Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor(AI) With Ovarian Suppression Versus Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT02532400

Last Updated: 2020-03-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

21 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-03-31

Study Completion Date

2019-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian suppression with chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Neoadjuvant therapy is nowadays the standard treatment for both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer, and exhibited similar benefit compared with adjuvant therapy in terms of disease free and overall survival. Patients achieved pathological complete response(pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have superior outcome compared with those with residual tumors in breast and/or axilla. pCR is now the most wildly accepted surrogate marker for long-term survival of patients, especially in those with triple negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2)-positive breast cancer. However, in luminal HER2-negative breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not as effective as in other subtypes of breast cancer, pCR is less noted and seems barely correlated to long-term survival benefit.

In postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of aromatase inhibitor achieved similar clinical response rate compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients, neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian function suppression(OFS) has showed more pronounced efficacy than tamoxifen plus OFS.

In adjuvant setting, aromatase inhibitor combined with OFS in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has demonstrated superior benefit in terms of disease free survival, and has been established as one of the routine options of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Notwithstanding the remarkable performance of combination of aromatase inhibitor and OFS in adjuvant therapy, the role of this treatment strategy in neoadjuvant setting has yet not been proved when compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor plus OFS with chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy

Six months of exemestane or anastrozole plus goserelin.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Goserelin: 3.6mg, d1, hypodermic injection , q28d\*7 plus exemestane: 25mg, po, qd\*24w, or anastrozole: 1mg, po, qd\*24w

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Six cycles of docetaxel plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide(TEC).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Intervention Type DRUG

Docetaxel: 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6, Epirubicin 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6 and Cyclophosphamide: 500mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy

Goserelin: 3.6mg, d1, hypodermic injection , q28d\*7 plus exemestane: 25mg, po, qd\*24w, or anastrozole: 1mg, po, qd\*24w

Intervention Type DRUG

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Docetaxel: 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6, Epirubicin 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6 and Cyclophosphamide: 500mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Goserelin and AI TEC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Written informed consent
2. Women aged ≥ 18 years
3. Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
4. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage: ⅡA-ⅢC, no evidence of metastasis
5. At least one measurable disease in breast and/or axilla
6. ER and/or progesterone receptor(PgR) positive(≥10% of the cells by IHC)
7. HER2 negative(by IHC and/or FISH)
8. Premenopause status (estradiol in premenopausal range or with normal menstrual cycle in the past 6 months with no use of hormonal drugs)
9. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)score 0-1, an estimated life expectancy of at least 12 months
10. Adequate bone marrow function: Leukocyte ≥ 3.0\*109/L; Neutrophil ≥ 1.5\*109/L; Hb ≥ 100g/L; Platelet(PLT) ≥ 80\*109/L
11. Adequate liver, renal function and coagulation function: Alanine transaminase(ALT) and/or Aspartate transaminase(AST)≤ 1.5 upper normal limit(UNL), total bilirubin ≤upper normal limit, creatinine ≤ 110umol/L, Creatinine clearance \> 60ml/min, blood urea nitrogen(BUN) ≤ 7.1mmol/L, activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT) ≤ 1.5 upper normal limit(UNL)
12. Women with child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days of drug administration and agree to use an acceptable method of birth control to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the study
13. Serological records of hepatitis B virus(HBV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV) testing.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Stage IV breast cancer
2. Prior systemic or loco-regional treatment of breast cancer
3. Any anti-neoplastic treatment within 28 days before the beginning of study
4. Known severe hypersensitivity to any drugs in this study
5. History of malignancy within 5 years except carcinoma in situ of cervix or skin basal cell carcinoma that had received adequate treatment
6. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ 2°, according to National Cancer Institute(NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE)(Version 4.0)
7. Any cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction defined as following:

(1) ≥ 3° symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) according to NCI CTCAE(Version 4.0) or ≥ 2° CHF according to New York Heart Association(NYHA)

(2) Angina that needs anti-anginal drugs, advanced conduction abnormality or significant vascular disease

(3) Uncontrolled high-risk arrhythmia: atrial tachycardia that silent heart rate \>100/min, significant ventricular arrythmia or advanced atrioventricular block(2° type II atrioventricular or 3° atrioventricular block)

(4) Poorly controlled hypertension (systolic BP \> 180 mmHg or diastolic BP \> 100 mmHg)

(5) Transmural myocardial infarction in EKG

(6) Long-term oxygen therapy

8\. Uncontrolled severe systemic disease(clinically significant cardiovascular disease,pulmonary disease or metabolic disease, wound healing disorder, ulcer, severe infection)

9\. Pregnant or breast feeding

10\. Major operation, obvious trauma within 28 days before randomization or planned major operation during the study

11\. Known active hepatic disease due to hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, auto-immune liver disease or sclerosing cholangitis

12\. Known HIV infection

13\. Any reasons investigators consider that not suitable for the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruijin Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Li Zhu

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Li Zhu, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ruijin Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel Members. Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1533-46. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. Epub 2015 May 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25939896 (View on PubMed)

Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Feb 2;97(3):188-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15687361 (View on PubMed)

von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22508812 (View on PubMed)

Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Bonnefoi H, Cameron D, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Swain SM, Prowell T, Loibl S, Wickerham DL, Bogaerts J, Baselga J, Perou C, Blumenthal G, Blohmer J, Mamounas EP, Bergh J, Semiglazov V, Justice R, Eidtmann H, Paik S, Piccart M, Sridhara R, Fasching PA, Slaets L, Tang S, Gerber B, Geyer CE Jr, Pazdur R, Ditsch N, Rastogi P, Eiermann W, von Minckwitz G. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24529560 (View on PubMed)

Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA, Ziltsova EK, Ivanov VG, Bozhok AA, Melnikova OA, Paltuev RM, Kletzel A, Berstein LM. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007 Jul 15;110(2):244-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22789.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17538978 (View on PubMed)

Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Lin L, Snider J, Prat A, Parker JS, Luo J, DeSchryver K, Allred DC, Esserman LJ, Unzeitig GW, Margenthaler J, Babiera GV, Marcom PK, Guenther JM, Watson MA, Leitch M, Hunt K, Olson JA. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2342-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6950. Epub 2011 May 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21555689 (View on PubMed)

Masuda N, Sagara Y, Kinoshita T, Iwata H, Nakamura S, Yanagita Y, Nishimura R, Iwase H, Kamigaki S, Takei H, Noguchi S. Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Apr;13(4):345-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70373-4. Epub 2012 Jan 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22265697 (View on PubMed)

Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Lang I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Perez EA, Ciruelos E, Stearns V, Bonnefoi HR, Martino S, Geyer CE Jr, Pinotti G, Puglisi F, Crivellari D, Ruhstaller T, Winer EP, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Maibach R, Ruepp B, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price KN, Bernhard J, Luo W, Ribi K, Viale G, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Francis PA; TEXT and SOFT Investigators; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):107-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404037. Epub 2014 Jun 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24881463 (View on PubMed)

Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Lang I, Ciruelos E, Bellet M, Bonnefoi HR, Climent MA, Da Prada GA, Burstein HJ, Martino S, Davidson NE, Geyer CE Jr, Walley BA, Coleman R, Kerbrat P, Buchholz S, Ingle JN, Winer EP, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Maibach R, Ruepp B, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price KN, Colleoni M, Viale G, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD; SOFT Investigators; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):436-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412379. Epub 2014 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25495490 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RJBC1505

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.