Prosthetic Fit Assessment in Transtibial Amputees Secondary to Trauma

NCT ID: NCT02540681

Last Updated: 2021-03-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-01-31

Study Completion Date

2021-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aims of this study address an exploratory endpoint in the Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC) Transtibial Amputation Outcomes Study (TAOS; NCT01821976) that is investigating prosthesis fit, alignment and condition of the residual limb. As there are no validated measures of fit and alignment (factors known to impact comfort, function and performance among amputees) the TAOS study includes a provision in the protocol for acquisition of photographs, video and radiographs in order to help develop uniform assessments of the residual limb. The goal of the ProFit study is to validate and refine the prosthetic assessment tool (ProFit) that was developed by an expert panel of certified orthotist prosthetistis (CPOs) in collaboration with orthopaedic trauma investigators, a measurement scientist and a biomedical engineer from the BADER consortium.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Specific Aim 1: To test the reliability of the ProFit.

Patients enrolled in the TAOS trial returning for their eighteen month final visit will undergo radiographic, video, and photographic assessment. A blinded prosthetist panel (PP) will view these remotely and complete a 42 item assessment based on x-ray, photo and video. We will examine two aspects of reliability for the ProFit, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency.

Specific Aim 2: To examine the validity and responsiveness of the ProFit.

This study aims to examine the validity of the ProFit by specifically evaluating factor validity, construct validity and discriminant validity. This will be accomplished by correlating ProFit scores with measures of self-reported pain (Brief Pain Inventory), function (Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment), and satisfaction (Orthotics and Prosthetics User's Survey). Moreover, a subset of subjects will undergo quantitative measurement of fit and alignment using a novel prosthesis-mounted socket reaction moment sensor. Responsiveness of the ProFit will be based on repeated measurements at 6 and 18 months.

Specific Aim 3: To develop a shorter version of the ProFit.

Based on findings from Aim 1 and 2 at the individual item level, we will remove items that: 1) have poor inter-rater agreement; 2) demonstrate weak relationships with clinician and patient report of overall fit; or 3) exhibit strong ceiling or floor effects.

Study design: The ProFit study is a prospective validation study of an assessment of prosthetic fit and alignment among patients with a transtibial amputation.

Study duration: 3 years Sample size: 120 TAOS patients will provide adequate power to detect important differences in fit and alignment 18 months following amputation. A subset of 60 patients is necessary to detect significant differences in alignment using the Smart Pyramid.

Number of study sites: Up to 35 centers including 24 Core METRC sites, 4 MTFs, and 7 METRC satellite sites.

Study population: Patients enrolled in the METRC TAOS study.

Outcome measure: This ancillary project to the TAOS trial is designed to study the validity reliability and validity of the ProFit, a 42-item tool for assessing prosthetic fit and alignment among patients with a transtibial amputation.

Statistical analysis: Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency will be examined to test the reliability of the ProFit. The validity of this assessment will be evaluated using a variety of construct validity tests. Based on findings from the reliability and validity analysis, a shorter version of the ProFit will be developed. The performance of the shorter version will be determined based on correlation with the original assessment.

Randomization: Not applicable

Safety monitoring: Not applicable

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Traumatic Amputation of Lower Extremity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Must be enrolled in the TAOS study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients weighing \<300 lbs.
* Patient requires an LAR
* Women who are breastfeeding or pregnant
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lisa Reider, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of California at San Francisco

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Carolinas Medical Center

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wake Forest University Baptist Center

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

MetroHealth Medical Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio Military Medical Center

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium (METRC). Development of a prosthetic fit and alignment assessment (ProFit) in persons with post-traumatic transtibial amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Dec 1;47(6):599-606. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000237. Epub 2023 Apr 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37052578 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OR130357

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Transtibial Osseointegration
NCT06636136 RECRUITING NA