Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor(AI) With Ovarian Suppression Versus Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Breast Cancer Patients
NCT ID: NCT02532400
Last Updated: 2020-03-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-03-31
2019-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aromatase Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment in Postmenopausal HR(+) Breast Cancer
NCT02769104
Adjuvant Ovarian Suppression Plus Aromatase Inhibitor or Tamoxifen in Young Women
NCT02914158
Adjuvant Hormone Therapy in Treating Women With Operable Breast Cancer
NCT00002460
Efficacy of Tamoxifen Versus Toremifene in CYP2D6 IM/PM of Premenopausal Patients With ER-positive Early Breast Cancer
NCT03351062
Intermittent Letrozole Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer
NCT00549822
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of aromatase inhibitor achieved similar clinical response rate compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in premenopausal hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients, neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor plus ovarian function suppression(OFS) has showed more pronounced efficacy than tamoxifen plus OFS.
In adjuvant setting, aromatase inhibitor combined with OFS in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer has demonstrated superior benefit in terms of disease free survival, and has been established as one of the routine options of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Notwithstanding the remarkable performance of combination of aromatase inhibitor and OFS in adjuvant therapy, the role of this treatment strategy in neoadjuvant setting has yet not been proved when compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor plus OFS with chemotherapy in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
Six months of exemestane or anastrozole plus goserelin.
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
Goserelin: 3.6mg, d1, hypodermic injection , q28d\*7 plus exemestane: 25mg, po, qd\*24w, or anastrozole: 1mg, po, qd\*24w
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Six cycles of docetaxel plus epirubicin and cyclophosphamide(TEC).
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Docetaxel: 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6, Epirubicin 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6 and Cyclophosphamide: 500mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy
Goserelin: 3.6mg, d1, hypodermic injection , q28d\*7 plus exemestane: 25mg, po, qd\*24w, or anastrozole: 1mg, po, qd\*24w
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Docetaxel: 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6, Epirubicin 75mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6 and Cyclophosphamide: 500mg/m2, d1, q3w\*6
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Women aged ≥ 18 years
3. Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer
4. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage: ⅡA-ⅢC, no evidence of metastasis
5. At least one measurable disease in breast and/or axilla
6. ER and/or progesterone receptor(PgR) positive(≥10% of the cells by IHC)
7. HER2 negative(by IHC and/or FISH)
8. Premenopause status (estradiol in premenopausal range or with normal menstrual cycle in the past 6 months with no use of hormonal drugs)
9. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG)score 0-1, an estimated life expectancy of at least 12 months
10. Adequate bone marrow function: Leukocyte ≥ 3.0\*109/L; Neutrophil ≥ 1.5\*109/L; Hb ≥ 100g/L; Platelet(PLT) ≥ 80\*109/L
11. Adequate liver, renal function and coagulation function: Alanine transaminase(ALT) and/or Aspartate transaminase(AST)≤ 1.5 upper normal limit(UNL), total bilirubin ≤upper normal limit, creatinine ≤ 110umol/L, Creatinine clearance \> 60ml/min, blood urea nitrogen(BUN) ≤ 7.1mmol/L, activated partial thromboplastin time(APTT) ≤ 1.5 upper normal limit(UNL)
12. Women with child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test (urine or serum) within 7 days of drug administration and agree to use an acceptable method of birth control to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the study
13. Serological records of hepatitis B virus(HBV)and hepatitis C virus(HCV) testing.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Prior systemic or loco-regional treatment of breast cancer
3. Any anti-neoplastic treatment within 28 days before the beginning of study
4. Known severe hypersensitivity to any drugs in this study
5. History of malignancy within 5 years except carcinoma in situ of cervix or skin basal cell carcinoma that had received adequate treatment
6. Peripheral neuropathy ≥ 2°, according to National Cancer Institute(NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE)(Version 4.0)
7. Any cardiac or pulmonary dysfunction defined as following:
(1) ≥ 3° symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) according to NCI CTCAE(Version 4.0) or ≥ 2° CHF according to New York Heart Association(NYHA)
(2) Angina that needs anti-anginal drugs, advanced conduction abnormality or significant vascular disease
(3) Uncontrolled high-risk arrhythmia: atrial tachycardia that silent heart rate \>100/min, significant ventricular arrythmia or advanced atrioventricular block(2° type II atrioventricular or 3° atrioventricular block)
(4) Poorly controlled hypertension (systolic BP \> 180 mmHg or diastolic BP \> 100 mmHg)
(5) Transmural myocardial infarction in EKG
(6) Long-term oxygen therapy
8\. Uncontrolled severe systemic disease(clinically significant cardiovascular disease,pulmonary disease or metabolic disease, wound healing disorder, ulcer, severe infection)
9\. Pregnant or breast feeding
10\. Major operation, obvious trauma within 28 days before randomization or planned major operation during the study
11\. Known active hepatic disease due to hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, auto-immune liver disease or sclerosing cholangitis
12\. Known HIV infection
13\. Any reasons investigators consider that not suitable for the study
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ruijin Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Li Zhu
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Li Zhu, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Comprehensive Breast Health Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ruijin Hospital
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD, Gnant M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ; Panel Members. Tailoring therapies--improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1533-46. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv221. Epub 2015 May 4.
Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP. Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Feb 2;97(3):188-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji021.
von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, Gerber B, Eiermann W, Hilfrich J, Huober J, Jackisch C, Kaufmann M, Konecny GE, Denkert C, Nekljudova V, Mehta K, Loibl S. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 20;30(15):1796-804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.8595. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, Bonnefoi H, Cameron D, Gianni L, Valagussa P, Swain SM, Prowell T, Loibl S, Wickerham DL, Bogaerts J, Baselga J, Perou C, Blumenthal G, Blohmer J, Mamounas EP, Bergh J, Semiglazov V, Justice R, Eidtmann H, Paik S, Piccart M, Sridhara R, Fasching PA, Slaets L, Tang S, Gerber B, Geyer CE Jr, Pazdur R, Ditsch N, Rastogi P, Eiermann W, von Minckwitz G. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62422-8. Epub 2014 Feb 14.
Semiglazov VF, Semiglazov VV, Dashyan GA, Ziltsova EK, Ivanov VG, Bozhok AA, Melnikova OA, Paltuev RM, Kletzel A, Berstein LM. Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer. 2007 Jul 15;110(2):244-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22789.
Ellis MJ, Suman VJ, Hoog J, Lin L, Snider J, Prat A, Parker JS, Luo J, DeSchryver K, Allred DC, Esserman LJ, Unzeitig GW, Margenthaler J, Babiera GV, Marcom PK, Guenther JM, Watson MA, Leitch M, Hunt K, Olson JA. Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype--ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 10;29(17):2342-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.6950. Epub 2011 May 9.
Masuda N, Sagara Y, Kinoshita T, Iwata H, Nakamura S, Yanagita Y, Nishimura R, Iwase H, Kamigaki S, Takei H, Noguchi S. Neoadjuvant anastrozole versus tamoxifen in patients receiving goserelin for premenopausal breast cancer (STAGE): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Apr;13(4):345-52. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70373-4. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
Pagani O, Regan MM, Walley BA, Fleming GF, Colleoni M, Lang I, Gomez HL, Tondini C, Burstein HJ, Perez EA, Ciruelos E, Stearns V, Bonnefoi HR, Martino S, Geyer CE Jr, Pinotti G, Puglisi F, Crivellari D, Ruhstaller T, Winer EP, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Maibach R, Ruepp B, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price KN, Bernhard J, Luo W, Ribi K, Viale G, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Goldhirsch A, Francis PA; TEXT and SOFT Investigators; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant exemestane with ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 10;371(2):107-18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404037. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
Francis PA, Regan MM, Fleming GF, Lang I, Ciruelos E, Bellet M, Bonnefoi HR, Climent MA, Da Prada GA, Burstein HJ, Martino S, Davidson NE, Geyer CE Jr, Walley BA, Coleman R, Kerbrat P, Buchholz S, Ingle JN, Winer EP, Rabaglio-Poretti M, Maibach R, Ruepp B, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price KN, Colleoni M, Viale G, Coates AS, Goldhirsch A, Gelber RD; SOFT Investigators; International Breast Cancer Study Group. Adjuvant ovarian suppression in premenopausal breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29;372(5):436-46. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412379. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RJBC1505
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.