Relationships Among Cognitive Function, Lifestyle, and Exercise After Cancer Treatment
NCT ID: NCT02523677
Last Updated: 2017-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
456 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-07-31
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This research is critical to identifying potentially important approaches to improving health outcomes and quality of life in breast cancer patients and survivors. Previous research provides evidence of the influence of lifestyle behaviors on cognition and quality of life in healthy aging populations. However, despite data indicating cancer's negative impact on lifestyle behaviors, cognition, and quality of life, very few studies have investigated interactions among these factors in cancer patients and survivors.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A subset of participants who volunteer to do so will also wear an accelerometer for 24 hours per day for 7 consecutive days to objectively measure activity levels and sleep quality. Individuals will be asked if they are willing to be contacted to wear the accelerometer via the consent form. Only those individuals who check the box agreeing to be contacted by the research team will be contacted to wear the accelerometer (see consent form). Participants will be contacted via email and instructed to reply to the researcher by phone or email with their mailing address. The accelerometer, instructions for wear, a Record of Use form, and a postage-paid return envelope will be mailed to participants who agree to wear the monitor. Mailing labels from postage-paid return envelopes will be disposed of after accelerometers have been returned and recorded. The accelerometer will be worn during women's daily life on a normal week; therefore, minimal additional time committed to research activities will be required of participants. No contact will be solicited with participants over the course of the 6-month study period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 21 years or older
* English speaking
* Access to an iPad with iOS 6.2 or later and the Internet
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals under 21 years of age
* Individuals who do not have access to an iPad with iOS 6.2 or later
21 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Edward McAuley
Shahid and Ann Carlson Khan Professor in Applied Health Sciences
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Edward McAuley, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Urbana, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1985 Sep;10(3):141-6.
Marshall AL, Miller YD, Burton NW, Brown WJ. Measuring total and domain-specific sitting: a study of reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Jun;42(6):1094-102. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181c5ec18.
Visser M, Koster A. Development of a questionnaire to assess sedentary time in older persons--a comparative study using accelerometry. BMC Geriatr. 2013 Jul 30;13:80. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-13-80.
Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974.
Webster K, Cella D, Yost K. The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System: properties, applications, and interpretation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Dec 16;1:79. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-79.
Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The Satisfaction With Life Scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.
Lachman ME, Bandura M, Weaver SL, Elliott E. Assessing memory control beliefs: The Memory Controllability Inventory. Aging Cogn 2(1):67-84, 1995.
Zelinski EM, Gilewski MJ. A 10-item Rasch modeled memory self-efficacy scale. Aging Ment Health. 2004 Jul;8(4):293-306. doi: 10.1080/13607860410001709665.
Eriksen BA, Eriksen CW. Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics. 16:143-149, 1974.
Awh E, Jonides J, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Rehearsal in spatial working memory. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):780-90. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.24.3.780.
KIRCHNER WK. Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. J Exp Psychol. 1958 Apr;55(4):352-8. doi: 10.1037/h0043688. No abstract available.
Basner M, Dinges DF. Maximizing sensitivity of the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) to sleep loss. Sleep. 2011 May 1;34(5):581-91. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.581.
Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7.
Ehlers DK, Fanning J, Sunderlage A, Severson J, Kramer AF, McAuley E. Influence of sitting behaviors on sleep disturbance and memory impairment in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Med. 2020 May;9(10):3417-3424. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3008. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
Ehlers DK, Fanning J, Salerno EA, Aguinaga S, Cosman J, Severson J, Kramer AF, McAuley E. Replacing sedentary time with physical activity or sleep: effects on cancer-related cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors. BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 25;18(1):685. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4603-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UIUC_IRB_15666
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id