Comparability and Standardization of Controlled Allergen Challenge Facilities

NCT ID: NCT02543346

Last Updated: 2019-04-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Allergen challenge facilities have been utilized for many years in clinical drug trials studying onset of action, proof of concept, duration of action, and efficacy. Each facility has somewhat different design characteristics and pollen dispersal technologies. Facilities are located in disparate geographic areas and have populations of participants who are sensitized to allergens unique to that area. Therefore, facilities have operated as single sites with little effort to evaluate facility comparability or to attempt standardization across facilities. The purpose of this study is to compare the two sites and assess whether the sites are able to achieve similar symptom scores.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

When CACF have been designed with a high degree of rigor, quality assurance and validation testing, the exposure to controlled levels of pollen in such facilities as the Environmental Exposure Unit (EEU) and the Biogenics Research Chamber (BRC) will demonstrate comparable/standardized symptomatic responses. This will be demonstrable not only following pollen exposure but will also have similar reductions in symptoms following treatment with a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication known to be effective for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis ( SAR); cetirizine 10mg. Because of quality assurance and validation testing completed at these facilities a priori, this comparability will be demonstrated despite their disparate geographical physical locations and the utilization of these facilities of somewhat different mechanical and technical materials and methods to achieve similar outcomes.

This multi-center study of SAR will enroll 50 participants at each site. These participants will be age 18-65, male and female, with a mixture of ethnic groups. The study will involve 3 Phases: Screening, Treatment Exposure Visit, and a cross-over Treatment Exposure Visit. In all stages, a CACF visit will be pivotal to determine participant eligibility for enrollment and response to therapy. The qualifying participants will receive a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover intervention with cetirizine HCl 10mg.

All participants will give written informed consent prior to any study related procedures being performed. Participants who meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria during the screening process will be asked to return to the EEU for their first pollen exposure visit (Treatment Visit #1). At the Screening Visit participants will provide a full medical history and undergo a physical examination. They will have their height/weight and vitals measured and skin testing will be performed to confirm allergic response to a panel of common aeroallergens. Women of child bearing potential will undergo a urine pregnancy test to rule out pregnancy. Eligible participants will be invited back to the research centre for 4 pollen exposure visits at 2 of these visits participants will receive either cetirizine or placebo. All participants will receive placebo at some point throughout the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Allergic Rhinitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cetirizine hydrochloride

Group Type OTHER

Cetirizine

Intervention Type DRUG

Participants will receive either cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) or a placebo (sugar pill) at one of the two treatment visits.

placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive either a placebo or cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) at one of the two treatment visits

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cetirizine

Participants will receive either cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) or a placebo (sugar pill) at one of the two treatment visits.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Participants will receive either a placebo or cetirizine (10mg tablet, orally) at one of the two treatment visits

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Zyrtec Reactine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* history of rhinoconjunctivitis during ragweed season for a minimum of 2 years, including the previous 2 ragweed seasons.
* positive skin test to ragweed allergen.

Exclusion Criteria

* participant is pregnant, lactating or actively trying to conceive.
* has a history of receiving immunotherapy containing short ragweed within the last 3 years.
* participant has current allergy symptoms.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biogenics Research Chamber, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Queen's University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Anne Ellis

Chair, Division of Allergy & Immunology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne K Ellis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Queen's University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Biogenics Research Chamber

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EEU-BRC-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.