Quality of Life in Patients With Anal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT02546973

Last Updated: 2023-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-09-30

Study Completion Date

2024-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A national study of a three year cohort consisting of all patients diagnosed with anal cancer in 2011- 2013 with data retrieval from three national registries: Cancer Registry, Patient registry and Cause of Death Registry all within the Swedish Board of Health and Welfare. All out- and inpatient visits with diagnoses, admission dates and discharge dates will be requested including.

Patient documentation from the concerned hospitals will be collected and data on the details of the treatment collected retrospectively in a standardised fashion using a clinical record form.

Comorbidity will be calculated using data from the Patient Registry using all main and co-diagnoses 2 years prior and then at least two years after treatment cessation.

Detailed questionnaires will be sent out once at 2-3 years and a second time at about 6 years after index treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the anus or "anal cancer" is an uncommon disease in the Western world. In Sweden approximately 100 patients are diagnosed each year. Most patients are treated by chemotherapy and radiation, but a small subgroup of non-responders and patients with recurrent disease undergo abdominoperineal excision with a permanent colostomy. In most reports of results these patients have a worse prognosis and a higher risk of local recurrence than anal cancer as a group(1, 2), possibly a result of a selection bias. Recently the results in a large Nordic cohort were presented, indicating that a further factor connected with successful outcome was that the patient was included in a treatment protocol(3).

A small number of patients with very small cancers are operated on primarily. This is especially true for anal margin tumours(4). However, for the most part patients will be primarily treated with radiotherapy, as their curative treatment.

In Sweden the treatment has been centralised for many years. The radiotherapy is normally a long course therapy with many smaller doses resulting in a high dose of radiation. There are well known complications such as skin problems and to some extent chronic radiation effects on deeper structures, which can result in functional side effects. If the treatment includes an abdominoperineal excision, the effects of a colostomy on quality of life as well as functional aspects of this surgical procedure are largely unknown in this group of patients. In our research group we have earlier studied large cohorts of patients who have undergone abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer, and also unselected groups of patients with rectal cancer, studying both functional aspects and quality of life using detailed questionnaires (5, 6). Further we have results on quality of life from a cohort of Swedish inhabitants, representing men and women aged 30 to 90 years. The majority of the questions in these questionnaires are similar making comparisons possible.

In other studies within the SSORG network we have used the "Steineck concept" to investigate patient experiences of health, functional results and quality of life (7-11). We use specific questionnaires with detailed questions about experiences and symptoms asking about severity and duration as well as questions on socioeconomic functioning and life style factors (12, 13). Our experience is that patients are motivated to answer such questionnaires, with a compliance at 3 months \>90% and at 12 months \>85%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with anal cancer

All patients with anal cancer during 2011-2013 will be asked to participate

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients registered with a diagnosis of anal cancer in either the Patient registry or the Cancer Registry during 2011 - 2013.

Exclusion Criteria

* No informed consent received for participation in the questionnaire part of the study.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Eva Angenete

M.D., Ph.D., Ass. Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eva Angenete, M.D., Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Ostra

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANCA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id