending study primary healthcare centres will be invited to participate in the study.

At the primary healthcare centre participants will be randomly allocated to two groups:

Group 1: (n=190) Following their initial screen, these participants will be referred to a tertiary hospital for transient elastography and DAA treatment (traditional model of care)

Group 2: (n=190) Following their initial screen, these participants will be offered transient elastography and DAA treatment delivered at the primary healthcare service only.

Treatment will consist of fixed dose combination paritaprevir, ombitasvir and ritonavir packaged together with dasabuvir, known as Viekira Pak, +/- weight based ribavirin. As cirrhotic patients will be excluded from the study, the duration of treatment is 12 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hepatitis C

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1, tertiary hospital based care

Group 1: (n=190) Following their initial screen, these participants will be referred to a tertiary hospital for hepatitis C care, transient elastography and DAA treatment (traditional / standard model of care).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Group 2, community based care

Group 2: (n=190) Following their initial screen, these participants will be offered community based hepatitis C care and treatment. Hepatitis C care, transient elastography and DAA treatment will be delivered at the primary healthcare centre only.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

community based hepatitis C care and treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

community based hepatitis C care and treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Aged ≥18 years;
* Attendance at a study PHCS defined as; Attended appointment at PHCS at least once in 2014 or; Attended at least one consultation with a study community hepatitis nurse between 2012-2014
* Evidence of chronic G1 HCV infection (HCV antibody positive for \> 6 months and HCV RNA positive);
* Absence of cirrhosis defined as one of the following:

Liver biopsy within 24 months prior to screening demonstrating absence of cirrhosis (e.g. a Metavir score of 3 or less or an Ishak score of 4 or less); or A screening FibroScan result of \<9.6 kPa; or if a FibroScan is unsuccessful A screening Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) ≤ 2 and no clinical or laboratory evidence of cirrhosis;

* HCV treatment naive or pegylated or standard interferon and ribavirin experienced;
* Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Subjects must have the following laboratory parameters at screening:

* ALT ≤ 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN);
* AST ≤ 10 times ULN
* Haemoglobin ≥ 12g/dL for males; ≥ 11g/dL for female subjects;
* Platelet count ≥ laboratory lower limit of normal;
* INR ≤ laboratory upper limit of normal, unless stable on an anticoagulant regimen affecting INR;
* Albumin ≥ laboratory lower limit of normal;
* Direct bilirubin ≤ laboratory upper limit of normal;
* Creatinine clearance (Clcr) ≥ 60mL/min as calculated by Cockcroft-Gault equation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Known cirrhosis defined as:

Liver biopsy within 24 months prior to screening demonstrating cirrhosis (e.g. a Metavir score \> 3 or an Ishak score \> 4); or A FibroScan result of \>12.5 kPa; or Prior clinical evidence of cirrhosis or portal hypertension (i.e. ascites, varices).

* Prior exposure to HCV DAA protease inhibitors
* Currently receiving HCV treatment;
* Testing positive for HIV;
* Testing positive for HBsAg;
* HCC;
* Pregnancy or breastfeeding at screening or baseline;
* Evidence of any condition, therapy, laboratory abnormality or other circumstance (current or prior) that may confound the study's results, or interfere with participation for the full duration of the study, such that it is not in the best interest of the participant;
* Use of concomitant medications that are contraindicated with Viekira Pak within 28 days of the baseline/day 1 visit, that are unable to be ceased for the duration of treatment.


* increased baseline risk for anaemia (i.e. history of thalassaemia, spherocytosis, history of GI bleeding) or;
* patients for whom anaemia would be medically problematic or;
* documented of presumed coronary artery disease or cerebrovascular disease, if in the judgement of the investigator, an acute decrease in haemoglobin by up to 4 g/dL (as may be seen with ribavirin) would not be well tolerated.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Macfarlane Burnet Institute for Medical Research and Public Health Ltd

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Vincents Hospital Melbourne

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Burnet Institute

Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Hospital Liver Clinic

Greenlane, Auckland, New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland Opioid Treatment Service (AOTS)

Point Chevalier, Auckland, New Zealand

Site Status

Hepatitis C Community Clinic

Sydenham, Christchurch, New Zealand

Site Status

Calder Centre Auckland

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Auckland Central liver Clinic

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Community Alcohol and Drug Services

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Australia New Zealand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wade AJ, Doyle JS, Gane E, Stedman C, Draper B, Iser D, Roberts SK, Kemp W, Petrie D, Scott N, Higgs P, Agius PA, Roney J, Stothers L, Thompson AJ, Hellard ME. Outcomes of Treatment for Hepatitis C in Primary Care, Compared to Hospital-based Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in People Who Inject Drugs. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1900-1906. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz546.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31233117 (View on PubMed)

Wade AJ, Doyle JS, Gane E, Stedman C, Draper B, Iser D, Roberts SK, Kemp W, Petrie D, Scott N, Higgs P, Agius PA, Roney J, Stothers L, Thompson AJ, Hellard ME. Community-based provision of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C: study protocol and challenges of a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jul 16;19(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2768-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30012192 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HREC/15/SVHM/41

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Australian Trial in Acute Hepatitis C
NCT00192569 COMPLETED PHASE4