Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation the Effectiveness of a Telemonitoring Program in a Cohort of COPD Patient With Frequent Readmissions (NCT NCT02528370)
NCT ID: NCT02528370
Last Updated: 2021-02-16
Results Overview
The primary outcome of the program was to diminish the rate of hospitalizations for eCOPD. We defined an exacerbation as a sustained worsening of the participant's COPD symptoms from their usual stable state that was beyond normal day-to-day variations, and with a severity level that need hospital admission to be solved.
COMPLETED
NA
197 participants
two years
2021-02-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
telEPOC
The program consisted of: 1) Educational program about chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This educational program was carried-out by a respiratory nurse in two 30-minute speeches to the patient and career, once at their inclusion in the program and again 1 year later. 2) Training in using the device (smart phone) that supported the telemonitoring. 3) Daily phone calls to make self-confident the patient during the first week. Afterwards the phone calls were established according to the capacity of the patient to manage on their own.
|
No telEPOC / Usual Care
The control group follows the usual care protocol in our health system. That includes periodic control by their primary and respiratory specialist. They receive non-structured information/education about COPD and follow a programmed control agenda depending on the severity of the disease every 4-6 months.
Generally speaking the differences between the two cohorts were the educational structured program and the telemonitoring control.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
119
|
78
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
102
|
77
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
17
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation the Effectiveness of a Telemonitoring Program in a Cohort of COPD Patient With Frequent Readmissions
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
telEPOC
n=119 Participants
The program consisted of: 1) Educational program about COPD. This educational program was carried-out by a respiratory nurse in two 30-minute speeches to the patient and career, once at their inclusion in the program and again 1 year later. 2) Training in using the device (smart phone) that supported the telemonitoring. 3) Daily phone calls to make self-confident the patient during the first week. Afterwards the phone calls were established according to the capacity of the patient to manage on their own.
|
No telEPOC / Usual Care
n=78 Participants
The control group follows the usual care protocol in our health system. That includes periodic control by their primary and respiratory specialist. They receive non-structured information/education about COPD and follow a programmed control agenda depending on the severity of the disease every 4-6 months.
Generally speaking the differences between the two cohorts were the educational structured program and the telemonitoring control.
|
Total
n=197 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71.34 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.36 • n=93 Participants
|
70.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=4 Participants
|
70.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.83 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
16 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
103 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
171 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Spain
|
119 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
197 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Body mass, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, and exercise capacity (BODE) index
|
4.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5 • n=93 Participants
|
3.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.2 • n=4 Participants
|
4.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4 • n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: two yearsThe primary outcome of the program was to diminish the rate of hospitalizations for eCOPD. We defined an exacerbation as a sustained worsening of the participant's COPD symptoms from their usual stable state that was beyond normal day-to-day variations, and with a severity level that need hospital admission to be solved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
telEPOC
n=119 Participants
The program consisted of: 1) Educational program about COPD. This educational program was carried-out by a respiratory nurse in two 30-minute speeches to the patient and career, once at their inclusion in the program and again 1 year later. 2) Training in using the device (smart phone) that supported the telemonitoring. 3) Daily phone calls to make self-confident the patient during the first week. Afterwards the phone calls were established according to the capacity of the patient to manage on their own.
|
No telEPOC / Usual Care
n=78 Participants
The control group follows the usual care protocol in our health system. That includes periodic control by their primary and respiratory specialist. They receive non-structured information/education about COPD and follow a programmed control agenda depending on the severity of the disease every 4-6 months.
Generally speaking the differences between the two cohorts were the educational structured program and the telemonitoring control.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Hospitalizations for COPD Exacerbation (eCOPD)
|
1.1 number of hospital admissions
Interval 0.7 to 1.5
|
2.8 number of hospital admissions
Interval 2.2 to 3.4
|
Adverse Events
telEPOC
No telEPOC / Usual Care
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
telEPOC
n=119 participants at risk
The program consisted of: 1) Educational program about COPD. This educational program was carried-out by a respiratory nurse in two 30-minute speeches to the patient and career, once at their inclusion in the program and again 1 year later. 2) Training in using the device (smart phone) that supported the telemonitoring. 3) Daily phone calls to make self-confident the patient during the first week. Afterwards the phone calls were established according to the capacity of the patient to manage on their own.
|
No telEPOC / Usual Care
n=78 participants at risk
The control group follows the usual care protocol in our health system. That includes periodic control by their primary and respiratory specialist. They receive non-structured information/education about COPD and follow a programmed control agenda depending on the severity of the disease every 4-6 months.
Generally speaking the differences between the two cohorts were the educational structured program and the telemonitoring control.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer
|
1.7%
2/119
|
0.00%
0/78
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place